top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

‘Diamond Prince’

Updated: Jan 13, 2025

Amid internal tensions and generational divides, Abhishek Banerjee is testing his mettle as Mamata Banerjee’s heir apparent.

Diamond Prince
West Bengal

Abhishek Banerjee, nephew of Trinamool Congress (TMC) supremo and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, has emerged as a formidable force for some time now. At 37, the three-time Member of Parliament from Diamond Harbour is not only the de facto number two in the party but also a leader with an ambitious vision for Bengal’s future.


His recent public health campaign, Sebaashray, epitomizes his focus on grassroots outreach. Over seven days, this initiative purportedly delivered healthcare to over 100,000 people in Diamond Harbour, underscoring his intent to craft a distinct ‘Diamond Harbour model’ of governance. Whether it is old-age pensions for the constituency’s elderly or his COVID-era interventions, Abhishek’s approach reflects a blend of charisma and meticulous planning. Yet, his growing influence has also exposed rifts within the TMC, raising questions about its future leadership and unity.


Abhishek’s success in Diamond Harbour, which he won with a thumping margin of over 700,000 votes in 2024, bolstered his credentials as a mass leader. However, his lack of administrative experience remains a sticking point. Unlike his aunt, who rose through the ranks as a grassroots organizer before taking the reins of the state, Abhishek’s political career is tethered to his familial ties. Calls for his inclusion in the state government have been met with resistance, both from Mamata herself and the old guard of the party, who view him as a disruptor of the status quo.


His push for a ‘retirement age’ in politics—a subtle jab at the TMC’s aging stalwarts—has only deepened these fissures. Mamata, who has always been wary of ceding control, had unequivocally declared herself to be “the final word” at a party meeting late last year, stifling any speculation of a transition of power. This intra-party tension underscores a generational battle, with the old guard clinging to their positions while younger leaders led by Abhishek advocate professionalizing the party.


Diamond Harbour has become Abhishek’s proving ground, a microcosm of his governance philosophy. His emphasis on efficiency, accountability, and outreach contrasts starkly with the broader TMC governance model, which critics argue suffers from bureaucratic inertia and corruption. This disparity has not gone unnoticed by the opposition, who argue that Abhishek’s initiatives inadvertently expose flaws in Mamata’s state-wide policies.


Moreover, Abhishek’s liberal stance on contentious issues, such as his defence of citizens’ right to protest during the RG Kar Medical College controversy, had earned him plaudits from moderates but alienated party hardliners.


Despite public denials, whispers of a rift between Abhishek and Mamata have grown louder. His abrupt “short hiatus” from party activities in mid-2024 where he cited allegedly pressing medical reasons had come on the heels of appointments to key party positions that sidelined his recommendations. These included the elevation of veterans like Sudip Bandyopadhyay, a leader Abhishek reportedly sought to retire.


His opposition to fielding controversial candidates—many of whom defected from the BJP or were tainted by scandals—further underscores the ideological and strategic differences between the two leaders.


The TMC’s reliance on Mamata’s charisma remains its greatest strength—and its Achilles’ heel. While Abhishek’s initiatives, including the recent Nabo Jowar campaign, have invigorated the party, they have yet to cement his status as an indispensable leader. His efforts to professionalize the TMC’s structure and appeal to Bengal’s youth resonate with a section of the electorate, but risk alienating the old guard who thrive under Mamata’s personality-driven style of politics.


For now, Abhishek remains a prince without a crown, his ambitions tempered by the towering presence of his aunt. Yet his experiments in Diamond Harbour, combined with his growing national profile, suggest that he is not merely content to be the TMC’s heir apparent. That said, he will need to convince Bengal that he can step out of Mamata’s shadow and lead the state into a new era.

Comments


bottom of page