top of page

By:

Rajendra Pandharpure

15 April 2025 at 7:55:54 pm

From Exam Ire to Political Tussle

The agitation by MPSC aspirants against examination irregularities has drawn Pune’s rival political camps into the fray. Pune: The student agitation demanding an inquiry into alleged irregularities in Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) examinations has increasingly acquired a political dimension. A campaign for accountability and end to examination-related malpractices has now snowballed into a political contest with competing narratives. The turning point came when the city’s BJP...

From Exam Ire to Political Tussle

The agitation by MPSC aspirants against examination irregularities has drawn Pune’s rival political camps into the fray. Pune: The student agitation demanding an inquiry into alleged irregularities in Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) examinations has increasingly acquired a political dimension. A campaign for accountability and end to examination-related malpractices has now snowballed into a political contest with competing narratives. The turning point came when the city’s BJP leaders took to the streets to counter the agitation, while NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) MLA Rohit Pawar assumed a prominent role in leading the students. His intervention brought the protest greater political visibility, but also invited allegations that an issue rooted in students’ grievances was being turned into a political confrontation. The students, however, have appeared unwilling to accept the suggestion that the agitation had been appropriated by politicians. Many stood by Rohit Pawar, with some arguing that his presence had helped protect them from police harassment. Their response underscored a central tension in student movements: political support can amplify a cause, but it can also shift attention from the demands that brought protesters to the streets in the first place. Public Discontent The Pune agitation comes amid a series of protests across Maharashtra and elsewhere, reflecting a broader willingness among sections of the public to take grievances directly to the streets. These include tribal students’ demands for better hostel facilities, agitations by the Maratha community, a campaign in Mumbai seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, and a movement against noise pollution in Pune. The political context has also been shaped by student-led mobilisations elsewhere, most notably the protest launched by Abhijit Dipke and his Cockroach Janata Party against the NEET exam leak that ultimately led to the resignation of then Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. In Maharashtra, Dipke’s presence at the Pune protest added another layer to the unfolding political contest. Congress leader Balasaheb Thorat, MP Praniti Shinde, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut, Aaditya Thackeray, Maratha reservation activist Manoj Jarange Patil and Sujat Ambedkar were among those who visited the protest site. The gathering of leaders from different political formations highlighted the breadth of support for the students’ cause, while demonstrating how quickly an agitation over an administrative issue becomes a platform for parties seeking to challenge the government on questions of employment and public accountability. Citywide Shutdown Rohit Pawar’s warning that he would call for a Pune bandh marked a significant escalation in the rhetoric surrounding the protest. The BJP and the Sangh Parivar reacted sharply, accusing him of attempting to create unrest in the city. Pune Mayor Manjusha Nagpure convened a meeting to criticise the proposed shutdown, bringing the dispute further into the political arena. MNS chief Raj Thackeray’s intervention has added a different perspective. He observed that no government could provide jobs to all candidates preparing for MPSC examinations. The BJP seized on the remark, presenting it as an implicit rebuttal of Rohit Pawar’s approach. Reports of apparent differences between the two leaders’ positions and observations about their body language following Thackeray’s speech has in turn fuelled speculation about a rift within the broader political support surrounding the protest. That said, the larger issue remains distinct from the political exchanges. The limited availability of government jobs is one challenge; ensuring fair, transparent and credible recruitment processes is another. Even if the state cannot provide employment to every aspirant, students can reasonably expect examinations to be conducted without irregularities and complaints to be addressed through credible mechanisms. The agitation has also encountered a legal challenge, with a petition filed in the High Court over roads being blocked by the protest. The court reprimanded the state government, observing that it was not taking the students’ demands seriously, and suggested that the protesters call off their agitation and concentrate on their studies. The students, however, are continuing with their protest, while insisting on concrete action from the government.

India waits to lasso diamantaire Mehul Choksi

Apr 14, 2025
5 min read

Mumbai: India rubbed its hands gleefully as the Belgium Police honoured its request to arrest the absconder diamantaire Mehul Chinubhai Choksi – more than seven years after he, along with his nephew Nirav Deepak Modi - allegedly duped the Punjab National Bank of nearly Rs. 13,800-crores.

 

The scam involving the ‘Mehul Mama-Nirav Bhanja’ erupted in Jan 2018, after the PNB lodged a complaint with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

 

By then the kin, along with many of their family members, winked and slipped out of the country, leaving a rattled India rubbing its palms in disappointment.

 

A political-cum-financial storm raged, embarrassing the Bharatiya Janata Party government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi a year before the Lok Sabha elections.

 

Multiple agencies launched a multi-pronged probe into what became the biggest banking scam in the past quarter century – and almost four times bigger than the stock market-cum-banking fraud the late Big Bull Harshad Mehta had inflicted on the Indian economy 33 years ago (in April 1992) – when it was just opening up.

 

In Belgium

According to official reports, Choksi was living with his Belgium citizen-wife Preeti in Antwerp, a global diamond hub, presumably for the past 18 months on a ‘residency permit’ acquired through questionable means, for medical reasons.

 

Earlier, he shot to the headers (June 2021) while being taken in a wheelchair to a court by the Dominican Republic's Police on charges of sneaking into the small country in the Caribbean Sea, North America.

