top of page

By:

Akhilesh Sinha

25 June 2025 at 2:53:54 pm

Congress-Left Rift Exposes Power Games

New Delhi: Cracks widen in I.N.D.I.A. alliance as Congress and Left clash in Kerala/West Bengal polls, prioritizing state power over ideology. History of flip-flops fuels accusations of cynical opportunism, eroding public trust amid national unity facade.   Ahead of the Kerala and West Bengal assembly elections, cracks have emerged between the Congress and Left parties, with both gearing up to clash head-on in the electoral arena. The echoes of this rift reverberated in a recent meeting of...

Congress-Left Rift Exposes Power Games

New Delhi: Cracks widen in I.N.D.I.A. alliance as Congress and Left clash in Kerala/West Bengal polls, prioritizing state power over ideology. History of flip-flops fuels accusations of cynical opportunism, eroding public trust amid national unity facade.   Ahead of the Kerala and West Bengal assembly elections, cracks have emerged between the Congress and Left parties, with both gearing up to clash head-on in the electoral arena. The echoes of this rift reverberated in a recent meeting of the I.N.D.I.A. alliance's parliamentary parties. The Marxist Communist Party (CPI(M)) openly targeted Congress's biggest leader, Leader of opposition in Parliament Rahul Gandhi, exposing deep tensions. Whether it's the Congress-led I.N.D.I.A. alliance or the earlier United Progressive Alliance (UPA), history shows Congress has always fought elections against CPI(M) in Kerala and West Bengal assembly polls. What kind of political ideology is this, where parties unite for Lok Sabha elections but turn adversaries in state assembly contests?   This naturally begs the question that in this game of alliances, are Congress, the Left, and other I.N.D.I.A. bloc constituents indulging in opportunistic politics driven by a thirst for power? Are they playing tricks on the public just to grab the throne? If their alliances were rooted in ideology, they would stick together from Lok Sabha to assembly elections, united by principle.   Flash point The flashpoint came during an I.N.D.I.A. bloc parliamentary meeting in Kerala, originally called to strategize for the Parliament session and forge a united opposition front against the central government. But the discussion swiftly pivoted to escalating differences between Congress and the Left. CPI(M) MPs took strong exception to Rahul Gandhi's recent statement during a Kerala visit, where he accused central agencies like the Enforcement Directorate (ED) of targeting opposition leaders but sparing Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.   In West Bengal, a senior Congress leader revealed the central leadership's calculus that with little to lose, going solo is the smarter play. Post-alliance breakup with the Left, focus shifts to bolstering vote share, not seat-sharing math. TMC and BJP are expected to dominate anyway. After days of silence, CPI(M) general secretary MA Baby accused Congress of drifting from a broad anti-communal unity, insisting his party favors collaboration with like-minded forces but slamming Congress's stance as isolationist.   The analysis Political analysts warn this split could fragment opposition votes, benefiting TMC. Yet they don't rule out informal grassroots understandings between left and congress. In both states, ditching the alliance lets Congress and the Left campaign comfortably, dodging awkward questions from voters. In Kerala, the Left has held power for two straight terms since 2021, breaking a decades-old pattern of alternating every five years between Left and Congress. Riding an anti-incumbency wave, Congress and Rahul Gandhi now eye a comeback, launching direct attacks on CPI(M). This has irked the Left, whose survival hinges solely on Kerala.   If we look at the political background, the I.N.D.I.A. alliance was formed mainly to create a united strategy against the BJP-led NDA. In several states, opposition parties are trying to contest elections together. Electoral processes, unemployment, inflation, and concerns over constitutional institutions are part of the opposition's shared agenda.   Watching this alliance charade ahead of Lok Sabha and assembly polls, the public is baffled that What's the real basis of these tie-ups? Do parties form and break them for keeping in mind the interests of leaders and parties, or based on ideology? Do they consider the welfare of the people and the nation's interests in doing so? Is coalition politics just opportunism masquerading as strategy? Voters deserve answers-will I.N.D.I.A.'s flip-flops erode trust, or can they justify this as pragmatic realism? Until then, the stench of power hunger lingers.

Elections Amid Boycotts, Boycotts Amid Doubt

Updated: Jan 2, 2025

Chad

Chad, a nation in the heart of the Sahel, is holding its first parliamentary elections in over a decade, marking an uneasy step on its proclaimed path to democracy. Officially, this marks the end of a fraught three-year transitional period following the death of longtime ruler Idriss Deby Itno and the ascension of his son, Mahamat Idriss Deby. But for many in the Central African nation, this democratic exercise feels hollow - a theater where the Patriotic Salvation Movement (MPS) seeks to entrench power under the guise of electoral reform.


The elections, while ostensibly a step toward inclusivity, have instead deepened existing fissures. Opposition parties like SuccesMasra’s Transformers and others are boycotting the vote, decrying it as a masquerade that legitimizes the Deby family’s political dynasty. Their boycott reflects a broader crisis stoked by decades of autocracy, mismanagement, and unfulfilled promises of reform.


Chad’s modern political history is a narrative of coups and strongman rule. Since gaining independence from France in 1960, the nation has been shackled by cycles of military takeovers and civilian unrest. Idriss Deby, who seized power in 1990, ruled with an iron fist until his death on the battlefield in 2021 — a dramatic end befitting his militarized tenure. Under Deby, elections were postponed with alarming regularity, and the parliament, last elected in 2011, became a tool for consolidating power rather than a platform for democratic governance.


The transitional period following Idriss Deby’s death brought hope for reform but delivered little. His son, Mahamat Idriss Deby, initially pledged swift elections, only to extend the transitional period in 2022, sparking deadly protests. Opposition leaders and civil society groups accused him of perpetuating his father’s authoritarian legacy, a charge amplified when his government cracked down on dissent, killing over 100 protesters and detaining many more.


Once a reliable ally of the Deby regime, France now finds its influence in Chad (and across Africa) waning. For decades, French troops were stationed in Chad under the guise of fighting terrorism, but critics argue that their presence propped up authoritarian regimes rather than securing peace. After Chad gained independence in 1960, France continued to exert influence through economic ties, military interventions and political backing of successive regimes, including the long-standing rule of Déby. French troops have repeatedly been deployed under the banner of stabilizing the region, most recently as part of Operation Barkhane to combat Islamist insurgencies in the Sahel. However, N’Djamena’s recent decision to sever a military pact with Paris underscores a growing sentiment of anti-French resentment across Francophone Africa.


The elections that will take place at the end of the week have over 1,000 candidates vying for 188 parliamentary seats. The shadow of manipulation looms large. Critics allege that the ruling MPS is using state machinery to rig the process. Chad’s security challenges complicate any hope for free and fair elections. The war in neighbouring Sudan has spilled over into eastern Chad, while Boko Haram continues to wreak havoc around Lake Chad. These crises, coupled with internal repression, create an environment where genuine democratic participation seems impossible.


Adding to these concerns is the government’s clampdown on press freedom. A recent ban on audiovisual content related to the elections has drawn condemnation from international rights groups, who accuse the administration of silencing dissent. Such actions only reinforce the view that Chad’s democracy remains an illusion, a façade carefully maintained to placate international observers while suppressing internal dissent.


As ballots are counted, Chad stands at a crossroads. Will this election signal the start of a genuine democratic transition, or will it merely consolidate the Deby family’s hold on power? The answer carries implications not just for Chad but for the broader Sahel region, where democratic backsliding and authoritarian resurgence threaten fragile gains.

Comments


bottom of page