top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Poriborton!

BJP candidate for Bhabanipur and Nandigram constituencies Suvendu Adhikari, who defeated West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in the prestigious Bhabanipur seat, shows a certificate of election on Monday. Pic: PTI Mumbai: The Bengali word “Poriborton” translates to profound change. While it was initially fiercely utilized as the central battle cry for the assembly elections in West Bengal, the final tally from all five state elections reveals that the spirit of the word has swept across...

Poriborton!

BJP candidate for Bhabanipur and Nandigram constituencies Suvendu Adhikari, who defeated West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in the prestigious Bhabanipur seat, shows a certificate of election on Monday. Pic: PTI Mumbai: The Bengali word “Poriborton” translates to profound change. While it was initially fiercely utilized as the central battle cry for the assembly elections in West Bengal, the final tally from all five state elections reveals that the spirit of the word has swept across the entire nation. The recent electoral outcomes have fundamentally rewritten the established rules of Indian democracy. From a massive anti-incumbency wave overturning fifteen years of rule in Bengal, to a political novice shattering a six-decade Dravidian stronghold in Tamil Nadu, and the Congress-led alliance successfully dislodging the incumbent Left in Kerala, the electorate has delivered a highly decisive mandate. Alongside sweeping consolidations of power in Assam and Puducherry, these results collectively disrupt historical traditions and reshape the national political landscape for years to come. Titan Toppled In West Bengal, the call for Poribartan finally resonated with enough force to bring down a formidable political fortress. A relentless anti-incumbency wave has overturned Mamata Banerjee’s fifteen-year rule. For a decade and a half, the Trinamool Congress maintained an iron grip on the state’s narrative, having previously ousted the Left Front on the very same promise of sweeping change. The defeat of the incumbent government signifies a monumental shift in the political psychology of Bengal. The electorate, driven by an urgent desire for a new direction, has dismantled a deeply entrenched political machine. This result forces a complete recalibration of power dynamics in eastern India, leaving a massive political vacuum that victorious forces will now rush to fill, fundamentally altering the governance trajectory of the state. Duopoly Shattered Equally seismic is the political earthquake that has struck Tamil Nadu. For six decades, the state’s political arena was fiercely guarded by a seemingly unbreakable Dravidian duopoly, with power alternating predictably between established giants. However, the emergence of the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam, led by cinema icon Thalapathy Vijay, has dismantled this historical dominance. By emerging as the single-largest party in the assembly count, the TVK has achieved what generations of politicians deemed impossible. This is not merely a change in government but a profound cultural and political revolution. The voters of Tamil Nadu have overwhelmingly opted for a fresh narrative, proving that star power coupled with an untested political promise can still upend deeply rooted ideological empires, ushering in an entirely new era of leadership. Absolute Dominance Meanwhile, the political landscape in the Northeast has witnessed a different kind of decisive mandate. In Assam, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has not only retained power but has emerged significantly stronger, securing a third consecutive term. This victory effectively cements an aggressive regional hegemony and signals the near-total ouster of the Congress party from Assam’s mainstream politics. The result brings an ironclad continuity to the state, allowing the incumbent administration to push forward its agenda without any formidable legislative friction, while leaving the state’s oldest party desperately searching for political relevance. Pendulum Swings In Kerala, the electorate has delivered a decisive blow to the incumbent Left Democratic Front. The Congress-led United Democratic Front has successfully dislodged the government, claiming a vital victory in a state renowned for its fiercely contested, oscillating elections. This resurgence of the UDF injects critical new life into the state’s Congress machinery, drastically altering the governance model in Kerala. The outcome firmly proves that the traditional pendulum of Kerala politics still possesses the momentum to swing back fiercely against the incumbent, denying the Left a continued and uninterrupted grip on power. Comfortable Continuity Further down the coast in Puducherry, the mandate favored stability within a rapidly changing national map. The National Democratic Alliance government, led by the AINRC, comfortably secured its return to power. This victory ensures that the NDA maintains a crucial administrative foothold in the southern union territory, providing a steady anchor for its regional allies amid the broader national churn. When viewed collectively, these independent state results weave a complex tapestry that will inevitably reshape national politics. The fall of towering regional satraps in West Bengal and the disruption of the historic Dravidian stronghold in Tamil Nadu indicate a national electorate that is deeply restless and entirely unafraid to discard legacy systems. For the national opposition, the revival in Kerala offers a much-needed glimmer of hope, though it is heavily overshadowed by the existential crisis they face in Assam. The spectacular rise of new regional entities introduces a fresh, highly unpredictable variable into the national coalition arithmetic ahead of future general elections. Ultimately, the political center of gravity has fundamentally shifted, proving that “Poribartan” is no longer just a localized slogan, but the defining new reality of the country.

