top of page

By:

Naresh Kamath

5 November 2024 at 5:30:38 am

Indian Tourists Need a Reputation Reset

India has long taken pride in the philosophy of ‘Atithi Devo Bhava’ - the belief that guests deserve warmth, respect and dignity. It is an idea deeply woven into the country’s cultural imagination, often been projected as a defining Indian value. As millions of Indians travel overseas every year, the conduct of a small but highly visible section of Indian tourists is increasingly shaping how India itself is perceived abroad. The issue is not about a single incident or a handful of viral...

Indian Tourists Need a Reputation Reset

India has long taken pride in the philosophy of ‘Atithi Devo Bhava’ - the belief that guests deserve warmth, respect and dignity. It is an idea deeply woven into the country’s cultural imagination, often been projected as a defining Indian value. As millions of Indians travel overseas every year, the conduct of a small but highly visible section of Indian tourists is increasingly shaping how India itself is perceived abroad. The issue is not about a single incident or a handful of viral videos but a pattern that is drawing notice from hotels, tourism operators and local authorities across the world. The debate gained fresh momentum after reports emerged of a Swiss hotel issuing a notice specifically addressed to Indian guests. The advisory reportedly requested guests not to pack food from breakfast buffets for later consumption and reminded them to maintain silence in corridors and balconies. Hotels routinely issue guidelines. But when a particular nationality becomes the subject of a specific advisory, it inevitably raises larger questions about perception. “It is a sorry state of affairs. Indians, especially in groups, are displaying atrocious behaviour. This was anyway bound to happen,” says Subhash Motwani, founder of Namaste Tourism. Embarrassing Incidents Whether the notice was justified is another separate matter. The question is why such perceptions are emerging in the first place. Recent months have seen several incidents involving Indian tourists gain traction on social media. One widely circulated video showed travellers performing garba on an airport tarmac in Vietnam. Garba is among India’s most vibrant cultural traditions and a source of immense pride for millions. Yet airports are highly regulated spaces where safety protocols and discipline take precedence over celebration. The incident became symbolic of a larger problem. The rise of social media has encouraged some travellers to treat foreign destinations as stages for content creation. Public dancing, loud celebrations, disruptive behaviour and attention-seeking stunts may generate views and engagement online, but they can also leave lasting impressions on locals and fellow tourists. India is hardly the first country to confront such a challenge. During the 1950s and 1960s, American tourists acquired a reputation for arrogance abroad, giving rise to the phrase “Ugly American.” Britain spent decades dealing with the international embarrassment caused by football hooliganism. China faced similar concerns as outbound tourism surged during the early years of the twenty-first century. A nation’s image is shaped not just by its economic achievements and diplomatic influence but also by the behaviour of its citizens overseas. India today finds itself in a similar situation. Indian tourists are now among the most visible traveller groups across Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East. This is, in many ways, a remarkable success story. However, with visibility comes responsibility. Hospitality professionals across destinations frequently point to recurring concerns. Excessive noise, queue-jumping, disregard for local regulations, overcrowding hotel rooms and attempts to bypass established rules through jugaad are among the complaints often cited. Collectively, repeated experiences can create lasting perceptions. The most revealing aspect of the debate is that Indian travellers often display exemplary discipline in countries known for strict law enforcement. In destinations such as Singapore, the UAE, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, compliance with rules is generally high. Complaints tend to emerge more frequently in places perceived as relaxed or lenient. That suggests the challenge is not one of awareness. Most travellers understand the rules perfectly well. The problem is often a mindset that rules can be negotiated when consequences appear unlikely. Changing that mindset is far more important than introducing additional regulations or issuing fresh advisories. Every interaction at an airport, hotel, restaurant, tourist attraction or public transport system contributes to how a country is viewed. These everyday encounters often shape perceptions more powerfully than government campaigns or tourism advertisements. As India stakes its claim to a larger role in the world, its citizens must recognise that national prestige is shaped not only by economic achievements and diplomatic successes, but also by everyday behaviour abroad. The overwhelming majority of Indian tourists travel responsibly and leave behind positive impressions. Their conduct rarely becomes news because courtesy seldom goes viral. Yet a handful of highly visible incidents can overshadow thousands of positive experiences. The challenge is to encourage responsible travel and a greater awareness that behaviour abroad carries consequences beyond the individual. The conduct of Indian citizens overseas should reflect the confidence and values of a nation seeking not merely recognition but enduring respect. (The writer is a senior journalist based in Mumbai. Views personal.)

Dr. Who, Really? The Fascinating Tale of a Title

The title ‘Doctor’ may command respect, but without context, it can dangerously blur the line between knowledge and authority.


 

The title ‘Dr.’ is a small prefix with a big impact. It signifies knowledge, respect, and authority, but also carries significant cultural baggage. In different countries, professions, and social settings, the title balances pride and practicality, formality and informality. The evolution of ‘Dr.’ from medieval lecture halls to modern email signatures is as complex as it is fascinating.

