top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Fractured Nation

Updated: Jan 21, 2025

The scorched earth of Rakhine, in the shadow of the Arakan Army, serves as a grisly tableau of Myanmar’s unravelling state.

Myanmar

The latest airstrike by Myanmar’s military junta, killing 28 people (including nine children) adds another harrowing chapter to a conflict with far-reaching geopolitical ramifications. This time, the victims were family members of junta soldiers, detained by the Arakan Army (AA), an ethnic armed group that has emerged as a dominant force in the region.


The airstrike, which devastated a temporary detention site in Mrauk-U Township, underscores both the junta’s disregard for civilian life and the Arakan Army’s ascendancy in Myanmar’s power structure. As the AA consolidates its grip over much of Rakhine, the state’s descent into chaos highlights the broader fragmentation of Myanmar since the military coup in February 2021, which toppled Aung San Suu Kyi’s civilian government.


The Arakan Army, a Rakhine Buddhist ethnic armed organization, has become a most potent force, displacing Myanmar’s military, or Tatmadaw, from most of Rakhine. It now controls 14 of the state’s 17 townships, leaving the Tatmadaw clinging to coastal outposts like Sittwe, Kyaukpyu and Munaung. The AA’s dominance extends to neighbouring Chin state, with the capture of Paletwa. From these strongholds, the group appears to be establishing a de facto independent administration under the United League of Arakan, its political wing.


The AA’s strategic gains are no mere local triumph. By seizing the Tatmadaw’s Western Command Headquarters and advancing toward key weapons manufacturing hubs in central Myanmar, the group is undermining the junta’s military-industrial complex. Its control of the border with Bangladesh has made Rakhine the first fully rebel-held frontier in Myanmar, setting a dangerous precedent for other ethnic armed organizations (EAOs).


Bangladesh, already overwhelmed by the Rohingya refugee crisis and its own internal political turmoil, now faces incursions by the AA, raising fears of a direct confrontation between Dhaka and the Arakan Army.


India, too, is watching the situation with growing alarm. The Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project, a crucial corridor connecting Kolkata to India’s northeast via Rakhine, hangs in the balance. For New Delhi, the AA’s control over Rakhine poses a dual threat: the potential derailment of its infrastructure investments and the spectre of Chinese influence filling any power vacuum.


China, for its part, has already intervened to broker ceasefires between the junta and various EAOs, seeking to protect its economic and strategic interests in Myanmar, particularly in the resource-rich Shan state. But Beijing’s efforts have done little to stabilize Rakhine.


The region has long been a flashpoint, from the colonial-era marginalization of ethnic minorities to the military’s violent campaigns against the Rohingya, culminating in a genocide that forced nearly a million people to flee to Bangladesh in 2017.


The AA’s present ascendancy has been buoyed by a rare unity among Myanmar’s EAOs, which have joined forces with the predominantly Bamar People’s Defence Forces (PDFs) to resist the junta. This alliance marks a departure from Myanmar’s fractious ethnic landscape, where competing interests have often undermined collective action.


The AA’s rise also reveals the Tatmadaw’s weakness. Besieged on multiple fronts, the junta has resorted to indiscriminate airstrikes and artillery bombardments, tactics that have only deepened popular resistance. Over 3.5 million people have been displaced since the coup, and the United Nations warns of an impending famine in Rakhine as fighting disrupts commerce and agriculture.


The AA’s victories may herald a new era for Rakhine, but they pose uncomfortable questions for the region. An emboldened Arakan Army could embolden other EAOs, further eroding Myanmar’s territorial integrity.


Western sanctions against the junta have failed to weaken its grip, while ASEAN’s mediation efforts have been toothless. For the junta, the AA’s rise is a humiliating reminder of its diminishing control. For the people of Rakhine, who have borne the brunt of both state violence and rebel ambitions, liberation remains a distant dream. And for Myanmar as a whole, the conflict signals a slow, inexorable march toward disintegration.

Comments


bottom of page