top of page

By:

Bharati Dubey

17 May 2026 at 1:38:10 am

After Don-3 controversy, Ranveer’s next film goes on floors

Mumbai: After months of attention surrounding his reported exit from Don 3, Ranveer Singh has finally moved on to his next major cinematic venture. The actor’s ambitious survival spectacle Pralay has officially gone on floors in Mumbai today, marking the beginning of filming on one of the most ambitious and scale-driven projects in Indian cinema. Headlined by Ranveer Singh and directed by Jai Mehta, Pralay is an original end-of-the-world action thriller that promises to take audiences into a...

After Don-3 controversy, Ranveer’s next film goes on floors

Mumbai: After months of attention surrounding his reported exit from Don 3, Ranveer Singh has finally moved on to his next major cinematic venture. The actor’s ambitious survival spectacle Pralay has officially gone on floors in Mumbai today, marking the beginning of filming on one of the most ambitious and scale-driven projects in Indian cinema. Headlined by Ranveer Singh and directed by Jai Mehta, Pralay is an original end-of-the-world action thriller that promises to take audiences into a world on the brink of annihilation. Produced by Ananya Birla’s Birla Studios, Hansal Mehta and Sahil Saigal’s True Story Films, and Maa Kasam Films, the film combines large-scale spectacle with a deeply human story of survival, courage and the instinct to fight for what matters most. The film marks Ranveer’s next major motion picture following Dhurandhar and Dhurandhar – The Revenge, which emerged as the highest-grossing film of all time. With Pralay, the actor once again ventures into unexplored cinematic territory, taking on a disruptive new concept that demands both physical intensity and emotional conviction. Ranveer will also serve as a producer on the film. The project comes at an important point in the actor’s career. His reported exit from Don 3 had generated considerable buzz, particularly as he was expected to carry forward one of Indian cinema’s most iconic franchises. With Pralay, Ranveer now turns the page with an entirely original story rather than stepping into another established universe. Joining him is Lokah breakout actress Kalyani Priyadarshan, who plays a pivotal role in the film and brings together another exciting performer from the new generation of Indian talent. For Ananya Birla, Pralay represents Birla Studios’ ambition to push the boundaries of mainstream Indian cinema by collaborating with contemporary creative forces. For True Story Films’ Hansal Mehta and Sahil Saigal, the project reflects their commitment to disruptive storytelling and content-driven cinema. Behind the camera, Jai Mehta leads the ambitious project. His work on Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Story, which he co-directed with Hansal Mehta, and Lootere has earned widespread acclaim. With Pralay, he steps into a significantly larger canvas, bringing together an ensemble of creative and technical talent from India and around the world. Set against the unmistakable pulse and landscape of Mumbai, Pralay follows a relentless journey of survival against the terrifying possibility of an end-of-the-world catastrophe. The film aims to marry breathtaking spectacle with an emotional core, exploring what people are willing to do to survive when the world as they know it begins to collapse. The makers are shooting extensively at live locations in and around Mumbai, embracing the physicality and unpredictability of real-world environments. The approach is designed to add scale, texture and realism to the apocalyptic world while creating an immersive theatrical experience. The film had already undergone several months of highly technical and intensive pre-production before cameras began rolling. Its ambitious mounting and unusual premise have made Pralay one of the most talked-about upcoming projects in Indian cinema.

Europe’s Nuclear Awakening

With America in retreat, Germany and France seek to fortify Europe’s nuclear deterrence.

Germany

Germany’s likely next chancellor, Friedrich Merz, is not known for radical departures in foreign policy. Yet his recent remarks about expanding France’s nuclear umbrella to the rest of Europe reflect the most consequential shift in European security since the end of the Cold War. The continent finds itself at a precarious juncture. With U.S. President Donald Trump openly questioning NATO’s future, Europe must now decide whether it can rely on Washington’s nuclear shield or if it must forge its own.


In an interview with Deutschlandfunk radio, Merz stressed on the need to become stronger together in nuclear deterrence in Europe. His comments came just days after French President Emmanuel Macron pledged to open a debate on extending France’s nuclear deterrent to other European nations. For decades, Europe’s nuclear security has rested on America’s commitment to its NATO allies. Now, Trump’s second presidency has unsettled that foundation.


During the Cold War, the American nuclear umbrella, backed by the doctrine of mutually assured destruction, provided Europe with strategic stability. France and Britain, Western Europe’s only nuclear powers, maintained their arsenals as a national prerogative rather than a collective security mechanism. The idea of a shared European nuclear deterrent never gained traction, largely due to German reluctance. Berlin’s historical aversion to military assertiveness and its obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) ensured that Germany would not seek nuclear weapons of its own.


But with Trump’s foreign policy pivot, Europe faces an uncomfortable reality - an American president who has threatened to abandon NATO allies unwilling to meet their financial obligations.


Merz’s position remains cautious. He insists that any discussions on European nuclear deterrence must “complement the American nuclear umbrella, which we of course want to maintain.” Yet his acknowledgment that Germany cannot rely indefinitely on U.S. protection signals a historic shift in thinking within the German establishment. The far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) has long argued for Germany to acquire its own nuclear weapons, a prospect still unthinkable for mainstream politicians. However, even centrists now recognize that Europe can no longer afford strategic complacency.


Macron has long positioned himself as a champion of European sovereignty. In 2020, he had proposed a strategic dialogue on Europe’s nuclear future, arguing that France’s arsenal could serve broader European security interests. His calls were largely met with polite dismissal in Berlin. Today, the mood has changed. Merz’s openness to discussions suggests that a consensus is forming in Germany’s political mainstream: Europe must assume greater responsibility for its own defence.


Yet any effort to build a European nuclear deterrent will require delicate diplomacy. France’s nuclear doctrine is fiercely independent, designed to serve French interests first. Extending its nuclear umbrella would mean entangling Paris in the defence of countries beyond its borders, something French leaders have traditionally resisted. Moreover, Britain, now outside the European Union, maintains its own independent nuclear arsenal and has not signalled enthusiasm for nuclear-sharing arrangements with the continent.


A Franco-German-British framework would be the logical nucleus of a European deterrent, but London’s reluctance and Paris’s caution complicate matters. However, the more Washington wavers, the stronger the case for Europe to develop an alternative deterrence mechanism.

A serious European nuclear initiative would come at an enormous financial and political cost. France’s arsenal is modest compared to America’s: it possesses around 300 nuclear warheads. Expanding its reach would require massive investment in missile systems, warhead production and delivery mechanisms. Germany, still constrained by post-war pacifism, would have to make an unprecedented leap in its defence spending and strategic doctrine.


Berlin has already taken tentative steps. Merz’s CDU/CSU bloc is in coalition negotiations with the centre-left Social Democrats (SPD), and both parties have signalled support for a major increase in defence spending. This marks a dramatic shift from Germany’s traditional reluctance to invest in hard power. However, building a credible nuclear deterrent will require long-term commitments and a fundamental reassessment of European security priorities. Either way, the days of European strategic passivity are coming to an end.

Comments


bottom of page