top of page

By:

Bhaskar Nath Biswal

13 May 2026 at 3:00:30 pm

Restoring Ethics in Higher Education

AI generated image In the cultural fabric of India, the educator has historically occupied a space higher than the temporal world, encapsulated in the sacred maxim ‘Acharya Devo Bhava’, the teacher is akin to the divine. This guru-shishya parampara was not merely an instructional methodology but a spiritual covenant where knowledge was transmitted alongside a rigorous code of moral rectitude. Today, that revered pedestal is fracturing. The deeply unsettling revelations surrounding the...

Restoring Ethics in Higher Education

AI generated image In the cultural fabric of India, the educator has historically occupied a space higher than the temporal world, encapsulated in the sacred maxim ‘Acharya Devo Bhava’, the teacher is akin to the divine. This guru-shishya parampara was not merely an instructional methodology but a spiritual covenant where knowledge was transmitted alongside a rigorous code of moral rectitude. Today, that revered pedestal is fracturing. The deeply unsettling revelations surrounding the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) leaks, involving the alleged complicity of university chemistry and botany professors, have laid bare a deeper systemic malaise. This is not an isolated incident of administrative lapse; it represents a profound crisis of academic ethics, signalling that the very custodians of the nation's intellectual and moral future are compromising the integrity of the system they were sworn to protect. Fragile Credibility As more cases of unethical behaviour within the teaching community emerge, ranging from plagiarized research and predatory journal publications to cash-for-marks scams, the credibility of the entire academic ecosystem hangs in the balance. The transformation of education from a noble mission into a transactional marketplace has eroded public trust. When professors, who are supposed to mentor the next generation of doctors, scientists and thinkers, engage in paper leaks and institutional fraud, they do not just cheat a system; they actively jeopardize public safety and institutional merit. The psychological toll on millions of honest, hardworking students who find their futures hijacked by the greed of a few privileged insiders is immeasurable. Historically, the government has recognized that the progress of the nation relies heavily on the quality and dignity of its teaching community. Significant fiscal measures, periodic pay commission hikes and enhanced service conditions have been implemented over the decades to attract and retain premier talent in academia. The underlying philosophy has been simple: by securing the financial and social well-being of educators, society ensures their autonomy and insulates them from corrupting influences. Furthermore, the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 was envisioned as a watershed moment to explicitly address these foundational cracks. The policy outlines a comprehensive framework for restructuring teacher education, establishing merit-based tenure tracks and fostering a culture of continuous professional development steeped in ethical practice. NEP 2020 explicitly aims to restore the status of teachers as the most respected members of society, linking accountability directly with institutional autonomy. Massive Disconnect In tandem with legislative policy, the University Grants Commission (UGC) has consistently formulated regulations to preserve academic hygiene. From setting up stringent Consortium for Academic and Research Ethics (CARE) reference lists to filter out fraudulent journals, to mandating anti-plagiarism software and institutional ethical committees, the regulatory framework exists. The UGC has repeatedly warned universities against malpractices and instituted strict punitive measures for academic dishonesty. Yet, despite these top-heavy policy interventions and regulatory mechanisms, a massive disconnect persists when these ideals translate to the ground level. The practical reality in Indian higher education institutions reveals a battlefield of perverse incentives. At the ground level, professors are often trapped in a hyper-competitive ‘publish or perish’ culture where quantitative metrics override qualitative excellence. Academic promotions and institutional funding are tied to bureaucratic checklists, forcing many to take ethical shortcuts. Furthermore, the massive commercialization of coaching industries and the hyper-inflation of grades have created immense external pressure, turning examinations into high-stakes battlefields where the temptation for financial kickbacks becomes overwhelming. Academic administrators are frequently selected based on political patronage rather than scholarly integrity. Restoring the tarnished image of the academic community requires a fundamental systemic recalibration. Ethical training must be integrated as a core, non-negotiable component of teacher training and doctoral coursework, rather than treated as a peripheral bureaucratic formality. Institutional audits must become transparent, shifting the focus from mere box-ticking to holistic evaluations of an educator's contribution to learning and mentorship. The teaching community itself must foster a culture of collective internal accountability, where peer pressure actively discourages ethical compromises instead of protecting errant colleagues. The crisis triggered by the NEET leaks is a final wake-up call for a nation that prides itself on its civilizational intellectual heritage. Reclaiming the sanctity of the ‘Acharya’ is not merely an exercise in nostalgic romanticism; it is an urgent structural necessity for the survival of India's democratic and developmental aspirations. Only when ethics are restored to the heart of pedagogy can the country rebuild the sacred trust between the teacher and the taught. (The writer is a former college Principal and Founder of Supporting Shoulders. Views personal.)

