Come and face the law: HC to Vijay Mallya
- Quaid Najmi
- 2 hours ago
- 3 min read

Mumbai: In a strong sign of judicial impatience, the Bombay High Court asked the absconder liquor baron Vijay Vittal Mallya to ‘come back to India and face the law' instead of challenging it from London, where he is currently living.
A division bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad took exception to Mallya’s attempts to question the validity of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 without first submitting to or facing the Indian courts.
“You have to come back. If you cannot come back, then we cannot hear this plea,” the court said bluntly, during a hearing of Mallya’s petition challenging the proceedings that have declared him a fugitive economic offender and the constitutional validity of the FEO Act, 2018.
The court’s stern remarks followed an earlier order of Dec. 23 when it had directed Mallya to file an affidavit stating when he plans to return to India from the UK.
The court had made it clear that his challenge to the FEO Act would not be heard unless he first submitted to the court’s jurisdiction.
However, Mallya not only failed to specify his return date but also went ahead with his legal challenge without complying with the court directives.
“You are avoiding the process of the court, so you cannot take advantage of the present petition challenging the FEO Act,” said the court to Senior Advocate Amit Desai appearing for Mallya.
Representing the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta informed the court that Mallya had filed an affidavit claiming the banks were wrong to demand the money (dues) from him and was attempting to turn the case into recovery proceedings.
Mehta pointed out that Mallya had challenged the FEO Act, 2018, only after becoming a fugitive and while India was completing his extradition proceedings in London. He submitted that Mallya could come to India and argue everything but he should have faith in the Indian laws to claim equity.
“He can come and discuss everything – that ‘I am ready to pay, not ready to pay, not liable to pay’, etc. But he cannot ‘not’ trust the laws of this country and still invoke equity jurisdiction,” said Mehta emphatically.
When Desai argued that the nature of the statute permitted a hearing even in the petitioner’s absence, the court reminded him that a specific direction to state (Mallya’s) date of return was already on the record.
“In fairness to you, we are not dismissing it. We are giving you another opportunity,” said the bench, posting it for hearing next week.
The judges cautioned that if Mallya continued to ignore the court’s earlier order, they would be compelled to pass an order of ‘non-compliance’ if he failed to comply at the next hearing.
Time running out?
The once flamboyant and self-proclaimed ‘King of Good Times’ Mallya, 70, slipped out of India in March 2016 following huge debts piling up after the collapse of the Kingfisher Airlines, with a consortium of 17 Indian banks claiming default of over Rs 9000-crore loans.
The two-time MP also faced multiple probes from the Income Tax Department, ED, Central Bureau of Investigation and in 2019, he was declared a fugitive economic offender, which he has challenged. However, Mallya has claimed that he has repaid Rs. 14,000-cr. to banks against the loan dues of Rs 6,200-cr.
India moved for Mallya’s extradition which was cleared but the process has been stuck in delays.





Comments