top of page

By:

Dr. V.L. Dharurkar

12 February 2025 at 2:53:17 pm

From Frost to Thaw

After years of diplomatic chill, India and Canada have attempted a strategic reset driven as much by geopolitics and trade anxieties as by a desire to repair a damaged partnership. For nearly three years relations between India and Canada resembled a prolonged winter. Yet, the visit of Canada’s Prime Minister, Mark Carney to India at the start of the Month suggests that the thaw may finally have begun. If the past few years were marked by recrimination and mistrust, the present moment hints...

From Frost to Thaw

After years of diplomatic chill, India and Canada have attempted a strategic reset driven as much by geopolitics and trade anxieties as by a desire to repair a damaged partnership. For nearly three years relations between India and Canada resembled a prolonged winter. Yet, the visit of Canada’s Prime Minister, Mark Carney to India at the start of the Month suggests that the thaw may finally have begun. If the past few years were marked by recrimination and mistrust, the present moment hints at a cautious but deliberate reset. Both sides have shown a keenness to replace acrimony with pragmatism. The chill began during the tenure of Justin Trudeau, whose government publicly alleged that Indian agents may have been involved in violent activities on Canadian soil. India rejected the accusations as unfounded and politically motivated. The dispute triggered tit-for-tat diplomatic expulsions, the freezing of high-level dialogue and an atmosphere of mutual suspicion. For two countries that had long prided themselves on democratic affinity, shared Commonwealth ties and large diaspora links, the rapid deterioration was remarkable. Canada is home to one of the world’s largest Indian diasporas, numbering well over a million people. Trade and educational links have grown steadily since the late twentieth century. Canadian universities attract tens of thousands of Indian students each year, while Indian professionals and entrepreneurs have contributed significantly to Canada’s economic life. These human connections had long acted as ballast in the relationship. But politics, as ever, can overwhelm social ties. Symbolic Weight Carney’s New Delhi visit therefore carries symbolic weight. A former governor of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, he has entered politics with a reputation for technocratic competence rather than ideological theatrics. His five-day visit to India, from late February to early March, was carefully choreographed to signal renewal. Beginning in Mumbai, India’s commercial capital, he met industrialists, bankers and policymakers, emphasising economic cooperation as the cornerstone of the revived relationship. India today is among the world’s fastest-growing major economies, with ambitions to expand its industrial base, modernise infrastructure and transition towards cleaner sources of energy. Canada, meanwhile, possesses abundant natural resources, technological expertise and capital. The two economies are complementary in ways that diplomacy had recently obscured. One of the most notable outcomes of the visit was a long-term agreement on uranium supply. Canada’s mining giant Cameco and India’s Department of Atomic Energy concluded a ten-year deal worth roughly $2.6bn to supply more than 20m pounds of uranium. For India, which is expanding its civil nuclear programme to meet rising energy demand while limiting carbon emissions, reliable access to uranium is strategically important. The agreement will help fuel a new generation of small and medium reactors, which India sees as crucial to its energy transition. Canada, for its part, is among the world’s leading producers of uranium. Renewed nuclear cooperation therefore reflects not only diplomatic reconciliation but also the convergence of economic interests. Previous agreements between the two countries had faltered amid political tensions. This time both governments have emphasised implementation and timely delivery. Trade Boost Trade, too, looms large in the reset. Bilateral commerce between India and Canada currently hovers around $10bn to $12bn annually, a modest figure for economies of their scale. Both governments have spoken of raising that number dramatically, potentially to $50bn by the end of the decade. Negotiations on a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), long stalled, have been revived with renewed urgency. Here global geopolitics provides an additional incentive. The increasingly protectionist trade policies of the United States under Donald Trump have unsettled many of Washington’s traditional partners. Tariff threats and economic nationalism have encouraged countries to diversify their commercial relationships. India and Canada, both heavily exposed to the American market, now see advantage in strengthening bilateral trade and investment as a hedge against volatility emanating from Washington. Education and innovation are another pillar of the renewed engagement. Canadian universities are exploring the possibility of establishing campuses in India, enabling Indian students to access Canadian education without leaving the country. Joint research programmes and technological collaboration are expected to deepen intellectual ties that already run deep. Beyond economics lies a broader strategic calculation. The Indo-Pacific has become the central theatre of twenty-first-century geopolitics. As China’s influence expands across Asia, many countries are seeking new partnerships to preserve a balance of power and maintain open sea lanes. India has positioned itself as a leading voice in this effort, promoting a vision of a free, stable and inclusive Indo-Pacific region. Strategic Dynamics Canada, though geographically distant, has begun to pay greater attention to the region’s strategic dynamics. Collaboration with India could therefore form part of a wider network involving countries such as Australia, Japan and New Zealand. For Ottawa, engagement with New Delhi offers a way to remain relevant in Asia’s shifting geopolitical landscape. For India, Canadian support adds another partner to its growing Indo-Pacific coalition. Yet enthusiasm should be tempered with realism. Diplomatic resets are easier to announce than to sustain. The political sensitivities that strained relations in the past have not vanished entirely. Canada’s domestic politics, particularly debates surrounding diaspora activism, remain complex. India, meanwhile, is unlikely to tolerate external criticism on matters it considers internal. Managing these differences will require careful diplomacy and mutual restraint. Nevertheless, the symbolism of the present moment matters. The revival of high-level dialogue, the signing of concrete economic agreements and the visible warmth between leaders all suggest a shared desire to turn the page. In the grand sweep of history, relations between India and Canada have always rested on deeper foundations than temporary political quarrels. If the current reset succeeds, it could transform a once-strained partnership into one of the more promising relationships in the Indo-Pacific era. (The writer is a foreign affairs expert. Views personal.)

