top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city...

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city will get a ‘Hindu Marathi’ person to head India’s richest civic body, while the Opposition Shiv Sena (UBT)-Maharashtra Navnirman Sena also harbour fond hopes of a miracle that could ensure their own person for the post. The Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) optimism stems from expectations of possible political permutations-combinations that could develop with a realignment of forces as the Supreme Court is hearing the cases involving the Shiv Sena-Nationalist Congress Party this week. Catapulted as the largest single party, the BJP hopes to install a first ever party-man as Mayor, but that may not create history. Way back in 1982-1983, a BJP leader Dr. Prabhakar Pai had served in the top post in Mumbai (then Bombay). Incidentally, Dr. Pai hailed from Udupi district of Karnataka, and his appointment came barely a couple of years after the BJP was formed (1980), capping a distinguished career as a city father, said experts. Originally a Congressman, Dr. Pai later shifted to the Bharatiya Janata Party, then back to Congress briefly, founded the Janata Seva Sangh before immersing himself in social activities. Second Administrator The 2026 Mayoral elections have evoked huge interest not only among Mumbaikars but across the country as it comes after nearly four years since the BMC was governed by an Administrator. This was only the second time in the BMC history that an Administrator was named after April 1984-May 1985. On both occasions, there were election-related issues, the first time the elections got delayed for certain reasons and the second time the polling was put off owing to Ward delimitations and OBC quotas as the matter was pending in the courts. From 1931 till 2022, Mumbai has been lorded over by 76 Mayors, men and women, hailing from various regions, backgrounds, castes and communities. They included Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Parsis, Sikhs, even a Jew, etc., truly reflecting the cosmopolitan personality of the coastal city and India’s financial powerhouse. In 1931-1932, the Mayor was a Parsi, J. B. Boman Behram, and others from his community followed like Khurshed Framji Nariman (after whom Nariman Point is named), E. A. Bandukwala, Minoo Masani, B. N. Karanjia and other bigwigs. There were Muslims like Hoosenally Rahimtoola, Sultan M. Chinoy, the legendary Yusuf Meherally, Dr. A. U. Memon and others. The Christian community got a fair share of Mayors with Joseph A. D’Souza – who was Member of Constituent Assembly representing Bombay Province for writing-approving the Constitution of India, M. U. Mascarenhas, P. A. Dias, Simon C. Fernandes, J. Leon D’Souza, et al. A Jew Elijah Moses (1937-1938) and a Sikh M. H. Bedi (1983-1984), served as Mayors, but post-1985, for the past 40 years, nobody from any minority community occupied the august post. During the silver jubilee year of the post, Sulochana M. Modi became the first woman Mayor of Mumbai (1956), and later with tweaks in the rules, many women ruled in this post – Nirmala Samant-Prabhavalkar (1994-1995), Vishakha Raut (997-1998), Dr. Shubha Raul (March 2007-Nov. 2009), Shraddha Jadhav (Dec. 2009-March 2012), Snehal Ambedkar (Sep. 2014-March 2017). The last incumbent (before the Administrator) was a government nurse, Kishori Pednekar (Nov. 2019-March 2022) - who earned the sobriquet of ‘Florence Nightingale’ of Mumbai - as she flitted around in her full white uniform at the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic, earning the admiration of the citizens. Mumbai Mayor – high-profile post The Mumbai Mayor’s post is considered a crucial step in the political ladder and many went on to become MLAs, MPs, state-central ministers, a Lok Sabha Speaker, Chief Ministers and union ministers. The formidable S. K. Patil was Mayor (1949-1952) and later served in the union cabinets of PMs Jawaharlal Nehru, Lah Bahadur Shastri and Indira Gandhi; Dahyabhai V. Patel (1954-1955) was the son of India’s first Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel; Manohar Joshi (1976-1977) became the CM of Maharashtra, later union minister and Speaker of Lok Sabha; Chhagan Bhujbal (1985-1986 – 1990-1991) became a Deputy CM.

Fatal Vows: Matrimony and Murder in a Changing India

A rise in women accused of killing their husbands is unsettling India's notions of marriage, modernity and empowerment.

Sonam, Muskan, Shivani, Ravina, Radhika – these are names that are making headlines not for gender empowerment, but for alleged betrayal of matrimonial trust. These women from small towns across India stand accused of killing their husbands. Their cases are grimly sensational, not only because of the crimes, but because they upend entrenched assumptions about womanhood in India.


Once unthinkable, the notion of a wife plotting her husband's murder is no longer shocking. The headlines are becoming familiar. Whether the phenomenon is growing or simply reported more often is unclear. But public reactions are telling: disbelief is giving way to weary acceptance.


The accused were, by all accounts, living unremarkable lives - until they weren’t. In some cases, domestic abuse is alleged. In others, motives are chillingly mundane: extramarital affairs, money, revenge. The instinct to excuse female perpetrators as victims first is being tested.


