top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi...

Congress’ solo path for ‘ideological survival’

Mumbai: The Congress party’s decision to contest the forthcoming BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections independently is being viewed as an attempt to reclaim its ideological space among the public and restore credibility within its cadre, senior leaders indicated. The announcement - made by AICC General Secretary Ramesh Chennithala alongside state president Harshwardhan Sapkal and Mumbai Congress chief Varsha Gaikwad - did not trigger a backlash from the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) partners, the Nationalist Congress Party (SP) and Shiv Sena (UBT). According to Congress insiders, the move is the outcome of more than a year of intense internal consultations following the party’ dismal performance in the 2024 Assembly elections, belying huge expectations. A broad consensus reportedly emerged that the party should chart a “lone-wolf” course to safeguard the core ideals of Congress, turning140-years-old, next month. State and Mumbai-level Congress leaders, speaking off the record, said that although the party gained momentum in the 2019 Assembly and 2024 Lok Sabha elections, it was frequently constrained by alliance compulsions. Several MVA partners, they claimed, remained unyielding on larger ideological and political issues. “The Congress had to compromise repeatedly and soften its position, but endured it as part of ‘alliance dharma’. Others did not reciprocate in the same spirit. They made unilateral announcements and declared candidates or policies without consensus,” a senior state leader remarked. Avoid liabilities He added that some alliance-backed candidates later proved to be liabilities. Many either lost narrowly or, even after winning with the support of Congress workers, defected to Mahayuti constituents - the Bharatiya Janata Party, Shiv Sena, or the Nationalist Congress Party. “More than five dozen such desertions have taken place so far, which is unethical, backstabbing the voters and a waste of all our efforts,” he rued. A Mumbai office-bearer elaborated that in certain constituencies, Congress workers effectively propelled weak allied candidates through the campaign. “Our assessment is that post-split, some partners have alienated their grassroots base, especially in the mofussil regions. They increasingly rely on Congress workers. This is causing disillusionment among our cadre, who see deserving leaders being sidelined and organisational growth stagnating,” he said. Chennithala’s declaration on Saturday was unambiguous: “We will contest all 227 seats independently in the BMC polls. This is the demand of our leaders and workers - to go alone in the civic elections.” Gaikwad added that the Congress is a “cultured and respectable party” that cannot ally with just anyone—a subtle reference to the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), which had earlier targeted North Indians and other communities and is now bidding for an electoral arrangement with the SS(UBT). Both state and city leaders reiterated that barring the BMC elections - where the Congress will take the ‘ekla chalo’ route - the MVA alliance remains intact. This is despite the sharp criticism recently levelled at the Congress by senior SS(UBT) leader Ambadas Danve following the Bihar results. “We are confident that secular-minded voters will support the Congress' fight against the BJP-RSS in local body elections. We welcome backing from like-minded parties and hope to finalize understandings with some soon,” a state functionary hinted. Meanwhile, Chennithala’s firm stance has triggered speculation in political circles about whether the Congress’ informal ‘black-sheep' policy vis-a-vis certain parties will extend beyond the BMC polls.

Knesset in Crisis

A battle over God and guns leaves Netanyahu in political purgatory.

ree

In Israel, governments seldom die of natural causes. Instead, they implode. The recent resignation of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party from Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling coalition has left Israel’s longest-serving prime minister politically exposed once again. The departure follows a similar move by United Torah Judaism (UTJ) earlier in the week, both over the government’s failure to guarantee continued military draft exemptions for Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) yeshiva students. The exits have reduced Netanyahu’s grip on the Knesset to a precarious minority of just 50 of 120 seats.


Since Israel’s founding, ultra-Orthodox men studying in religious seminaries have been largely exempt from mandatory military service. But 21 months into Israel’s grinding war in Gaza, public tolerance for this arrangement is fraying. While the sons and daughters of secular Israelis are sent to fight, the sight of thousands of Haredi men exempted from the front lines is increasingly resented. Netanyahu’s efforts to codify permanent exemptions have angered a broad swathe of the population and even his own allies.


For now, the collapse is partial. Shas has left the cabinet but promises not to vote down the government. That leaves Netanyahu at the mercy of his far-right coalition partners, who have little appetite for compromise. The government’s agenda, already beholden to figures like Itamar Ben-Gvir, the far-right national security minister, will now become even more extreme, especially on matters related to Gaza. With ceasefire talks underway, Netanyahu’s room for manoeuvre just got smaller.


The paradox of Israeli politics is that its electoral system, which is proportional representation with a low threshold, ensures no party ever rules alone. Governments are stitched together from coalitions that often include ideological opposites. In such an environment, the ultra-Orthodox parties, though representing only about 13 percent of the population, wield outsize power. They vote as blocs, demand concrete religious concessions and are expert in the political dark arts of brinkmanship.


Shas, in particular, has long been a master of this game. It has served in coalitions led by left-leaning Labour, centrist Kadima, and right-wing Likud. Its loyalty is transactional. In 1999, when Ehud Barak defeated Netanyahu in a surprise landslide, it was partly because Shas withheld support. In 2015, the party returned to Likud's fold, extracting generous welfare concessions and funding for religious schools.


Minority governments in Israel are not unprecedented, but they are always short-lived. In 1990, Yitzhak Shamir briefly led a minority government after Labour pulled out. In 2022, the ‘change government’ led by Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid lost its majority just a year into power. Netanyahu himself has governed from the edge before, but never while waging a major war and fending off both international pressure and domestic protest.


The timing of the ultra-Orthodox walkout is telling. The Knesset is scheduled to begin a three-month recess on July 27, giving Netanyahu a rare window to recalibrate. But the optics are damning. As bodies pile up in Gaza and Israelis debate the future of the military draft, Netanyahu appears unable to govern. This perception is worsened by his ongoing corruption trial that has bolstered opposition leader Yair Lapid, who wasted no time in declaring the government “illegitimate” and demanding new elections.


Discontent over the Gaza war, inflation and judicial overreach has swelled into periodic mass protests. The issue of Haredi conscription has only intensified the sense that Netanyahu’s coalition represents a narrow sectarian agenda rather than the national interest.


Still, writing off Netanyahu would be premature. The man known as ‘the magician’ has an uncanny ability to survive political near-death experiences. His current government, formed in December 2022, was already the most right-wing and religious in Israel’s history. Stripped of two ultra-Orthodox pillars, it is a skeleton cabinet, capable of limping forward but unable to legislate, reform or pursue diplomacy.


Netanyahu’s options are narrowing. He could call early elections. He could court centrist defectors. Or he could cling on, hoping that geopolitical winds tilt events in his favour.

Comments


bottom of page