HC panel flags construction waste, poor dust controls
- Bhalchandra Chorghade

- Apr 27
- 3 min read

Mumbai: In an important development, a two‑judge monitoring committee appointed by the Bombay High Court has flagged serious and persistent failures in Navi Mumbai’s air‑pollution control measures after an on‑site inspection on Monday, April 27. The panel, comprising Justice Anuja Prabhudesai and Justice Amjad Sayed, was constituted in February 2026 to supervise local authorities’ response to rising pollution levels after the court found prior efforts unsatisfactory.
As of Monday, Navi Mumbai’s city‑average Air Quality Index (AQI) was in the Moderate range, averaging around 88 AQI. The committee noted, however, that several localities routinely record worse readings such as Panvel registered approximately 110 AQI and Ghansoli about 104 AQI on recent monitoring -- levels that move parts of the city into the Poor or Unhealthy‑for‑Sensitive‑Groups categories. Early 2026 data continue to show repeated high‑pollution days in multiple pockets.
The panel highlighted that Navi Mumbai’s air quality has not improved over the past three years. A 2019–2023 analysis cited to the committee found the city among those with the largest increases in PM 2.5, reporting about a 46 per cent rise in fine particulate matter over that five‑year period. The committee warned that without urgent and coordinated action, the trend could persist or worsen.
Site Visit
During its inspection, which included JNPA Road and other stretches, the committee observed construction material and debris strewn along roadsides, uncovered piles of building material and uneven, unlevelled road surfaces contributing to dust generation. The judges recorded that mitigation measures were not being properly implemented, dust monitoring lacked adequate coverage and enforcement besides traffic management to reduce dust resuspension was deficient.
According to sources, the committee after a field visit, held a meeting at the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) with representatives from the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority (JNPA), Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA), Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC), the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB), NMMC and other agencies. The panel criticised the absence of a coordinated approach and noted that while NMMC operates a construction‑waste disposal facility, the integration of private municipal contractors and other municipal agencies such as Panvel Municipal Corporation into a unified disposal and enforcement framework was inadequate, undermining systematic waste handling.
Committee’s Directions
The monitoring judges directed the authorities to identify and segregate debris at inspected sites, ensure all construction material is covered and secured to prevent fugitive dust and implement immediate traffic management measures to curb dust re‑suspension and vehicle emissions. The committee called for the formation of a joint inter‑agency committee to coordinate enforcement, continuous dust monitoring (specifying locations, instruments and frequency) and a consolidated action plan with timelines and designated responsible officers. The court‑appointed panel warned that it will require regular progress reports and may impose further directions if responses are inadequate.
Health Risks
The committee and officials present attributed elevated particulate levels to a combination of industrial emissions, intense construction activity, uncontained debris and waste burning apart from and road dust stirred by vehicular movement. Given the documented 46 per cent increase in PM2.5 between 2019 and 2023 and recurring high‑pollution days into 2026, the judges emphasised the public‑health implications, particularly for children, the elderly and persons with respiratory or cardiovascular conditions.
The court’s active supervisory role signals an expectation of verifiable, time‑bound action rather than piecemeal or cosmetic fixes. The joint committee and participating agencies have been asked to submit a consolidated, publicly reportable plan detailing dust‑suppression procedures, construction‑waste handling and disposal protocols, traffic‑management measures and implementation timelines. The High Court committee will monitor compliance and may require additional remedial measures if progress is insufficient.





Comments