top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Educated Muslims being hounded: Owaisi

Mumbai: AIMIM President Asaduddin Owaisi has flayed what he termed as a ‘media trial’ in the alleged TCS Nashik conversion case and claimed that educated Muslims youth are being deliberately targeted as part of planned ‘hate campaign’, here on Saturday. Reiterating full faith in the judicial process, Owaisi said that justice cannot be handed out through media narratives or television debates and the law must be allowed to take its own course. “We are seeing a very dangerous trend… Now,...

Educated Muslims being hounded: Owaisi

Mumbai: AIMIM President Asaduddin Owaisi has flayed what he termed as a ‘media trial’ in the alleged TCS Nashik conversion case and claimed that educated Muslims youth are being deliberately targeted as part of planned ‘hate campaign’, here on Saturday. Reiterating full faith in the judicial process, Owaisi said that justice cannot be handed out through media narratives or television debates and the law must be allowed to take its own course. “We are seeing a very dangerous trend… Now, educated Muslims are being picked out for orchestrated allegations and media campaigns. This doesn’t augur well for society and justice itself with the media playing the role of the judge and jury,” said Owaisi sharply. Flanked by the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen state President Imtiaz Jaleel, Owaisi also emphatically said that it was wrong to link his party with the TCS case prime accused Nida Khan, “who will be ultimately proven innocent in the courts”. He expressed concerns over the slur campaign driven by malice and political motives against his party as well as Nida Khan in some sections of the media even before the investigations were completed or a judicial scrutiny. “Merely because some allegations have been hurled at a young woman professional, attempts are being made to paint her ‘guilty’ through media trials, even before judicial scrutiny. But, we have complete faith in the judiciary and are confident that the court will eventually exonerate her,” asserted Owaisi. Public Discourse Raising questions on the probe and accompanying public discourse with stress on the alleged recovery of certain ‘evidence’ from Nida Khan’s home, he sharply questioned: “Since when have a burqa, a niqab or religious literature become objectionable… Is wearing a hijab now regarded as evidence of a crime?” He said that these details along with baseless allegations are sensationalism in the media to create further prejudice against the minority community and reflected a deep-rooted hostility aimed at harassing educated Muslim men and women. Owaisi pointed out that a complaint in the TCS Nashik case was filed by a leader linked with the ruling party, and as per the software giant’s statement, Nida Khan was not with its HR Department and transferred even before the controversy erupted, contradicting several media reports. Of the nine cases lodged in the matter till date, in one case, she was accused of hurting religious sentiments, but nobody can comment on it before the court pronounces its verdict, he pointed out. Court Fight Dismissing attempts to drag and link the AIMIM into the row, he referred to a party Municipal Corporator Matin Patel who was booked merely on the basis of certain allegations and vowed to contest the matter in the court. Here Owaisi cited multiple examples of educated Muslims being scrutinised – including in Delhi when some educated youths were arrested for possessing a book by the legendary Urdu poet Mirza Ghalib and they were later released. There was another one from Allahabad where some Muslim boys were targeted for writing an Urdu ‘sher’ (couplet) prompting judicial intervention, and predicted that even in the Nashik TCS case, the truth will ultimately prevail as no criminal charges against Nida Khan may stand. AIMIM to set up voter help-desks AIMIM President and Hyderabad MP, Asaduddin Owaisi said his party is developing a digital application containing electoral records of all 288 Assembly constituencies in Maharashtra for 2002-2024, to help voters in the SIR process. For this, the AIMIM will set up help desk centers in its strongholds to facilitate the process and ensure proper utilisation of voter data. Alleging discrepancies in electoral records, he said such errors create huge problems for the voters, especially the poor or illiterates. Owaisi mentioned how of the nearly 27 lakh names placed in the adjudication list in West Bengal, “90 pc were poor Muslims.” These centers would be open for all Muslims, Buddhists, Christians, Dalits, Adivasis and the general public needing assistance with the electoral records.