 

Interestingly, as the Antigua & Barbuda government initiated the process to cancel his citizenship acquired through an investor visa, Choksi had suddenly gone ‘missing’ till he surfaced in the Dominican Republic.

 

The April 2025 action by Belgium followed a request by India’s CBI and the financial frauds specialist Enforcement Directorate (ED) to nab Choksi as the InterPol had revoked his Red Corner Notice in 2023.

 

Mama and Bhanja

‘Mama’ Choksi is the founder-owner of Gitanjali Group while ‘bhanja’ Nirav’s Firestar plus other companies – and the duo, with some PNB officials hand-in-glove – conspired to make a ‘mamu’ of not only PNB, but other banks, as it subsequently tumbled out.

 

After making a quiet exit, Choksi was detected living in the verdant Antigua & Barbuda Isles (West Indies), then attempted entry to the Dominican Republic, was sent back to Antigua & Barbuda and then went to Belgium where he was nabbed on Sunday.

 

Similarly, Modi was found sauntering on the streets of London and nabbed in March 2019. He remains in jail there since India's extradition is still pending.

 

However, India is keeping its fingers crossed that it may finally lay hands on Choksi, bring him to India and face trial in the PNB scam, though it may take time.

 

Born in Mumbai (1959) and educated in Gujarat, Choksi, 66, and wife Preeti have three children.

 

The Rs. 13,800-crore PNB scam

In the modus operandi revealed after India’s second-largest PSU bank PNB admitted it was scammed, Choksi and Modi used fraudulent Letters of Undertaking (LoU) to get overseas credits or loans from Indian banks.

 

The PNB first informed the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) of the fraud and then lodged a criminal complaint with the CBI in Jan. 2018, plus another CBI complaint in Feb, that led to a FIR against Modi and Choksi and their companies.

 

The ED entered the scene to probe the allegations of money-laundering through the LoUs – which they allegedly misused to avail short-term business finances from foreign branches of Indian banks.

 

The probe said that the duo were availing the LoUs from the PNB’s Brady House Branch from March 2011, and over the next six-seven years, managed to get a whopping 1,200-plus LoUs like a breeze with the help of some friendly bankers within.

 

Post-scam, the gold-diamond companies Gitanjali Group and Firestone Group with multiple operations in India and abroad have largely wound up, while some personal assets of the mama-bhanja have been auctioned to recover a part of the dues.

 

ED's plea to declare Choksi fugitive stuck for seven years

Even as absconding diamantaire Mehul Choksi, a key accused in the Punjab National Bank loan fraud case, has been arrested in Belgium, the ED's plea to declare him a fugitive economic offender has been pending before a court in Mumbai for nearly seven years.


Choksi, 65, and his nephew diamantaire Nirav Modi are the prime accused in the Rs 13,000 crore PNB bank loan fraud case. Choksi was arrested in Belgium following an extradition request by Indian probe agencies, official sources said on Monday.


The Enforcement Directorate had filed the application in July 2018, seeking to declare Choksi an FEO and confiscate his assets under provisions of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act.


However, the matter has witnessed repeated delays owing to a barrage of applications filed by the accused in the PMLA court and the Bombay High Court alleging procedural lapses in the Enforcement Directorate's plea.


"The court is kept busy with frivolous applications, and hearing on our application to declare him (Choksi) an FEO has been adjourned for the past seven years,” an ED officer had said after the hearing was once again deferred this February.


"The court should have continued the hearing and taken a decision on the future course of action once the application was moved," the officer had said.

He had urged the court to take note of the repeated filing of similar applications and to not entertain them.


Choksi's lawyer had informed the court that the accused was undergoing treatment for suspected cancer in Belgium and intended to file an application in connection with his health.


Under the FEO Act, an individual can be declared a Fugitive Economic Offender if a warrant has been issued against him for an offence involving Rs 100 crore or more and he has left India while refusing to return. Once declared an FEO, the person's property can be confiscated by the investigating agency.


Choksi had challenged the ED's application in the Bombay High Court, alleging that the agency "had not followed proper procedure before filing the application and, hence, it stands vitiated".


However, in September 2023, the High Court dismissed his plea, ruling that the ED had adhered to the prescribed format under the FEO Act. It also vacated a stay on the special court's proceedings.


Despite this, the hearing on declaring Choksi FEO could not commence, with Choksi continuing to file applications before the special court through his lawyers.


While most of these pleas have been dismissed, a few remain pending. His latest attempt to stall proceedings through a plea to recall the notice issued on the ED's FEO application was rejected in December 2023.


According to ED officials, Choksi left India under suspicious circumstances in early January 2018.


Shifting stance

Choksi's counsel has argued that the ED kept shifting its stance on the material grounds for declaring him an FEO and that the suspension of his Indian passport made it impossible for him to return for investigation.

The court, however, rejected this argument, stating that the notice was issued based on accurate information and not based on "wrong facts or mistaken assumptions".


ED claimed the accused left the country under suspicious circumstances in the first week of January 2018.


Nirav Modi has already been declared as an FEO by the special court. He has been lodged in jail in London since 2019.

Comments


bottom of page