top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Is Jarange’s Agitation Causing Caste Division?

Updated: Oct 21, 2024


Is Jarange’s Agitation Causing Caste Division?

In progressive Maharashtra, with its legacy of Mahatma Phule, Shahu Maharaj, and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, who fought against caste discrimination, a new challenge to the state’s stability has emerged. Manoj Jarange’s Maratha reservation movement is fostering divisions in the Hindu community along caste lines. This situation has been worsened by social media posts, reels, and graphics that fuel caste-based sentiments igniting communal unrest across Maharashtra.

In certain Marathwada districts, there have been social boycotts, village bans, and other divisive experiments due to Jarange’s uncompromising stance. Districts such as Jalna, Beed, and Dharashiv are experiencing considerable unrest, with the OBC community living in fear. This situation debates the legitimacy of village bans on OBCs, the demand for Muslim reservations from OBC quotas, and the subsequent embrace of Muslims, all under the guise of the Maratha reservation movement.

Multiple Hindu nationalist organisations across Maharashtra desire reservations for the needy within the Maratha community. Even Sambhaji Bhide visited the hunger strike site at Antarwali Sarati in support. However, the recent events and statements made by Manoj Jarange create doubts about whether this fight is genuinely for reservation or if it is a ploy to destabilise Maharashtra and secure votes for a particular political party.

Jarange’s rhetorics are often riddled with crude language directed at BJP leaders, while the real opponents of the Maratha reservation go unscathed. Leaders like Sharad Pawar, who explicitly stated that he doesn’t support Maratha reservations from the OBC quota, and other MVA leaders who warned the government not to touch OBC reservations, are indirectly advocating against Marathas getting OBC reservations. However, Jarange reserves his vile language towards Chhagan Bhujbal and Prasad Lad, while sparing Pawar and MVA leaders. This double standard is being quietly discussed by the common man in Maharashtra.

Additionally, Jarange’s advocacy for Muslim reservations from the OBC quota, despite such reservations being prohibited on religious grounds in India. He seems intent on appealing to the Muslim community, as gathered by significant Muslim participation during his rallies. This raises concerns that this movement might be politically motivated, aiming to forge an unnatural Maratha-Muslim alliance for electoral gains.By sowing discord between OBCs and Marathas and rallying Muslim support, Jarange appears to be inciting a conflict within the Hindu community. This is particularly concerning in the context of past tensions, such as Love Jihad incidents and riots during Shiv Jayanti processions. The involvement of Muslims in the Maratha reservation movement appears increasingly problematic and politically motivated.

Finally, aligning with those who opposed the renaming of Aurangabad to Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar in honor of Sambhaji Maharaj, who was brutally tortured by Aurangzeb, further complicates the narrative. The efforts to create an unnatural Maratha-Muslim alliance under the guise of the reservation movement must be scrutinised.


(The writer is a resident of Akola. Views personal)

Comments


bottom of page