top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Raj Thackeray tormented over ‘missing kids’ in state

Mumbai : Expressing grave concerns over the steep rise in cases of ‘missing children’ in the state, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) President Raj Thackeray has accused the state government of treating the matter casually and failing to respond to it urgently.   In an open missive on 'X' to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, Raj Thackeray quoted data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) pointing at almost an alarming 30 pc increase in the number of children ‘missing’ in the state...

Raj Thackeray tormented over ‘missing kids’ in state

Mumbai : Expressing grave concerns over the steep rise in cases of ‘missing children’ in the state, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) President Raj Thackeray has accused the state government of treating the matter casually and failing to respond to it urgently.   In an open missive on 'X' to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, Raj Thackeray quoted data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) pointing at almost an alarming 30 pc increase in the number of children ‘missing’ in the state between 2021-2024.   When asked for his reactions, Fadnavis told media-persons in Nagpur that he had not read the letter, but the issue raised is important and he would reply to it. Fadnavis stated that the NCRB has also provided the reasons why the kids go ‘missing’, how they return and the period, ranging from 3 days to 18 months.   Dwelling on the sufficiency of the NCRB figures, he contended that they reflect only complaints formally registered by the police and thousands of cases may never be reported.   On the ‘rescue, return and reunion’ of such missing children, he pointed to the sheer psychological trauma they may have suffered and sought to know how such child-lifter networks continued to thrive openly and blatantly.   The MNS chief targeted what he claimed was the “state’s lack of proactive measures to identify and dismantle child-begging rackets” as many juveniles can be seen begging at railway stations, bus stands, traffic signals, often accompanied by adults with doubtful authenticity.   “If some woman claims to be the child’s relative or guardian, should the government not order a thorough probe? Is it inappropriate to consider even a DNA test in suspicious cases,” Raj Thackeray demanded.   Slamming the government and the Opposition, he lamented how both sides failed to prioritise such urgent social issues in the legislature where discussions centre around partisan sparring.   The letter also mentions attempts by the Centre to coordinate with states on the ‘missing or trafficked children’, regretting how political upmanships and symbolic debates prevent meaningful action on the ground.   The NCRB said that Maharashtra has consistently ranked among states with the highest number of ‘missing children’, particularly in urban centres like Mumbai, Thane, and Pune.   Simultaneously, experts, child rights NGOs and activists have warned about trafficking networks that exploit poverty, migration and weak law enforcement and low convictions, despite official rescue missions or rehab efforts.   In his appeal, Raj Thackeray called upon Fadnavis to take concrete, visible measures rather than discussions and conventions. “Maharashtra expects decisive steps from you, not speeches. Jai Maharashtra,” he signed off.     In October 2023,Sharad Pawar red-flagged ‘missing girls-women’ This is the second major social cause by a political leader, two years after Nationalist Congress Party (SP) President Sharad Pawar had red-flagged nearly 20,000 ‘missing women and girls’ from the state between Jan-May 2023.   In the present instance, Raj Thackeray said that “behind the statistics lies a far more disturbing reality involving organised, inter-state gangs that kidnap children, physically abuse them and force them into begging rings”.   “Little kids are assaulted, made to beg and shifted across states. Groups of children disappear suddenly, and the government appears unable, or unwilling, to grasp the seriousness of what is happening,” said Thackeray in a strong tone.

‘Diamond Prince’

Updated: Jan 13

Amid internal tensions and generational divides, Abhishek Banerjee is testing his mettle as Mamata Banerjee’s heir apparent.

Diamond Prince
West Bengal

Abhishek Banerjee, nephew of Trinamool Congress (TMC) supremo and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, has emerged as a formidable force for some time now. At 37, the three-time Member of Parliament from Diamond Harbour is not only the de facto number two in the party but also a leader with an ambitious vision for Bengal’s future.


His recent public health campaign, Sebaashray, epitomizes his focus on grassroots outreach. Over seven days, this initiative purportedly delivered healthcare to over 100,000 people in Diamond Harbour, underscoring his intent to craft a distinct ‘Diamond Harbour model’ of governance. Whether it is old-age pensions for the constituency’s elderly or his COVID-era interventions, Abhishek’s approach reflects a blend of charisma and meticulous planning. Yet, his growing influence has also exposed rifts within the TMC, raising questions about its future leadership and unity.


Abhishek’s success in Diamond Harbour, which he won with a thumping margin of over 700,000 votes in 2024, bolstered his credentials as a mass leader. However, his lack of administrative experience remains a sticking point. Unlike his aunt, who rose through the ranks as a grassroots organizer before taking the reins of the state, Abhishek’s political career is tethered to his familial ties. Calls for his inclusion in the state government have been met with resistance, both from Mamata herself and the old guard of the party, who view him as a disruptor of the status quo.


His push for a ‘retirement age’ in politics—a subtle jab at the TMC’s aging stalwarts—has only deepened these fissures. Mamata, who has always been wary of ceding control, had unequivocally declared herself to be “the final word” at a party meeting late last year, stifling any speculation of a transition of power. This intra-party tension underscores a generational battle, with the old guard clinging to their positions while younger leaders led by Abhishek advocate professionalizing the party.


Diamond Harbour has become Abhishek’s proving ground, a microcosm of his governance philosophy. His emphasis on efficiency, accountability, and outreach contrasts starkly with the broader TMC governance model, which critics argue suffers from bureaucratic inertia and corruption. This disparity has not gone unnoticed by the opposition, who argue that Abhishek’s initiatives inadvertently expose flaws in Mamata’s state-wide policies.


Moreover, Abhishek’s liberal stance on contentious issues, such as his defence of citizens’ right to protest during the RG Kar Medical College controversy, had earned him plaudits from moderates but alienated party hardliners.


Despite public denials, whispers of a rift between Abhishek and Mamata have grown louder. His abrupt “short hiatus” from party activities in mid-2024 where he cited allegedly pressing medical reasons had come on the heels of appointments to key party positions that sidelined his recommendations. These included the elevation of veterans like Sudip Bandyopadhyay, a leader Abhishek reportedly sought to retire.


His opposition to fielding controversial candidates—many of whom defected from the BJP or were tainted by scandals—further underscores the ideological and strategic differences between the two leaders.


The TMC’s reliance on Mamata’s charisma remains its greatest strength—and its Achilles’ heel. While Abhishek’s initiatives, including the recent Nabo Jowar campaign, have invigorated the party, they have yet to cement his status as an indispensable leader. His efforts to professionalize the TMC’s structure and appeal to Bengal’s youth resonate with a section of the electorate, but risk alienating the old guard who thrive under Mamata’s personality-driven style of politics.


For now, Abhishek remains a prince without a crown, his ambitions tempered by the towering presence of his aunt. Yet his experiments in Diamond Harbour, combined with his growing national profile, suggest that he is not merely content to be the TMC’s heir apparent. That said, he will need to convince Bengal that he can step out of Mamata’s shadow and lead the state into a new era.

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page