top of page

By:

Rajendra Pandharpure

15 April 2025 at 2:25:54 pm

BJP eyes chances in Western Maharashtra after the Pawars

The death of Ajit Pawar has unsettled western Maharashtra, leaving the BJP cautiously biding its time Pune: Western Maharashtra has long been Indian politics in miniature: dense with sugar cooperatives, caste arithmetic, money and muscle power. For decades it was shaped by one extended family – the Pawars - whose writ ran from district banks to dairy unions and from assembly halls to village panchayats. The sudden death of Ajit Pawar, the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) strongman and...

BJP eyes chances in Western Maharashtra after the Pawars

The death of Ajit Pawar has unsettled western Maharashtra, leaving the BJP cautiously biding its time Pune: Western Maharashtra has long been Indian politics in miniature: dense with sugar cooperatives, caste arithmetic, money and muscle power. For decades it was shaped by one extended family – the Pawars - whose writ ran from district banks to dairy unions and from assembly halls to village panchayats. The sudden death of Ajit Pawar, the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) strongman and Maharashtra’s deputy chief minister, has jolted this ecosystem. The aftershocks are being felt most keenly not by his rivals, but by his ally, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that has long coveted the region. Maharashtra’s politics has always been regionally segmented. The BJP is entrenched in north Maharashtra; it has broken through spectacularly in Mumbai, including wresting control of the municipal corporation; Vidarbha remains Congress-leaning while Marathwada is competitive and volatile. Family Bastion Western Maharashtra, by contrast, has remained been the Pawars’ citadel. Control over cooperatives, especially sugar, has translated into rural loyalty, financial muscle and electoral dominance. The NCP, founded by Sharad Pawar, thrived on this architecture. The BJP, despite its national rise, has struggled to crack it. Rather than dislodge the system, the BJP sought to co-opt it. Disaffected satraps were inducted like Udayanraje Bhosale in Satara; the Mahadiks in Kolhapur; the Mohite-Patils in Solapur. Local strongmen such as Rahul Kul in Pune district were elevated and veterans like Harshvardhan Patil were brought in, if only briefly. The idea was to gradually bleed the undivided NCP led by patriarch Sharad Pawar. That effort has intensified as the BJP eyes an audacious goal: returning to power in Maharashtra on its own in the 2029 Assembly election. For that to happen, western Maharashtra is indispensable. It is no accident that the Modi government had created a new Union ministry of cooperation, handing it to Amit Shah. Cooperatives are the region’s political bloodstream. After the 2024 general election, Muralidhar Mohol, elected from Pune, was made minister of state in the same department. He was also informally tasked with western Maharashtra in a clear signal of the BJP’s strategic focus. Mohol’s brief was daunting: contain both Pawars. Sharad Pawar’s stature as a national deal-maker and Ajit Pawar’s grip on local machinery made them a formidable duo even when divided. Yet, the recent municipal contests in Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad hinted at change. When both Pawars campaigned together, the BJP still managed to defeat them, suggesting that the old formula no longer guaranteed victory. Uncertain Times Then came the plane crash on January 28 leading to Ajit Pawar’s tragic death. His wife, Sunetra Pawar, was sworn in as deputy chief minister, an act of continuity intended to steady the ranks. While public sympathy is palpable, it has nothing to do with organisation. Sunetra Pawar will need time to command the networks her husband once ran by instinct. Her early gestures like visiting Karad to pay homage to Yashwantrao Chavan and invoking the legacy of Phule, Shahu and Ambedkar signal an attempt to anchor the party in its progressive tradition. Whether that rhetoric can substitute for Ajit Pawar’s authority is uncertain. Uncertainty abounds elsewhere too. Rumours swirl of a rapprochement or even a merger between the rival NCP factions. One scenario has Supriya Sule entering the Union cabinet. Another asks a more existential question: could Sharad Pawar, architect of Maharashtra’s secular, centrist politics, ever align formally with the BJP’s Hindutva project? His reported unease with a recent India–America trade agreement has fuelled speculation among supporters already anxious about ideological drift. Against this haze, the BJP’s restraint is striking. Rather than rushing to exploit the moment, it has preferred to wait and watch. The party knows that western Maharashtra is not won in a season. Cooperative elections, local bodies and caste coalitions move slowly. For now, the BJP is content to let the Pawars recalibrate, to allow factions to test their strength, and to intervene only when the contours are clearer. In a region where politics has long been about inheritance, Ajit Pawar’s absence has exposed how fragile even the most entrenched systems can be. The BJP senses opportunity, but is also aware of the attendant risks. Its wait-and-watch posture reflects a calculation born of experience. And in western Maharashtra, patience can be a weapon.

