top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

Fortress India

The passage of the Immigration and Foreigners Bill, 2025, is a long-overdue correction to India’s porous borders and lax enforcement of immigration laws. The bill streamlines and modernizes immigration policies, ensuring national security while allowing legitimate visitors for business, education, and healthcare. Predictably, the opposition, particularly the Trinamool Congress, has cried foul, portraying it as an attack on so-called secularism. Beneath their rhetoric lies decades of political appeasement that have compromised India’s security.


The new law consolidates four archaic pieces of legislation that no longer serve India’s interests in an era of globalization and digital governance. It tightens border controls, mandates the tracking of foreigners overstaying their visas, and introduces harsh penalties for illegal entry. The law is a clear message that India will no longer be a free-for-all sanctuary for infiltrators.


Much of the resistance to this bill comes predictably from parties that have historically benefited from turning a blind eye to illegal immigration. The Trinamool Congress, which governs West Bengal, has long been accused of shielding infiltrators for vote-bank politics. The numbers speak for themselves. South 24 Parganas, a known hotspot for illegal migration, has seen a surge in fake Aadhaar cards, enabling undocumented immigrants to blend into the system undetected. Despite multiple letters and meetings, the West Bengal government has refused to act decisively. The obvious reason being that these illegal migrants, primarily from Bangladesh, form a critical voter base for the ruling party.


The Congress and other so-called ‘secular’ parties will frame this bill as an attack on humanitarian principles. But one need only look at Europe to understand the perils of a lax immigration policy. Hungary, for instance, has faced an influx of migrants that has overwhelmed its welfare system and led to sharp rises in crime and social tensions. Even Western European nations that once prided themselves on open borders, such as France and Germany, have been forced to acknowledge the strain of unchecked immigration. If Europe, with its vast resources, has found the situation untenable, then India must be even more vigilant.


Rohingya refugees and Bangladeshi infiltrators are not just an economic liability but also a security risk, fostering demographic shifts in border states and fueling ethnic and religious tensions. The bill ensures that India has up-to-date records of every foreigner entering the country, thus reducing internal security threats.


Critics argue this ‘xenophobic’ law leads to profiling and harassment of certain communities. This is a tired argument that ignores realities of border security. The bill does not target any religion or nationality - it targets illegality. This bill is a decisive step towards securing India’s borders and sovereignty. It is a recognition that a nation’s first duty is to its own citizens. The days of lax enforcement and political appeasement are over. The strident protests of the Opposition mean it has prioritized votes above the national interest. The message is clear: India welcomes guests, not gatecrashers.

Comments


bottom of page