The word Doctor comes from the Latin doctor, meaning ‘teacher.’ It was first used in 13th-century European universities to recognize expertise in the fields of religion, law, and philosophy. Theologians and scholars, often dressed in flowing robes, were among the earliest to earn the title. Medical practitioners adopted it much later, during the Renaissance, when formal medical education started to require serious scholarly effort. By the 19th century, universities had expanded doctoral programs into areas such as science, humanities and education. The title ‘Dr.’ thus became a symbol not just of medical training but of ongoing intellectual pursuit.

 

In today’s world, the title ‘Dr.’ usually indicates that a person has completed a doctoral-level degree. This could be a Ph.D., an M.D., or a professional doctorate in other fields. Medical doctors use the title to show their training in health and patient care. Ph.D. holders use it to reflect their extensive research and academic achievements. However, how the title is used depends on local customs. In the United States, both medical doctors and Ph.D.s commonly use the title in formal and social settings. Still, some Ph.D. holders choose not to use it outside of academic or professional contexts to avoid confusion.

 

In the United Kingdom, the pattern is different: medical doctors and researchers use the title, but surgeons follow a unique tradition of reverting to ‘Mr.’ or ‘Ms.’ once they qualify, a practice seen as a mark of seniority and respect.

 

In Germany, the title ‘Dr.’ is not only strictly protected by law but also highly formalized. People with more than one doctorate may even be known as ‘Dr. Dr.’ and are allowed to include the title on official documents like passports. In technical fields, it has additional layers. Engineers with doctoral degrees are sometimes addressed as ‘Dr.-Ing.’ (short for Doktor-Ingenieur), which amusingly translates to ‘Doctor Engineer.’ The combination sounds like someone who could both diagnose a disease and design the bridge you cross to get to the hospital. But in reality, it’s a proud nod to engineering’s academic rigor. On the other hand, in France, ‘Dr.’ is mainly reserved for medical professionals, and Ph.D. holders are typically called ‘Dr.’ only in university or academic settings.

 

In India, ‘Dr.’ commands great respect but also influences social interactions in interesting ways. Ph.D. holders are often met with the slightly puzzled question, “Oh, you’re not that kind of doctor?” The belief that only medical professionals deserve the prefix can make non-medical doctors hesitant to use it casually. However, a doctoral degree, earned after years of research, setbacks, revisions, and peer reviews, remains a symbol of intellectual rigor. The internal debate many Ph.D.s face of whether to use the title or not reflects a broader tension between seeking validation and avoiding misinterpretation.

 

Adding to the complexity are legal safeguards that vary across countries. In the United States, misusing the title, especially if it implies medical expertise, can result in penalties, although enforcement differs by state. Germany is notably strict, allowing only degree holders from accredited institutions to use the title, with fines for violators. India also has laws in some states to penalize false claims, especially when public safety or medical misrepresentation is involved. These legal boundaries aim to protect trust in professional qualifications, but they also raise a deeper question: Who truly has the right to be called ‘Doctor’?

 

Honorary doctorates introduce some ambiguity. Often awarded for public service or lifelong achievement, they lack the academic rigor of traditional doctorates. Most recipients understand the distinction and avoid using the title officially. Similarly, professionals like chiropractors or clinical psychologists may use ‘Dr.’ only if they have earned a doctoral degree from a recognized institution.

 

The title ‘Dr.’ signals expertise and authority in formal settings, but can feel pretentious in casual ones. While essential in academia or at conferences, it may invite awkward assumptions elsewhere. Many doctors use it selectively, reserving it for CVs or research papers, and skipping it in family WhatsApp groups.

 

These patterns reveal a bigger issue: society's unequal respect for different types of expertise. A doctorate in mathematics or history is as challenging as one in medicine, yet public perception often favours the latter more. This hierarchy isn’t just about misunderstanding but a missed opportunity to recognize the value of various kinds of knowledge. In an era where complex problems, from climate change to artificial intelligence, require input from every field, the title ‘Dr.’ should unite people instead of dividing them.

 

Furthermore, ethical concerns arise when ‘Dr.’ is used without clarifying the field especially in health or policy, where it can mislead. A literature PhD isn’t qualified to advise on vaccines, nor is a surgeon necessarily an expert in virology. In an era of viral misinformation, transparency matters more than titles.

 

As our world becomes more interdisciplinary, the meaning of ‘Dr.’ is also changing. It might come to symbolize not only formal achievement but also a long-term commitment to learning, reasoning, and service. In the future, people may see the title less as a sign of status and more as a promise to uphold the values of critical inquiry and evidence-based thinking.

In the end, ‘Dr.’ is more than just a title; it’s a symbol of curiosity, effort and intellectual bravery. Whether it belongs to a doctor treating patients, a biologist studying genomes, or a historian analysing ancient scripts, it represents a journey made with persistence and purpose.

 

The next time you see someone debating whether to use ‘Dr.’ before their name, remember that it is not just about status but about honouring the pursuit of knowledge and the discipline it demands.

 

(The author is the former Director, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune and Visiting Professor, IIT Bombay. Views personal)


Comments

bottom of page