top of page

By:

Bhaskar Nath Biswal

13 May 2026 at 3:00:30 pm

The New PG Playbook

Last month, the University Grants Commission (UGC) issued a landmark circular that promises to transform the postgraduate education landscape in India. By allowing Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) already approved for two-year Open and Distance Learning (ODL) and Online postgraduate (PG) programmes to offer a one-year version in the same discipline, the UGC operationalized a major vision outlined in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. For students holding a four-year bachelor’s...

The New PG Playbook

Last month, the University Grants Commission (UGC) issued a landmark circular that promises to transform the postgraduate education landscape in India. By allowing Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) already approved for two-year Open and Distance Learning (ODL) and Online postgraduate (PG) programmes to offer a one-year version in the same discipline, the UGC operationalized a major vision outlined in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. For students holding a four-year bachelor’s degree with Honours, this creates a direct, accelerated one-year route to a master’s degree via online or distance modes. While framed around flexibility and student choice, this reform prompts a deeper question: how should 21st-century India balance depth, speed and access in higher education? Structural Safeguards This shift originates in NEP 2020’s framework of flexible entry and exit points, seamless credit mobility and international academic alignment. The policy established that a four-year undergraduate degree with research or Honours should be considered equivalent to the traditional three-year degree plus additional coursework for pursuing advanced studies. The UGC’s directive gives structural backing to this equivalence within the ODL and online sectors. Crucially, this is not an open permission. Institutions may only offer the one-year postgraduate option if they already maintain an approved two-year programme in that subject. Furthermore, the curriculum, credit system, assessment rigor and instructional material must strictly adhere to UGC guidelines and institutional approvals. Admission remains restricted to four-year Honours graduates, while professional degrees like the MBA or MCA must continue meeting their respective regulatory criteria. Thus, the framework acts as a targeted parallel track rather than a dilution of academic standards. The advantages of this policy shift are considerable, particularly in a developing economy where time and financial constraints often determine educational outcomes. First, reducing postgraduate duration directly lowers tuition costs and living expenses. For a working professional or student balancing household budgets, entering the job market or qualifying for doctoral research a year earlier makes a meaningful impact on career trajectories. Second, it brings Indian qualifications closer to global norms. One-year master’s degrees are standard across Europe, the United States, Australia and parts of Asia, and this change eliminates credit transfer hurdles for Indian graduates seeking global academic or employment opportunities. Third, it harnesses online and distance learning formats to expand opportunities across underserved regions where physical postgraduate seats are scarce and migration costs are prohibitive. Finally, it provides a tangible reward for students who opted for four-year multidisciplinary undergraduate degrees, reinforcing the incentive to pursue specialized academic depth early on. Operational Risks However, translating policy into practice introduces operational challenges. The primary concern revolves around quality assurance. Compressing a postgraduate curriculum into a single year, even with equivalent credit requirements demands intensive academic focus from both educators and learners. In distance and online learning, where independent study dominates, there is a distinct danger of turning advanced degrees into mere module-checking exercises. To prevent this, institutions must invest in rich digital resources, active mentorship and secure evaluation systems. A second obstacle involves public perception and institutional acceptance. Traditional employers, particularly within state agencies and conservative industries, long equate a two-year master's with comprehensive capability. Academic circles may similarly question whether a twelve-month framework provides sufficient time for specialized research and practical skill acquisition. While the UGC circular limits entry to four-year Honours graduates, communicating this distinction to recruiters and international universities requires active, transparent outreach to ensure the degree is viewed as accelerated rather than shortened. Finally, professional degrees governed by specialized bodies like the AICTE must carefully align internship and accreditation requirements so that graduates face no disadvantage during recruitment drives. Addressing these challenges requires building a supportive institutional ecosystem around the new model. Universities should publish detailed credit frameworks demonstrating how the accelerated curriculum corresponds to two-year standards, incorporating capstone projects or research modules to maintain analytical depth. Quality assurance bodies like NAAC and the UGC should make evaluation criteria for online programmes transparent, helping candidates make informed decisions. Simultaneously, recruitment regulations across public and private sectors must explicitly recognize a one-year postgraduate degree following a four-year undergraduate degree as fully equivalent to traditional qualifications. The UGC’s circular represents a vital step toward modernizing Indian postgraduate education. Executed with institutional discipline and rigorous oversight, it offers a powerful mechanism for social mobility, financial relief, and global integration. On the other hand, its superficial implementation may reduce high-level education to paper credentials. (The writer is a former college Principal and Founder of Supporting Shoulders, an Odisha-based non-profit Trust. Views personal.)

India Cannot Run on ‘Indian Time’

From late meetings to delayed projects, India’s casual attitude to punctuality carries an invisible national cost.

AI generated image
AI generated image

My earlier article on the W2K problem argued that our working weeks are limited and should not be wasted casually. This article takes that idea further and looks at a larger social habit: the culture of not valuing time seriously.


