top of page

By:

Rajendra Joshi

3 December 2024 at 3:50:26 am

Kolhapur’s Pilgrimage Paradox

Kolhapur: Even as the state government clears the first tranche of Rs 1,500 crore under an ambitious Rs 5,000-crore plan for the development of Kolhapur as a major pilgrimage centre, the ground reality for devotees tells a far less reassuring story. Each month, the temple’s donation boxes swell by an estimated Rs two crore, while crores more lie parked in bank deposits earning interest. Yet, for the thousands who arrive daily to seek the blessings of Goddess Ambabai, the journey to the...

Kolhapur’s Pilgrimage Paradox

Kolhapur: Even as the state government clears the first tranche of Rs 1,500 crore under an ambitious Rs 5,000-crore plan for the development of Kolhapur as a major pilgrimage centre, the ground reality for devotees tells a far less reassuring story. Each month, the temple’s donation boxes swell by an estimated Rs two crore, while crores more lie parked in bank deposits earning interest. Yet, for the thousands who arrive daily to seek the blessings of Goddess Ambabai, the journey to the sanctum begins with an ordeal—walking barefoot on scorching roads under an unforgiving sun. With temperatures in Kolhapur soaring past 40°C, asphalt and concrete roads leading to the temple radiate intense heat. For devotees—many of whom travel hundreds of kilometres—this translates into a painful trek, quite literally. The situation is particularly harsh for senior citizens, who are often seen hopping from one foot to another in a desperate attempt to avoid the burning surface. In such conditions, the absence of even basic protective arrangements raises uncomfortable questions about priorities in pilgrimage infrastructure. Stark Irony The irony is stark. While policy blueprints and financial approvals move through bureaucratic channels, immediate, low-cost interventions remain unaddressed. Simple measures—laying heat-resistant carpets along key approach roads, ensuring regular water sprinkling to cool surfaces, and erecting temporary shaded canopies—could significantly ease the devotees’ distress. Such steps do not demand massive outlays, only administrative initiative. As chairperson of the temple trust, the Kolhapur District Collector is uniquely positioned to catalyse this response. The summer vacation period only amplifies the challenge. Families flock to Kolhapur in large numbers, often combining visits to Ambabai temple with pilgrimages to nearby shrines such as Jyotiba. The surge in footfall transforms the temple precinct into a sea of humanity. Yet, the infrastructure has failed to keep pace. A similar concern was flagged last year as well, with limited, ad hoc relief provided by a few local traders who laid makeshift carpets for their customers. This year, however, little appears to have changed. Humane Pilgrimage The issue, therefore, is not merely administrative—it is collective. The responsibility to ensure a humane pilgrimage experience cannot rest solely with the temple trust or the municipal corporation. Traders and business associations operating in the temple vicinity, who benefit from the steady influx of devotees, must also step forward. Kolhapur has historically demonstrated remarkable civic spirit during festivals such as Navratri and the Rathotsav. Extending that ethos to provide shaded pathways during peak summer would be a meaningful gesture of reciprocity. Across India, leading pilgrimage centres have invested in visitor comfort—air-conditioned waiting areas, chilled drinking water, and clean sanitation facilities are increasingly the norm. In many cases, nominal user charges are levied, and devotees are willing to pay for such services. Kolhapur risks falling behind if it does not address these gaps with urgency. At its core, the issue is one of dignity. Devotion should not come at the cost of physical distress. Until basic amenities are ensured, the promise of transforming Kolhapur into a premier religious tourism hub will remain incomplete. For now, the pilgrim’s experience continues to echo a troubling refrain: first the searing heat beneath the feet, and only then, the grace of the goddess.

Geoffrey Hinton: AI’s Quiet Pioneer

Updated: Oct 22, 2024

Geoffrey Hinton

Geoffrey Hinton, tall, soft-spoken, with an almost monk-like reverence for the unseen mechanics of the mind, has long been known by the media moniker of the ‘Godfather of Artificial Intelligence.’ The rest of the world is only just beginning to catch up to his trailblazing work in machine learning. Hinton’s Nobel Prize for Physics, awarded this week (alongside another AI pioneer John Hopfield) after decades of foundational work in neural networks, marks a pivotal moment not just for his career but for the sprawling, rapidly accelerating world of artificial intelligence.


Born in London in 1947, Hinton’s intellectual roots run deep and illustrious. His great-great-grandfather, George Boole, pioneered Boolean logic - a mathematical framework essential to the design of modern computers. Yet, Hinton’s initial interest was not in machines but in understanding the intricacies of the human brain. He pursued a degree in psychology and later a PhD in artificial intelligence at the University of Edinburgh, where his fascination with how the human brain processes information collided with his growing curiosity about machines that could mimic it.


In the 1980s, when artificial intelligence was still an esoteric and somewhat discredited field - languishing from the so-called ‘AI winter’ - Hinton, together with David Rumelhart and Ronald J. Williams, pioneered the idea of backpropagation. It was a method that allowed neural networks to adjust themselves by learning from their errors, much like how humans refine their thoughts and behaviours. This breakthrough would become the bedrock of deep learning, the branch of AI that has since revolutionized fields as diverse as language translation, medical diagnostics, and autonomous driving.


To understand the significance of Hinton’s contribution, one must travel back to the mid-20th century, when AI was still in its infancy. Visionaries like Marvin Minsky and John McCarthy were conceptualizing machines that could ‘think’ in the way humans did. The 1956 Dartmouth Conference, considered the birth of AI, united experts to explore intelligent machines. However, Minsky’s vision of machines rivalling human intelligence soon hit the limits of computation and algorithms. By the 1970s, AI’s unfulfilled promises led to widespread disillusionment.


But in the mid-1980s, Hinton was already working against the tide. As others dismissed the notion that machines could truly learn, Hinton dug into the mechanics of the brain - its neurons, synapses, and intricate processes of pattern recognition- and began to replicate these systems in code. His method of using layered, interconnected nodes, later known as artificial neural networks, sought to mirror the complexity of the human brain. For decades, his work existed in the periphery of mainstream computer science, appreciated by few but misunderstood by many.


Alongside him were contemporaries like Yann LeCun, who applied neural networks to the field of computer vision, and Yoshua Bengio, whose work in natural language processing gave machines the ability to understand and generate human speech. Together, these three have often been referred to as the ‘Trinity’ of deep learning, their contributions laying the groundwork for the explosion of AI applications in the 21st century.


By the 2010s, their patience had paid off. With the advent of big data and exponential increases in computing power, Hinton’s neural networks began to outperform traditional machine learning methods. In 2012, Hinton and his students at the University of Toronto stunned the world by winning the ImageNet competition, a milestone that demonstrated the practical viability of deep learning algorithms. Suddenly, Hinton’s work was no longer a niche academic pursuit but a cornerstone of Silicon Valley’s tech revolution.

The implications of Hinton’s work now permeate nearly every facet of life. Algorithms based on neural networks assist radiologists in detecting early signs of cancer, predict stock market trends with uncanny accuracy, and power the virtual assistants we speak to every day.


Hinton’s Nobel Prize marks both a scientific triumph and a moment of reflection. When Marvin Minsky co-founded the MIT AI lab in the 1950s, the vision of intelligent machines was linked to utopian ideals. Now, as AI integrates into key areas like healthcare and criminal justice, the question shifts from “can machines think?” to “should they?” Once optimistic, Hinton, at 76, now calls for caution in a world increasingly shaped by AI.

Comments


bottom of page