top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 4:29:04 pm

Buried Lives

Pimpri-Chinchwad is fond of advertising itself as a model city. Its gleaming roads, industrial estates and ambitious infrastructure projects have helped make the Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) one of India’s wealthiest civic bodies. The shocking accident in which eight labourers died after a massive garbage heap collapsed onto the administrative building of the Waste-to-Energy plant at Moshi, exposes the rot beneath PCMC’s outwardly prosperous edifice. The contrast is...

Buried Lives

Pimpri-Chinchwad is fond of advertising itself as a model city. Its gleaming roads, industrial estates and ambitious infrastructure projects have helped make the Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) one of India’s wealthiest civic bodies. The shocking accident in which eight labourers died after a massive garbage heap collapsed onto the administrative building of the Waste-to-Energy plant at Moshi, exposes the rot beneath PCMC’s outwardly prosperous edifice. The contrast is impossible to ignore. A civic body flush with resources failed to prevent workers from being buried alive under its own waste. The facility should have been governed by the most basic principles of engineering and workplace safety. The Indian Army, the National Disaster Response Force, firefighters, police and municipal personnel have worked for days in dangerous conditions. Heavy excavators painstakingly removed unstable concrete while specialist teams searched for survivors. But their professionalism has only served to highlight the incompetence that had made their deployment necessary in the first place. Garbage dumps do not collapse without warning. Any administrative building situated in the shadow of such an unstable waste mass should have been subjected to rigorous risk assessment. If those assessments existed, they evidently failed. If they did not, the negligence is even graver. The tragedy also raises uncomfortable questions about the Waste-to-Energy project itself. It was inaugurated with much fanfare as a technological milestone, boasting India’s largest boiler of its kind. International engineering expertise and sophisticated machinery were proudly showcased. Yet impressive technology is meaningless if basic occupational safety is treated as an afterthought. Grand inaugurations make headlines. Routine maintenance rarely does. But it is the latter that determines whether workers return home alive. Municipal administrations have developed an unfortunate habit of measuring success in kilometres of roads laid, flyovers inaugurated and crores spent. The true measure of governance is far simpler. Can the poorest employee leave work safely at the end of the day? At Moshi, the answer is a devastating no. While compensation packages and promises of inquiries will inevitably follow and committees will submit reports, the danger is of responsibility becoming diluted across the chain of contractors, engineers and officials until accountability disappears into bureaucracy. That familiar script must not be allowed to play out again. PCMC cannot plead poverty nor cite a lack of technical expertise. It cannot claim that the dangers of unstable waste dumps were unknowable. A corporation with such financial strength possesses the means and the obligation to enforce the highest safety standards. The dead were casualties of preventable negligence. The wealth of a city is ultimately measured not by the size of its municipal budget, but by the value it places on the lives of those who keep it running. At Moshi, that value proved tragically cheap.

‘Haq ka pani’ – Reclaiming India's Rightful Share

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day assertion last year that "Haq ka pani" will serve Indian farmers marks a decisive shift in India's approach to the Indus Waters.


Far from being a departure, it is a long-overdue correction of historical restraint that has disproportionately disadvantaged India while enabling persistent misuse downstream. It signals that India will no longer allow its rightful share of water to go underutilised and wasted while its own farmers face scarcity.


When the Indus Waters Treaty was signed in 1960, India, as the upper riparian, made a remarkable concession by agreeing to restrict itself to about 20 per cent of the Indus system waters, allocating the overwhelming 80 per cent share to Pakistan. This decision reflected extraordinary goodwill.


The expectation was that such generosity would be matched by responsible conduct and a cooperative spirit. Instead, over the decades,  that spirit was never reciprocated.


Prime Minister Modi's statement must also be seen against the backdrop of repeated acts of cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan that have vitiated the trust.


The long-standing reality, captured in the phrase, "blood and water cannot flow together", is no longer rhetorical. Incidents such as the Pulwama terror attack, along with other attacks in the Valley, including the Pahalgam region, have underscored how sustained hostility undermines the very foundation on which cooperative arrangements like the Treaty rest.


No agreement, however well-crafted, can remain insulated from a complete breakdown of trust.


At a structural level, the Treaty itself contained asymmetries that became increasingly untenable. It imposed considerable restrictions on India's use of its allocated waters, yet places no corresponding obligation on Pakistan to justify its requirements or ensure efficient utilisation.


This is reflected in the widespread inefficiencies, losses in irrigation systems (estimated at about 47 MAF), inadequate storage and poor water management on their side leading to large volumes of Indus waters (upto 35 MAF) flowing to the Arabian Sea unutilized.


Meanwhile, India has borne the cost of restraint. Regions such as Rajasthan and Haryana have remained water-stressed, their agricultural potential constrained despite the availability of water that India is entitled to use.


This imbalance is precisely what the statement seeks to correct. "Haq ka pani" is, therefore, about rightful utilisation, not denial.


India is asserting that every drop of the Indus system will now be used productively for irrigation, hydropower and development.


Indian projects on the Western rivers, including Baglihar and Salal, highlight another dimension of the challenge. Over time, sedimentation has reduced their efficiency and storage capacity.


Flushing operations, essential for maintaining dam safety and performance, were delayed for years due to unfounded objections and procedural hurdles created by Pakistan.


The eventual need to remove accumulated sediment only reinforced the cost of such delays. Going forward, India's approach will prioritise timely, state-of-the-art technical interventions, without being held hostage by malign and hyperbolic political theatrics disguised as technical differences.


The broader message is clear. First, India will fully utilise its rightful share of water in water-stressed regions. Second, it will no longer accept a framework where inefficiency and waste go unchecked on one side while artificial and unscientific constraints are sought to be imposed on the other.


Third, it will assert its technical autonomy, ensuring that infrastructure creation and maintenance proceed apace, in line with current scientific thinking and international best practices.


This is not a repudiation of any customary principles; it is a response to the destruction of the foundational pillars of the Treaty. When the very promises that undergird a treaty are breached by hostility, terror, misinformation, and misuse, recalibration becomes inevitable.


For decades, India exercised patience, even at tangible cost to its own development. That era is giving way to one of clarity and balance. "Haq ka pani" is an overdue commitment that India's water will serve its people, its farmers, and its future.


While some vested interests may try to mischaracterise it as a threat, it is nothing but a necessary course correction in a changing context.


(The writer is Former Chairman of Central Water Commission.)

bottom of page