Timekeeping began with shadows, stars, sundials and water clocks. Today, however, a second is defined with extraordinary precision as exactly 9,192,631,770 vibrations of cesium-133 atoms. Atomic clocks support GPS, banking, mobile networks, aviation, scientific research, and digital communication. Humanity can now measure time with astonishing accuracy, yet many societies, including ours, continue to treat appointments and schedules casually.


Most people look at a clock to know the time, but a wiser person looks at a clock to understand how an organized society works. Modern life depends on millions of people following shared timings. A country runs not just on high infrastructure and cutting-edge technology, but on people honouring schedules and commitments.


Importance of Time

Human societies understood the importance of time long before wristwatches and smartphones appeared. Ancient cultures carefully tracked seasons, stars and planetary movements. India, too, had developed highly advanced systems of astronomy and calendars. The observatories of Jantar Mantar show how seriously time and astronomy were once studied in our country.


Ancient Indian texts like the ‘Surya Siddhanta’ described remarkably sophisticated systems of time measurement, ranging from large cosmic cycles down to tiny fractions of time. Indian thought treated time not simply as a practical necessity, but as a powerful cosmic principle. In the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna famously declares, “I am Time.” Ancient Indian traditions also attached great importance to the timing of rituals, agriculture, astronomy, and daily life.


A civilization that once organized prayers, temple rituals, agriculture, and astronomy around carefully observed timings now treats delay with surprising casualness.


Mechanical clocks transformed the world. The Industrial Revolution succeeded not only because of machines, but because people learned to work according to disciplined schedules. Even today, economies depend on coordinated functioning between millions of people and institutions. The real challenge today is creating a social culture that values punctuality.


This is where we often fail. We have normalized a phrase called “Indian Time,” which usually means that announced timings are not expected to be followed seriously. A program scheduled for 10 a.m. may begin much later because the chief guest is “on the way,” organizers are “waiting for a few more people,” or preparations are still incomplete. The audience waits patiently because everyone expects a delay, and slowly, delay becomes accepted social behaviour.


This habit affects everyday life in countless invisible ways. Weddings begin late because guests expect delays. Public functions start behind schedule because organizers assume people will not arrive on time. Important meetings are postponed because some participants are “just reaching.” Television debates begin late, conferences run behind schedule, and official events stretch endlessly. Over time, people stop feeling guilty about wasting the time of others. Delays become normal, and punctuality begins to look unusual.


But delay is never harmless. If twenty people wait fifteen minutes for a delayed meeting, five human hours are lost. When this happens repeatedly across offices, hospitals, courts, conferences and public institutions, the national loss becomes enormous. Government data show that delays in large infrastructure projects have led to cost overruns running into several lakh crore rupees. Delay is therefore not a small inconvenience. It is an invisible economic burden created by poor time discipline.


Long-term Consequences

The consequences go far beyond economics. As delays become routine, people stop trusting schedules. Institutions lose credibility, and daily life becomes filled with unnecessary buffers and uncertainty. Gradually, lower expectations become acceptable. People begin leaving early for simple appointments because they no longer trust traffic, systems or announced timings. In the long run, society starts spending more energy managing uncertainty than improving efficiency.


Science itself teaches us the importance of time. Albert Einstein showed that time is deeply connected with motion, gravity and space. Yet despite such scientific understanding, everyday behaviour often remains careless about punctuality. Relativity may explain the universe, but it cannot justify arriving thirty minutes late for a meeting.


India presents an interesting contradiction. We produce world-class software, and scientific talent for highly time-sensitive global systems, yet in everyday public life, we often tolerate delays very easily. We dream in nanoseconds while functioning in “roughly half an hour.”


Countries known for efficiency did not become efficient accidentally. Japan’s railway system is admired not only because of technology, but because punctuality is treated seriously. Switzerland is respected worldwide because keeping time is considered part of basic civic behaviour and consideration for others.


This issue goes far beyond punctuality. Valuing time is ultimately about valuing fellow human beings. When patients wait endlessly in hospitals, when public programmes begin late, when files move slowly through offices, and when conferences continue without purpose, people receive a silent message that their time is not very valuable.


Technology alone cannot solve this problem. The deeper issue lies in habits that society has slowly stopped questioning.


There is a pressing for the negative phrase ‘Indian Time’ to disappear from our vocabulary because it turns indiscipline into identity. India does not need a cultural excuse for delay. A country aspiring to lead in science, manufacturing, technology and innovation cannot function on elastic schedules.


As Benjamin Franklin wisely observed, “Lost time is never found again.” Time is not merely passing around us. We are passing through it. Every great civilization learned how to measure time. The successful ones also learned how to value it.


(The writer is an ANRF Prime Minister Professor at COEP Technological University, Pune, and former Director of the Agharkar Research Institute, Pune. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page