Imran Khan’s Fall from Grace

Updated: Oct 21, 2024

Imran Khan’s Fall from Grace

Imran Khan, once hailed as Pakistan’s most charismatic and resilient leader now finds himself in a position unprecedented for a man of his stature.

The former Prime Minister of Pakistan, once known for his unyielding spirit and fierce determination, now shows signs of strain. Imprisoned and facing numerous charges, Khan appears to be a shadow of the leader who once inspired millions.

Khan’s recent meeting with journalists revealed a man who is a shell of his former self. Once confident and commanding, his body now shows a sense of unease and agitation. Those who met him describe a waning spirit, a stark change for a leader once known for his steadfastness in adversity.

The journalists described Khan as a man who is aware that his political party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), is losing its once-iron grip on the nation’s imagination―a realisation that visibly shook him.

The PTI, once a magnet for massive crowds and inspired loyalty among its supporters, is now struggling. The much-hyped rally scheduled for August 22 in Islamabad, was embarrassingly cancelled due to a lack of public interest. Khan, in a bid to save face, claimed that the rally was called off to avoid potential violence. In a sign of growing desperation, Khan rescheduled the rally for September 8 and directed his party leaders to overcome any obstacles. This defiant stance is typical of Khan’s confrontational style, and his public directives highlight his insecurity about his party’s ability to mobilise support.

While Khan outwardly appears calm and composed, the multiple cases against him and his time in jail have left him isolated and struggling with loneliness. Even in this difficult situation, he remains in the headlines, thanks to his uncanny ability to stay in the public’s eye. Khan recently made headlines by applying for the University of Oxford Chancellorship, a move initially dismissed as a rumor but confirmed by his spokesman, Sayed Zulfikar Bukhari. As an Oxford alumnus, Khan would be the first Asian to take the role. Many see this bid as a strategic play to leverage his international profile against Pakistan’s establishment, a move that has kept him prominently in the media spotlight.

The political landscape in Pakistan is deeply divided. Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, in his second term, has failed to address critical issues including unemployment, soaring inflation, and deteriorating law and order. His administration’s inability to deliver on its promises has only deepened the public’s disillusionment, leading to growing nostalgia for Khan’s past leadership.

Shahbaz Sharif’s government is a source of frustration for the Pakistani people and a cause for concern for the country’s military. Historically, the military has shaped Pakistan’s political trajectory, stepping in when civilian governments falter. The military reportedly is growing uneasy about the government’s performance especially Sharif’s inability to stabilize the country and mend relationships with key neighbors, particularly India. Additionally, its deteriorating ties with Afghanistan and Iran have left Pakistan increasingly isolated. Even China, Pakistan’s longstanding ally, has expressed dissatisfaction with the government’s policies, a worrying sign given the importance of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) to the country’s economic future.

It is within this context of political turmoil and international isolation that Imran Khan remains a potent force. Despite his legal troubles and the challenges facing his party, Khan’s popularity endures. For millions of Pakistanis, his tenure as Prime Minister is seen as a time of relative stability and hope, a stark contrast to the current administration’s ineptitude. This perception has kept Khan’s political base intact, even as his party faces an uphill battle in the coming months.

However, Khan’s ability to navigate the current political landscape is far from guaranteed. The PTI’s diminishing support, coupled with the increasing pressure from the establishment, raises questions about Khan’s long-term strategy. His recent moves, including the application for the Oxford Chancellorship, suggest a leader willing to explore unconventional avenues to maintain his relevance. But whether these tactics will translate into a successful political comeback remains to be seen.

Pakistan’s political future is more uncertain than ever. Imran Khan’s journey from cricketing legend to political maverick has been extraordinary. Still, as he faces the toughest challenge of his career, the question remains: Can he once again defy the odds and reclaim his place at the helm of Pakistani politics, or is this the beginning of the end for a once unstoppable leader?

Khan’s story is a testament to the complexities of power and the unpredictable nature of political life in Pakistan. His rise, driven by charisma, populism, and a genuine desire for change, now faces the realities of personal and political challenges, raising the possibility that his time may be running out.

Imran Khan is a beacon of hope for his supporters, and a polarizing figure for detractors, whose ambitions have often clouded his judgment. As the nation watches, the world is left to wonder: What will Imran Khan’s next move be? And more importantly, what does it mean for the future of Pakistan? The coming months will be critical not only for Imran Khan but for Pakistan as a whole. The decisions made during this period will shape the country’s trajectory for years. Whether Khan emerges victorious or is consigned to the annals of history as a fallen leader, one thing is certain: The story of Imran Khan is far from over.

(The writer is a senior jounalist based in Islamabad. Views personal)

Comments


bottom of page