top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

Fatal Devotion

Updated: Jan 31, 2025

The stampede at the Mahakumbh Mela in Prayagraj, which claimed at least 30 lives and injured scores more, was an avoidable tragedy. The Uttar Pradesh government, fully aware that tens of millions would gather for the Amrit Snan, had months to prepare. Instead, it failed to control the surging crowds, exposing glaring weaknesses in its ability to manage large-scale events. The disaster not only highlights India’s chronic crowd indiscipline but also raises questions about whether the state’s intelligence agencies ignored potential risks or worse, whether they were blindsided by a deeper conspiracy.


This is not the first time such a catastrophe has occurred at an Indian religious congregation, nor is it likely to be the last. The combination of official complacency, a lack of discipline among Indian crowds, and, potentially, an intelligence lapse, paints a damning picture of administrative incompetence. In 1954, over 800 people died in a similar stampede while in 2013, another 42 perished during the event.


What makes this failure more egregious is that officials knew what was coming. The Maha Kumbh this year was set to be the largest ever, drawing an estimated 400 million devotees due to a rare planetary alignment that made this edition particularly auspicious. The government has poured thousands of crores into the event, yet its crowd management measures proved woefully inadequate.


Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s post-facto orders - relocating street vendors and preventing overcrowding – were steps that should have been implemented pre-emptively before Mauni Amavasya, one of the busiest days of the festival. The lack of proper holding areas, inadequate barricading and insufficient emergency exits turned the Sangam area into a death trap.


Blaming the administration alone, however, would be simplistic. Indian crowds are notoriously undisciplined, often disregarding security instructions in their rush to gain an advantage. The instinct to push forward, disregard barricades and flout regulations is deeply ingrained. Unlike in countries where large gatherings follow strict queuing and movement protocols, crowds in India show no civic sense. Witnesses at the Sangam reported that barricades were broken as devotees surged forward, trampling those in their path. This kind of reckless behaviour is not unique to the Kumbh. Political rallies and festivals across India routinely devolve into chaos because attendees refuse to adhere to basic order.


That said, the government’s responsibility is to anticipate and plan for such behaviour. Beyond administrative incompetence, there is another, more sinister possibility. The timing and nature of the stampede have led some to speculate whether it was more than just an accident. If there was any foul play - whether in the form of a political or extremist attempt, or simply a dangerous prank – will be determined only after the probe. But if true, then this points to an intelligence failure on the part of the Uttar Pradesh government. All said, one thing is clear as the investigation unfolds that the Prayagraj stampede was a failure of governance at multiple levels.

Comments


bottom of page