top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Raj Thackeray tormented over ‘missing kids’ in state

Mumbai : Expressing grave concerns over the steep rise in cases of ‘missing children’ in the state, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) President Raj Thackeray has accused the state government of treating the matter casually and failing to respond to it urgently.   In an open missive on 'X' to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, Raj Thackeray quoted data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) pointing at almost an alarming 30 pc increase in the number of children ‘missing’ in the state...

Raj Thackeray tormented over ‘missing kids’ in state

Mumbai : Expressing grave concerns over the steep rise in cases of ‘missing children’ in the state, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) President Raj Thackeray has accused the state government of treating the matter casually and failing to respond to it urgently.   In an open missive on 'X' to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, Raj Thackeray quoted data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) pointing at almost an alarming 30 pc increase in the number of children ‘missing’ in the state between 2021-2024.   When asked for his reactions, Fadnavis told media-persons in Nagpur that he had not read the letter, but the issue raised is important and he would reply to it. Fadnavis stated that the NCRB has also provided the reasons why the kids go ‘missing’, how they return and the period, ranging from 3 days to 18 months.   Dwelling on the sufficiency of the NCRB figures, he contended that they reflect only complaints formally registered by the police and thousands of cases may never be reported.   On the ‘rescue, return and reunion’ of such missing children, he pointed to the sheer psychological trauma they may have suffered and sought to know how such child-lifter networks continued to thrive openly and blatantly.   The MNS chief targeted what he claimed was the “state’s lack of proactive measures to identify and dismantle child-begging rackets” as many juveniles can be seen begging at railway stations, bus stands, traffic signals, often accompanied by adults with doubtful authenticity.   “If some woman claims to be the child’s relative or guardian, should the government not order a thorough probe? Is it inappropriate to consider even a DNA test in suspicious cases,” Raj Thackeray demanded.   Slamming the government and the Opposition, he lamented how both sides failed to prioritise such urgent social issues in the legislature where discussions centre around partisan sparring.   The letter also mentions attempts by the Centre to coordinate with states on the ‘missing or trafficked children’, regretting how political upmanships and symbolic debates prevent meaningful action on the ground.   The NCRB said that Maharashtra has consistently ranked among states with the highest number of ‘missing children’, particularly in urban centres like Mumbai, Thane, and Pune.   Simultaneously, experts, child rights NGOs and activists have warned about trafficking networks that exploit poverty, migration and weak law enforcement and low convictions, despite official rescue missions or rehab efforts.   In his appeal, Raj Thackeray called upon Fadnavis to take concrete, visible measures rather than discussions and conventions. “Maharashtra expects decisive steps from you, not speeches. Jai Maharashtra,” he signed off.     In October 2023,Sharad Pawar red-flagged ‘missing girls-women’ This is the second major social cause by a political leader, two years after Nationalist Congress Party (SP) President Sharad Pawar had red-flagged nearly 20,000 ‘missing women and girls’ from the state between Jan-May 2023.   In the present instance, Raj Thackeray said that “behind the statistics lies a far more disturbing reality involving organised, inter-state gangs that kidnap children, physically abuse them and force them into begging rings”.   “Little kids are assaulted, made to beg and shifted across states. Groups of children disappear suddenly, and the government appears unable, or unwilling, to grasp the seriousness of what is happening,” said Thackeray in a strong tone.

Hardline Architect of America’s China Policy

Updated: Jan 27

America’s China Policy

Marco Rubio’s swearing-in as Secretary of State has marked a decisive shift in U.S. foreign policy. An unapologetically hardline figure in American diplomacy in regard to China, Rubio, a former Florida senator, promptly convened a key meeting with the foreign ministers of Australia, India, and Japan—the Indo-Pacific Quad—reaffirming their commitment to regional stability and cooperation. The timing and significance of the meeting was clear: with Rubio at the helm of the State Department, combating China’s growing influence will remain high on the agenda.


In contrast to his predecessors, who often sought diplomatic engagement or détente with Beijing, Rubio has shown little patience for such approaches. His remarks at his confirmation hearing, dubbing China “the most potent, dangerous, and near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted,” only served to cement his uncompromising stance on the ‘Red Dragon.’ His past as a ‘China hawk’ in the Senate has made him a prominent critic of Beijing’s human rights abuses and territorial ambitions, and it has earned him sanctions from the Chinese government—an indication of how seriously he is taken in Beijing.


For India, his appointment comes as a strategic boon. Rubio’s unwavering stance on China aligns closely with India’s strategic interests. As China continues to challenge India militarily and assert territorial claims in the South China Sea, Rubio’s hardline approach provides India with a robust diplomatic ally.


The Quad itself has evolved significantly over the years. What started as a humanitarian coalition in the aftermath of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami now serves as a critical counterbalance to China’s expansion in the region. Rubio’s early and enthusiastic support for the Quad reaffirms his commitment to strengthening India’s position in a region increasingly dominated by Beijing.


In contrast to previous Secretaries of State, such as Rex Tillerson or Mike Pompeo, Rubio brings an entirely different set of priorities. Tillerson, with his business background, often emphasized engagement and stability in U.S.-China relations, a course that aligned with the broader goals of President Obama’s ‘Pivot to Asia’ strategy. Pompeo, while critical of China, was also inclined toward maintaining traditional diplomatic engagement with other global powers. Rubio, however, operates in a much more polarized geopolitical landscape. His tenure will likely be marked by more direct confrontations with Beijing - on trade, military aggression, and human rights - creating a clear distinction from his predecessors.


In his first speech as Secretary of State, Rubio made it clear that U.S. foreign policy would be guided by the imperative of national interest. This blunt focus on America’s self-interest might be seen as a departure from more multilateral, diplomatic efforts that characterized the post-Cold War period. But for India, this could mean greater support and security assurances in the face of Chinese aggression. Rubio’s commitment to regional allies, especially India, is a promise to bolster democratic institutions in Asia, while ensuring that Beijing is kept at bay.


Under the Trump administration, the Quad has evolved into a more robust partnership, aimed not just at countering China but also at fostering a long-term economic and security framework. Rubio’s leadership ensures that the U.S. will continue to be an active player in the Quad, pushing for initiatives that challenge China’s economic and territorial dominance.


Yet, while his hardline stance on China is clearly beneficial for India’s interests, Rubio faces challenges at home. His appointment comes amid a period of significant restructuring at the State Department, with many career diplomats being forced to resign to make room for Trump’s appointees. While Rubio has praised the work of the department, the political and bureaucratic upheaval is likely to colour his diplomatic approach in ways that could affect not just relations with China, but with traditional U.S. allies.


In the coming months, Rubio’s leadership will redefine the U.S.’s role on the world stage. For India, it is a chance to fortify its position as a key player in the Indo-Pacific. Rubio’s combative stance on China offers both a strategic opportunity and a diplomatic alignment that India has long sought. In this new era of American diplomacy, Rubio’s unwavering commitment to confronting China could prove to be the linchpin in reshaping global alliances, with India set to emerge as one of the primary beneficiaries of his leadership.

Comments


bottom of page