This unsettling trend raises difficult questions. Are these acts signs of empowerment, or the opposite? Experts suggest a complex mix. Unrealistic gender expectations, social stigma, and bottled frustration may drive some women to violence. Psychiatrist Dr. Harish Shetty noted in a recent interview to The Perfect Voice that while such crimes are not new, their context is changing. “Masculinity in women is no longer always used for self-protection but sometimes to inflict harm,” he said. Still, he cautions against false equivalence: for every man killed by a woman, a hundred women fall to male violence.


These are not stories of rebellion, nor of justice but of disruption. They speak to a society in transition, where the traditional roles of victim and perpetrator no longer sit comfortably.


“But certainly, Women today are asking for more as they no longer want to be treated as doormats. They seek emotional, physical and psychological fulfilment. But in this pursuit, many are overtaken by speed and emotional volatility, leading to poor judgement.” adds Shetty.


Even as experts in the field of psychology point out that instant gratification, increase in the pace of lives of people in today’s world and changing psychologies are leading to such heinous crimes, the question that still remains is while there is an option to file a divorce and seek separation in the most peaceful manner, why are women taking the drastic decisions of plotting murders.


Some legal experts anonymously pointed out that while divorce seemed to be a viable option, after divorce the wife could get only half of the husband's salary as alimony. On the other hand if the perpetrator manages to prove the murder to be an accidental death, she would become a class 1 legal heir, husband’s nominee, and she gets the insurance policy, all the assets that legally belong to the deceased. Besides, a divorce procedure is a long process as in India, law tries its best to save the marriage.


Speaking to The Perfect Voice, Advait Helekar, a Mumbai based Advocate practicing Criminal Law said, “Killing is just a part of the larger issue that involves abuse that can be as minor as verbal insult or a slap or further violence that amounts to domestic abuse. Lack of deterrence of law is a key issue that is important to note here. If a husband abuses his wife, she immediately uses law to protect herself. A woman has the option to fall back on Section 498 a or the Domestic violence Act as a remedy to any abuse. A man unfortunately does not have an option other than filing for divorce.”


Helekar further added, “Since women have been subjected to atrocities and have been victims of serious crimes over past decades, the law is justifiably designed in such a way that it doesn’t have a solution to cases where husbands are the victims. The husband is left with just two options, either to be a silent sufferer or seek divorce. Often, the acts of abuse may escalate to the point of murder. Another aspect that merits attention is that the accused, many a time, think that they won’t be caught or simply don’t care.”


Experts agree that such cases aren’t new, but now gain visibility through social media. They also cite a cultural shift: a rise in violent, adulterous themes on OTT platforms may be desensitising viewers and, in some cases, normalising extreme behaviour.


Supreme Court lawyer Nitin Satpute observes that beyond the nature of entertainment consumed today, rising disposable incomes have altered social behaviours. “The psychology of people has changed,” he notes. “Among college students, not having a boyfriend or girlfriend is seen as a matter of shame. Teenagers’ lifestyles are evolving rapidly, and so is society at large,” he told The Perfect Voice.


A lot of campaigns have been done over years against practices like dowry, Sati and the efforts are constantly being made to contribute to women empowerment and eradicate the bad practices in society. However, something seems to be getting misfired.


Satpute further added, “Both men and women are away from each other out of their home, in their own worlds at their workplaces. A little argument or a trivial issue at home, leads to desperately seeking a comfort zone at work places. Hence, extra-marital affairs are on the rise. Such crimes are often high among the age group of 25-35 years. They don’t have the maturity to think of the consequences. Earlier, women used to be at home, their world was confined to their children and their home. Women empowerment is a must for a better society. Women must move out, get educated, be independent, however, today’s fast lives where everyone is on their own are leading to other problems in society.”


Everything boils down to another important question leading to another complex issue and that is- why are marriages failing in India?


Mumbai-based Family Court Advocate Manasi Beri observes that patience and tolerance used to be the backbone of every marriage earlier.


“Today, neither men nor women seem to have the patience they once did. Even people in their sixties are filing for divorce. Many have reached a point of emotional saturation where meaningful dialogue is no longer possible. Another factor is the evolving discourse around gender equality which some interpret it too literally. No matter how much a woman earns or how successful she becomes, it is often said that only a woman can truly turn a flat into a home. Hired help cannot replicate the emotional investment we bring to our own spaces. Many marriages are faltering because neither partner is willing to let go of their ego. No one wants to take a step back to build something lasting. The conflict has become a standoff over the question: ‘Why me? Why should I be the one to sacrifice?’”


Social activists offer a different lens: these cases may reflect deep discomfort with women defying traditional roles. Often overlooked is the fact that the accused women rarely act alone—men are frequently complicit, if not the instigators.


Whether these crimes are a dark byproduct of empowerment or eruptions of long-suppressed frustration remains unclear. But the troubling question persists: what drives someone like Sonam Raghuvanshi to orchestrate her husband’s murder during wedding festivities in Madhya Pradesh and carry it out in distant Meghalaya, rather than walk up to her parents and say, “I am not willing to marry this man.”

Comments


bottom of page