Hijacked Voices, Broken Brands

There’s something deeply unsettling about having someone else speak on your behalf—especially when you didn’t ask for it.


We’ve all witnessed this. You’re in a room, capable of articulating your thoughts, yet someone decides they know you better than you know yourself. They start explaining your actions, justifying your choices, or answering questions meant for you. And while their intent may not always be malicious, the impact is far from helpful. In fact, it’s quietly damaging—not just for the one being spoken for, but also for the person doing the speaking.


Personal branding isn’t only about the image you project. It’s also about the space you hold for others. When you repeatedly override someone’s voice, it tells the world two things: one, that you don’t trust the other person’s ability to represent themselves, and two, that you may be seeking control, attention, or validation at the cost of someone else’s autonomy. That’s not leadership. That’s ego, poorly disguised.


It’s especially dangerous in professional settings. Imagine a manager speaking for a team member in front of senior leadership, interpreting their feelings, explaining their work ethic, or brushing aside their discomfort as if it’s irrelevant. What message does that send? It tells the room that the individual in question lacks agency. It also tells the room that the manager prefers domination over delegation, performance over empathy. And both impressions reflect poorly on the speaker’s brand.


On the other side of this scenario is the person being spoken for. They begin to shrink. Not because they lack confidence, but because they weren’t given a chance to show it. Over time, this leads to frustration, self-doubt, and disconnection. They begin to feel invisible, even when they’re right there. And here’s the kicker—others in the room notice too. They notice the person being overshadowed, and they notice the one doing the overshadowing. Neither walks away with their personal brand intact.


In high-stakes environments—boardrooms, negotiations, media interviews—every word you speak carries weight. And so does every word you shouldn’t have spoken. The art of building a strong personal brand lies not just in what you say, but also in what you choose not to say. Knowing when to stay silent, when to let others take the stage, and when to pass the mic is what separates powerful leaders from insecure performers.


HNIs, business owners, founders, and CXOs—this applies to you more than anyone. The way you treat people who are “below you” on the org chart speaks volumes to those who are “above you” in influence. Investors, clients, and future collaborators don’t just assess your business acumen—they assess your emotional intelligence. They look at how you listen. They look at how you delegate. They look at how you let others shine. Because that’s what sustainable leadership looks like.


Speaking on behalf of someone else without consent isn’t just a social misstep—it’s a branding blunder. It reveals insecurity masked as authority, control masked as support, and ego masked as expertise. The world today is too connected and too aware for such behavior to go unnoticed.


Instead, let your brand reflect restraint, respect, and radical trust. Build a reputation where people admire not just your success but the way you elevate others. That’s the kind of brand that attracts meaningful relationships, premium opportunities, and long-term loyalty.


If this made you think—even a little—about how you’re showing up in conversations and how your words are shaping your image, maybe it’s time for a reality check. Maybe it’s time to invest in your brand—not just as a business leader, but as a human being.


And when you're ready to discover how powerful your brand can truly be, you know where to find me.

LinkedIn: Divyaa Advaani

Instagram: @suaveu6 (Divyaa Advaani)

YouTube: @suaveu (Suave U – Divyaa Advaani)


(The author is a personal branding expert. She has clients from 14+ countries. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page