top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

From Foes to Friends

Updated: Apr 1, 2025

Once yesterday’s enemy, Japan is fast becoming America’s strongest military partner in the Pacific to counter China’s growing assertiveness.

Japan

Few transformations in geopolitics are as striking as Japan’s evolution from a bitter wartime adversary of the United States into one of its most critical military allies. In the shadow of China’s expanding military presence, this alliance has entered a new phase, marked by deeper military cooperation and strategic realignments. With U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s recent visit to Tokyo underscoring the urgency of deterrence, Japan is shedding its post-war pacifism and embracing a more assertive defence posture.


For much of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Japan’s military expansionism placed it at odds with both the U.S. and China. The Sino-Japanese War (1894-95) saw Japan dismantle Qing China’s hold over Korea and seize Taiwan, laying the groundwork for its imperial ambitions. The early 20th century witnessed Japan’s growing regional dominance, culminating in its invasion of Manchuria in 1931 and the full-scale war with China in 1937. At the same time, Tokyo’s aggression alarmed Washington, leading to sanctions that helped precipitate Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. The Pacific War that followed ended with Japan’s catastrophic defeat and U.S. occupation.


In the post-war years, Washington sought to rebuild Japan as a bulwark against communism. The 1951 U.S.-Japan Security Treaty formalized America’s military presence in the country, even as Japan adopted a pacifist constitution under Article 9, renouncing war as a means of settling disputes. While this kept Japan’s defence policy restrained for decades, the growing threats posed by China and North Korea have forced Tokyo to rethink its strategic stance.


Japan’s security doctrine has undergone a radical transformation in recent years. Former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe spearheaded efforts to reinterpret the country’s pacifist constitution, enabling its Self-Defence Forces (SDF) to play a more active role in collective defence. Under Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, Tokyo has further deepened military ties with the U.S., committing to a record increase in defence spending and bolstering its capabilities to counter Chinese aggression in the East China Sea and the Taiwan Strait.


Hegseth’s recent announcement of a “war-fighting headquarters” in Japan is the latest indication of this shift. The upgraded U.S. military command in Japan, coupled with the launch of the Japan Joint Operations Command (JJOC), signals a move toward greater operational integration between the two allies. Washington and Tokyo are also expanding joint missile development, strengthening logistical support for warships and aircraft, and enhancing Japan’s military presence on its southwestern islands - strategic areas near Taiwan and disputed waters with China.


These moves are a direct response to China’s increasing assertiveness. Beijing’s military build-up, frequent incursions into Japan’s airspace, and its growing naval presence in the Pacific have alarmed policymakers in both Tokyo and Washington. China’s claims over Taiwan, a potential flashpoint for U.S.-China confrontation, have further galvanized Japan to step up its military preparedness. As Hegseth bluntly put it, Japan would be on the frontlines of any conflict in the western Pacific.


The deepening of U.S.-Japan military cooperation marks a historic shift, but entails risks. Japan’s military resurgence has provoked criticism from China, which views Tokyo’s strategic realignment as part of a broader U.S. effort to encircle and contain Beijing. The prospect of Japan playing a more active role in regional conflicts, particularly in a Taiwan crisis, also raises concerns about escalation.


At the same time, Japan remains wary of America’s long-term commitment. The Trump administration’s “America First” policy and threats of trade tariffs has unsettled Tokyo, prompting concerns about the reliability of the alliance. While Hegseth’s reassurances reaffirm Washington’s focus on the Indo-Pacific, Japan has been hedging its bets by diversifying its defence partnerships, strengthening security ties with Australia, India and NATO countries.


While the U.S.-Japan alliance remains the bedrock of security in the Pacific, its transformation underscores that the era of Japan’s post-war pacifism is over. As China flexes its military muscles, Japan - once America’s fiercest enemy - is emerging as one of its most indispensable allies in maintaining regional stability.

Comments


bottom of page