top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Coup After Coup

As former President Andry Rajoelina loses both power and citizenship, Madagascar’s turbulent waltz between democracy and military rule repeats itself with echoes of a lingering colonial past.

Few African nations embody political déjà vu quite like Madagascar. The Indian Ocean island, famed for its unique biodiversity, has long been equally fertile ground for political upheaval. Earlier this month, the military once again stepped into the presidential palace in what is its seventh intervention since independence from France in 1960. The ousted president, Andry Rajoelina, fled into exile. Now, the country’s new rulers have stripped him of his Malagasy citizenship, citing his possession of a French passport. For a leader who first rose to power through a coup 15 years ago, history has come full circle.


The decree, signed by Prime Minister Herintsalama Rajaonarivelo, invoked an old law prohibiting dual nationality for Malagasy citizens. In principle, it is a technicality. In practice, it is political theater. By rescinding Rajoelina’s citizenship, the junta signalled a break with the Western-leaning elite who have long dominated Madagascar’s politics while reminding the island’s 30 million people that power, not legality, dictates legitimacy. The French passport, a symbol of privilege for a postcolonial class, has become the instrument of disgrace.


Rajoelina’s fall was as sudden as his rise. In 2009, then a young disc jockey-turned-mayor of Antananarivo, he led street protests that forced President Marc Ravalomanana into exile and installed himself as head of a transitional authority. Back then, France and other foreign powers hesitated to call it a coup, preferring the fiction of an interim government. Elections returned him to power in 2018, and he won again in 2023, though not without controversy over his dual nationality. The revelation that he had quietly obtained French citizenship in 2014 led critics to question whether he had ever truly severed ties with the former colonial master.


The irony of being undone by the very legal technicality that once threatened his candidacy is not lost on Malagasy observers. Yet, as in the past, the drama of individual downfall masks the deeper tragedy of institutional fragility. Madagascar’s political story has been one of alternating strongmen and soldiers, punctuated by popular uprisings that promise democracy but deliver paralysis. Coups in 1972, 1975, 1991, 1996, 2002, 2009 and now 2025 have left the country trapped in a loop of fleeting reform and enduring stagnation.


Each cycle follows a familiar script. Economic hardship fuels street protests. The security forces, initially deployed to suppress unrest, eventually side with the protesters or seize power themselves. The deposed leader flees abroad. Foreign governments issue calls for calm and ‘inclusive dialogue.’ Within months, a caretaker administration promises elections. When they come, they often restore one faction of the old order. The result is not revolution but rotation.


Rajoelina’s ouster was no exception. His final months in office were marred by rolling blackouts, water shortages, and soaring prices that left the young particularly angry. Demonstrations swelled in Antananarivo and provincial cities. Twenty-two people were killed and more than a hundred injured as security forces cracked down. When elements of the army turned against him, Rajoelina declared he feared for his life and disappeared from public view. Within days, Colonel Michael Randrianirina appeared on state television, promising “a new dawn” and elections within two years.


Meanwhile, the arrest of Rajoelina’s close associate, Maminiaina Ravatomanga, in Mauritius on charges of laundering $163 million, underscores the murky entanglement of business and politics that has long plagued the island.


Underlying the turmoil is Madagascar’s unresolved relationship with France. Though independence came 65 years ago, French interests still shape its economy and elite politics. Dual citizens occupy key business and political positions; French firms dominate infrastructure and mining. Rajoelina’s possession of a French passport was not unusual among the upper class, but it exposed the enduring contradiction of Malagasy nationalism tethered to colonial privilege. In stripping him of citizenship, the junta seeks to present itself as a nationalist corrective. Yet its own survival, like that of previous regimes, will likely depend on aid and recognition from Paris.

Comments


bottom of page