top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

Cooperative Chaos

Updated: Feb 27, 2025

For the umpteenth time, an Indian cooperative bank has collapsed under the weight of mismanagement and regulatory complacency. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has imposed severe restrictions on the Mumbai-based New India Cooperative Bank after uncovering serious governance failures and liquidity issues. The bank’s depositors, many of them small savers, face an uncertain future, with withdrawals limited to Rs. 25,000 per account. Cooperative banks, particularly in Maharashtra, have a long history of financial scandals, political interference and lax oversight.


The failure of New India Cooperative Bank follows a well-worn script. Loans were sanctioned recklessly, often without the knowledge of branch managers, turning into non-performing assets (NPAs) almost overnight. In one particularly egregious case, a Rs.18 crore loan was allegedly granted to Bollywood actress Preity Zinta and later written off without due process. Meanwhile, the bank’s audited financials showed a suspiciously growing cash reserve – Rs.122 crore in 2023 rising to Rs. 135 crore in 2024 - yet the RBI’s intervention suggests these funds may have been entirely fictitious.


Regulators did act, but only when the crisis had already boiled over. The RBI first restricted withdrawals and loan disbursals, then superseded the bank’s board and appointed an administrator. As is often the case with cooperative bank failures, the damage has already been done.


The fundamental problem lies in the structure of cooperative banks: they are often controlled by politicians, lack professional management and have weak corporate governance. They function more like personal fiefdoms than financial institutions, doling out loans to cronies with little expectation of repayment.


The recurring failures of cooperative banks demand urgent reform. Governance norms must be strengthened. RBI should have greater control, including the power to directly regulate their lending practices, board appointments and financial disclosures. The dual regulation by state governments should be abolished.


Transparency must improve. Cooperative banks should be mandated to publicly disclose their lending patterns, NPAs, and major loan sanctions. Real-time monitoring of their financials could help detect fraudulent transactions before they spiral into full-blown crises.


Strict accountability must be enforced. Bank executives who engage in financial mismanagement should face strict legal action, including asset seizures and criminal prosecution. Depositors should not bear the cost of reckless lending and outright fraud.


Finally, deposit insurance needs an overhaul. The current cap of Rs. 5 lakh covers only a fraction of deposits in failed banks. Raising this limit and ensuring faster payouts would prevent financial ruin for small savers.

If cooperative banks are to remain a viable part of India’s financial system, they must be treated like serious financial institutions. Without urgent reform, these banks will continue to collapse, taking the savings of ordinary Indians with them.

Comments


bottom of page