top of page

By:

Quad Najmi and PTI

17 June 2026 at 5:11:32 pm

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met...

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met Speaker Om Birla informally on Wednesday, claiming the support of six of the party's nine MPs in the Lower House, sources said. Thursday's high-stakes meeting in Delhi will legally and physically define whether Uddhav Thackeray retains his parliamentary strength or faces another devastating party division, the third since Raj Thackeray split Shiv Sena in 2006. Sources in Sena (UBT) said the rival camp still doesn't have the support of six MPs. They claim two of the six rebels have reportedly changed their mind. In a swift counter-offensive to contain the damage, the party high command issued a mandatory three-line whip, summoning an emergency parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi on Thursday to force a physical showdown where the MPs will have to mark their presence physically. The developments triggered a day of high political drama in the national capital, marked by a furious, expletive-laden press conference by Raut, a reported counter-meeting by the rebel faction with Lok Sabha Speaker Birla, and sharp condemnation from the Congress. The internal fracture was visible at Sanjay Raut's press briefing, where only three other Lok Sabha MPs, Arvind Sawant, Anil Desai, and Rajabhau Waje, stood by him. The remaining six lawmakers were conspicuously absent; their exact whereabouts are unknown. The Sena (UBT) has nine MPs in the Lok Sabha, and at least two‑thirds of them would be required to form a separate group. Apart from Desai, Waje and Sawant, the other six MPs are Sanjay Patil, Sanjay Deshmukh, Omprakash Raje Nimbalkar, Bhausaheb Wakchaure, Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar and Sanjay Jadhav Not Reachable The six MPs stopped responding or became unavailable since Wednesday forenoon, after which the party stopped contacting them. They said when the party contacted Mumbai North East MP, Sanjay Dina Patil, he told party leaders that he was not with the rebel group. The party had asked them to submit a letter to the Lok Sabha Speaker, which he has not submitted so far. Later in the day, sources claimed that the group of six rebel lawmakers had privately met the Lok Sabha Speaker to claim a two-thirds majority in the Lower House, the precise threshold required to escape disqualification under the anti-defection law. Simultaneously, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, who split the undivided Shiv Sena in 2022, was reportedly camping in Delhi to oversee the operational layout of the defection of MPs. He returned to his home town Thane in Wednesday night. He is reportedly studying all the legal aspects before taking a final call before the party’s foundation day on Friday. Speaker’s Role Following reports of the rebels' move, a loyalist delegation consisting of Raut, Sawant, and Desai rushed to meet Speaker Birla to file a formal representation urging him to reject any unlawful group alignment. Desai argued that the legal provisions are strictly on the side of the original organisational structure. "Under the law, a splinter group cannot simply merge with another party on its own, even if they have two-thirds support. Only the original administrative party holds that right," Desai told reporters, adding that the Speaker assured them he would thoroughly examine every legal aspect before rendering a decision. The widening panic inside the party also triggered a public, familial disconnect involving missing Hingoli MP Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar. While the MP remained unreachable, his son, Krushna Patil Ashtikar, the MVA's official candidate for Thursday's Maharashtra Legislative Council elections, released a video statement strongly defending Uddhav Thackeray. "I am a Shiv Sainik of Uddhav Thackeray. There is no room for doubt when it comes to me," the younger Ashtikar stated.

‘Diamond Prince’

Updated: Jan 13, 2025

Amid internal tensions and generational divides, Abhishek Banerjee is testing his mettle as Mamata Banerjee’s heir apparent.

Diamond Prince
West Bengal

Abhishek Banerjee, nephew of Trinamool Congress (TMC) supremo and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, has emerged as a formidable force for some time now. At 37, the three-time Member of Parliament from Diamond Harbour is not only the de facto number two in the party but also a leader with an ambitious vision for Bengal’s future.


His recent public health campaign, Sebaashray, epitomizes his focus on grassroots outreach. Over seven days, this initiative purportedly delivered healthcare to over 100,000 people in Diamond Harbour, underscoring his intent to craft a distinct ‘Diamond Harbour model’ of governance. Whether it is old-age pensions for the constituency’s elderly or his COVID-era interventions, Abhishek’s approach reflects a blend of charisma and meticulous planning. Yet, his growing influence has also exposed rifts within the TMC, raising questions about its future leadership and unity.


Abhishek’s success in Diamond Harbour, which he won with a thumping margin of over 700,000 votes in 2024, bolstered his credentials as a mass leader. However, his lack of administrative experience remains a sticking point. Unlike his aunt, who rose through the ranks as a grassroots organizer before taking the reins of the state, Abhishek’s political career is tethered to his familial ties. Calls for his inclusion in the state government have been met with resistance, both from Mamata herself and the old guard of the party, who view him as a disruptor of the status quo.


His push for a ‘retirement age’ in politics—a subtle jab at the TMC’s aging stalwarts—has only deepened these fissures. Mamata, who has always been wary of ceding control, had unequivocally declared herself to be “the final word” at a party meeting late last year, stifling any speculation of a transition of power. This intra-party tension underscores a generational battle, with the old guard clinging to their positions while younger leaders led by Abhishek advocate professionalizing the party.


Diamond Harbour has become Abhishek’s proving ground, a microcosm of his governance philosophy. His emphasis on efficiency, accountability, and outreach contrasts starkly with the broader TMC governance model, which critics argue suffers from bureaucratic inertia and corruption. This disparity has not gone unnoticed by the opposition, who argue that Abhishek’s initiatives inadvertently expose flaws in Mamata’s state-wide policies.


Moreover, Abhishek’s liberal stance on contentious issues, such as his defence of citizens’ right to protest during the RG Kar Medical College controversy, had earned him plaudits from moderates but alienated party hardliners.


Despite public denials, whispers of a rift between Abhishek and Mamata have grown louder. His abrupt “short hiatus” from party activities in mid-2024 where he cited allegedly pressing medical reasons had come on the heels of appointments to key party positions that sidelined his recommendations. These included the elevation of veterans like Sudip Bandyopadhyay, a leader Abhishek reportedly sought to retire.


His opposition to fielding controversial candidates—many of whom defected from the BJP or were tainted by scandals—further underscores the ideological and strategic differences between the two leaders.


The TMC’s reliance on Mamata’s charisma remains its greatest strength—and its Achilles’ heel. While Abhishek’s initiatives, including the recent Nabo Jowar campaign, have invigorated the party, they have yet to cement his status as an indispensable leader. His efforts to professionalize the TMC’s structure and appeal to Bengal’s youth resonate with a section of the electorate, but risk alienating the old guard who thrive under Mamata’s personality-driven style of politics.


For now, Abhishek remains a prince without a crown, his ambitions tempered by the towering presence of his aunt. Yet his experiments in Diamond Harbour, combined with his growing national profile, suggest that he is not merely content to be the TMC’s heir apparent. That said, he will need to convince Bengal that he can step out of Mamata’s shadow and lead the state into a new era.

Comments


bottom of page