India’s Entebbe Moment?

In the shock and fury that followed the massacre in Pahalgam, I reached almost instinctively for an old paperback on my shelf. It was a Bantam edition of ‘90 Minutes at Entebbe’ by William Stevenson. I had first read it in college. Now, more than two decades later, the pages had yellowed, but the story still moved with the same iron-boned precision as if the commandos might burst into the pages at any moment.


On June 27, 1976, an Air France flight from Tel Aviv to Paris was hijacked and flown to Entebbe, Uganda. The hijackers - members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the German Baader-Meinhof gang - were given safe harbour by Uganda’s dictator, Idi Amin. A deadline was issued. Israel had 72 hours to release Palestinian prisoners or watch its citizens die.


In 90 Minutes at Entebbe, Stevenson collates eyewitness accounts, cables, radio intercepts, and military briefings into a narrative that still grips. There are arguments within the Israeli cabinet, coded briefings and one question that rises through the tension like smoke: what happens to a nation when it is faced with a stark choice between capitulation and principle?


Israel’s answer was decisive and breathtaking in its audacity. It struck on July 4, 1976 in the dead of night as the rescue mission codenamed ‘Operation Thunderbolt’ landed at Entebbe. The raid took just under an hour. All the hijackers were killed. 102 of the 106 hostages (four were killed) were freed. Current Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s elder brother, Yonatan ‘Yonni’ Netanyahu was the only Israeli commando killed in the operation that has since become a byword for audacity. Israel’s message to the world was clear: a nation only stays sovereign if it is willing to act.


A year later in 1977, NBC released ‘The Raid on Entebbe,’ a made-for-TV film – the best of the three films on the subject that came out at the same time. Directed by Irvin Kershner, the film stars Peter Finch as Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in his final screen role. Finch’s wonderful performance is all restraint and quiet fury.


In the film, Rabin is exhausted: worn down by memory, shadowed by the Holocaust, cautious in the face of action. But when the moment comes, he does not hesitate. Finch plays him not as a war hawk, but as a man who knows history. In one scene, he listens as his advisers debate. His eyes narrow. His hands do not move. Then, with a voice barely above a whisper, he says: “If we don’t go now, we’ll never go again.”


It is not a triumphant line. It is a line spoken by a man who understands what forgetting looks like. The film is taut, its tension coiled not just in the action sequences but in the corridors of power and the clipped urgency of phone calls. YaphetKotto plays Idi Amin with terrifying charm while Horst Buchholz, as the lead hijacker, evokes both menace and a flicker of sympathy. Among the film’s illustrious cast, Charles Bronson is the big name, bringing a steely determination and quiet sympathy to his role as Brigadier General Dan Shomron who leads the mission.


Watching the film today, in a world where terror is ambient and wars blur into hashtags, ‘The Raid on Entebbe’ feels almost foreign. Not because it glorifies war (it doesn’t) but because it portrays clarity. A clarity that most democracies, including ours, have lost.


Post-Pahalgam, I could not help reflecting on India’s contrasting record of humiliations endured and opportunities squandered. The nadir came in December 1999, when Indian Airlines flight IC-814 was hijacked en route to Delhi and diverted to Kandahar. For days, the world watched as India - paralysed, pleading and ultimately surrendering - released three of its most dangerous terrorists including Masood Azhar in exchange for the passengers’ lives. Azhar would go on to mastermind the 2001 Parliament attack and the 2019 Pulwama bombing among others. The decision to capitulate at Kandahar is still paying dividends in blood.


Reading and watching the book and film on the Entebbe operation made me reflect that where Israel sends special forces, India sends negotiators. Where Israel says “never again,” India has largely said “let’s move on.”


Perhaps that’s why I turned back to 90 Minutes at Entebbe after Pahalgam. Not for nostalgia. But for memory. For a time when democracies were able to answer back with steel and speed.

Comments


bottom of page