Forests for Sale

A raging fight over 400 acres of scrub forest reveals the Congress-led Telangana government’s conflicted vision for Hyderabad’s future.

Telangana
Telangana

On the western fringes of Hyderabad, an unassuming patch of green in the fast-expanding Financial District has become the site of a tense standoff. Kancha Gachibowli, a 400-acre urban forest adjoining the University of Hyderabad (UoH), is rich in biodiversity, rocky outcrops and controversy. As the Congress-led Telangana government pushes to auction the land to private developers in a bid to bolster its IT economy, students, faculty and civil society have rallied to protect what they call the city’s “last lung space.” While the state sees real estate gold, Hyderabad’s citizens see ecological heritage.


The government claims that transforming this forested tract into an IT park could net up to Rs. 50,000 crore in investments and create half a million jobs. Already, the Telangana Industrial Infrastructure Corporation has drawn up plans, promising to preserve landmark rock formations like the ‘Mushroom Rock’ as green pockets amid glass-and-concrete towers.


But the resistance is equally firm. The land, though never officially notified as a forest, forms part of the larger ecological envelope of the UoH campus. It is home to myriad species of birds, reptiles and mammals. Environmentalists and academics argue that losing this space would deal a fatal blow to Hyderabad’s fragile urban ecology. Urban forests such as Kancha Gachibowli regulate microclimates, sequester carbon and offer respite in a city where heatwaves and water scarcity are fast becoming the norm.


The matter has now escalated to the Supreme Court, which has directed a halt to all deforestation and development activities, and ordered a central empowered committee to inspect the site. The state’s refusal to allow UoH faculty and students to conduct an independent ecological damage assessment before the central team’s visit has only deepened mistrust. The ministers involved argue they are bound by the court’s directives. Protestors see it as yet another attempt to suppress scrutiny.


Adding to the friction is the heavy police presence on campus, with prohibitory orders in place and cases filed against protestors. Two students remain in custody. Far from defusing the situation, the Congress government has adopted the coercive playbook of its predecessors: criminalise dissent, delay dialogue, and hide behind procedure.


The irony is thick. This is the same Congress party that, in opposition, castigated the previous Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) government for its opaque land deals and lopsided development. Now in power, it appears to have inherited not just the furniture but also the worst instincts of its forerunners.


When the University of Hyderabad was established in 1974, it was allocated 2,300 acres. Over the years, successive governments have chipped away at that parcel - first for a telephone exchange, then a bus depot, a sports stadium, and even an IIT campus. The 400 acres at Kancha Gachibowli were handed over to a private sports firm in 2003, reclaimed in 2006 after non-utilisation, and have been in legal limbo since. The Supreme Court has reaffirmed the state government’s ownership, but the lack of proper demarcation and the absence of forest notification has left the land in a legal and ecological grey zone.


The Telangana government would do well to consider a more nuanced approach. Rather than treating the 400 acres as dead capital, it could embrace a vision of inclusive urban planning that balances economic ambitions with ecological imperatives. Designating Kancha Gachibowli as a protected urban forest, opening it up for educational and ecological tourism, and integrating it into the broader developmental plan of the city could offer a compromise that respects both growth and green.


In the battle for Kancha Gachibowli, the stakes go beyond Hyderabad’s skyline. They touch upon how India’s cities imagine their future - whether as concrete jungles chasing capital, or as liveable spaces that cherish their natural inheritance. Politically, the episode is fast turning into a litmus test for the Congress government. If it squanders public trust for short-term real estate windfalls, it will only hasten its own political erosion.

Comments

bottom of page