Guns, Not Roses: Revisiting The St.Valentine’s Day Massacre

Among the more ‘interesting’ things to have happened on February 14 was the infamous 1929 gangland massacre in a Chicago garage, where seven men of the ‘Bugs’ Moran gang were allegedly gunned down by Al Capone’s men, posing as policemen.


The crime has since been cemented in American urban lore as the ‘St. Valentine’s Massacre.’ It did more than any other single event to awaken a hitherto passive public to the ferocity of Prohibition-era gangland wars.


It also helped fix the gangster as a central figure in America’s cultural imagination, at a time when newspapers, pulp fiction and the infant sound cinema were all beginning to feed off the same brutal material.


Hollywood had, in fact, responded to the rise of organised crime almost in real time. The early 1930s produced a raw cycle of gangster films which were great showcases for legends like James Cagney, Edward G. Robinson, Paul Muni and Humphrey Bogart.


Classics like ‘Little Caesar’ (1931) with Robinson as an Al Capone-like gangster, ‘The Public Enemy’ (1931), and the Howard Hawks-directed original version of ‘Scarface’ (1932) – also based on Capone with Paul Muni in a seminal performance - had portrayed bootleggers as violent social climbers, volatile and crudely materialistic, reflecting an America unsettled by economic collapse and the sudden visibility of criminal wealth.


It was in the long interregnum between the raw vitality of the early 1930s gangster films and before the operatic and myth-making rehabilitation of the gangster in the 1970s that cult director Roger Corman released ‘The St. Valentine's Day Massacre’ in 1967.


Known by several memorable sobriquets, Corman, called the ‘The Pope of Pop Cinema’ was known for his shoestring shockers which he helmed with consummate skill and dynamism.


Notable among these were the now-classic, ultra-low-budget horror films of the early 1960s based on Edgar Allan Poe’s tales of macabre like ‘The Pit and the Pendulum,’ ‘The Masque of the Red Death’ and ‘The House of Usher’ - all starring the legendary Vincent Price. These baroque and lurid films established Corman as a director who could conjure atmosphere and ideas far in excess of his budgets.


Corman was given his biggest financial backing yet for ‘The St. Valentine’s Day Massacre,’ and he famously wanted Orson Welles for the part of Al Capone, with the great Jason Robards – one of America’s finest stage actors - cast as Capone’s deadly rival, George ‘Bugs’ Moran.


The studio shot down the proposition, instead miscasting Robards as Capone. The affable and highly talented George Segal, then at his peak, was also wasted as one of the Gusenberg brothers, Moran’s allies.


As a result, Robards hams it up as ‘old Scarface,’ utterly lacking the intimidating ferocity of Rod Steiger’s Al Capone before him, or Robert De Niro’s over-the-top flamboyance in Brian De Palma’s ‘The Untouchables’ (1987).


More than Robards or Segal, it is Ralph Meeker as Moran who does the better acting job. Oh yes, amid the wry commentary and bursts of intense Tommy-gun fire, there is also a walk-on part by a then-unknown Jack Nicholson.


Despite all its flaws, the film quite brilliantly captures Prohibition-era gangland Chicago. Its clipped, semi-documentary style, its refusal to romanticise its characters, and its emphasis on systems rather than psychology make it feel oddly modern. Corman treats organised crime less as melodrama than as a business model, complete with hierarchies, redundancies and ruthless efficiency.


It is Corman who is the real star of the picture, hammering home a distinctly pre-Godfather message about a naïve America in which the power structures of the executive suite and the corporation are eerily similar to those of a mob syndicate.


When people think of American organised crime on screen today, the monumental gangster epics that immediately spring to mind are Francis Ford Coppola’s ‘The Godfather’ trilogy (1972-90) with its operatic grandeur; Sergio Leone’s mournful, autumnal ‘Once Upon a Time in America’ (1984) or Brian De Palma’s flamboyantly excessive and over-the-top ‘Scarface’ remake (1983) and ‘The Untouchables.’ These films have come to define the mythology of American organised crime globally.


Buried somewhere beneath these monuments lies Corman’s ‘The St. Valentine’s Day Massacre.’ It lacks their grandeur and emotional pull, but in its bluntness and scepticism it reveals an earlier, harsher truth about the genre: that long before gangsters became tragic anti-heroes, they were simply men with guns, operating in a country only beginning to recognise what unchecked power really looked like.

Comments


bottom of page