top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 4:59:11 pm

Fadnavis reins in Sena’s Marathi push

AI generated image Mumbai: The ruling Mahayuti coalition in Maharashtra is witnessing a delicate political balancing act, with Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis increasingly overriding key decisions of alliance partners, particularly the Shiv Sena, while simultaneously attempting to placate them on other fronts. The tension within the alliance came to the fore on Thursday when Fadnavis stepped in to dilute a controversial mandate enforced by Shiv Sena Transport Minister Pratap Sarnaik, which...

Fadnavis reins in Sena’s Marathi push

AI generated image Mumbai: The ruling Mahayuti coalition in Maharashtra is witnessing a delicate political balancing act, with Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis increasingly overriding key decisions of alliance partners, particularly the Shiv Sena, while simultaneously attempting to placate them on other fronts. The tension within the alliance came to the fore on Thursday when Fadnavis stepped in to dilute a controversial mandate enforced by Shiv Sena Transport Minister Pratap Sarnaik, which required auto-rickshaw and taxi drivers in Mumbai to possess basic Marathi language proficiency. The Transport Department’s enforcement drive, which threatened non-Marathi-speaking drivers with suspension or cancellation of their licences, sparked outrage among North Indian drivers who form a sizeable section of the public transport workforce in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR). Protests brought parts of Mumbai, including Kandivali and Malad, to a standstill. Recognising the potential electoral fallout, Fadnavis intervened, saying drivers need not be “experts” in Marathi. He also extended the grace period for drivers to acquire a working knowledge of the language to one year, effectively diluting Sarnaik’s hardline stance. Fadnavis announced the decision after a delegation of transport operators met him. The episode highlights the conflicting political compulsions of the Mahayuti partners. Eknath Shinde’s Shiv Sena is keen to pursue a pro-Marathi, “sons of the soil” agenda to consolidate its traditional voter base and counter the rival Shiv Sena (UBT) faction led by Uddhav Thackeray. The BJP, however, relies heavily on North Indian and migrant voters in the MMR, particularly as crucial civic and state elections approach. Any aggressive regional policy that alienates this constituency could have electoral consequences for the party. The Marathi language issue is not an isolated instance of Fadnavis stepping in to override decisions associated with the Shiv Sena. It fits into a broader pattern of the chief minister’s administration reviewing or reversing several initiatives of the previous government headed by Shinde. In April 2026, the BJP-led Environment Department, headed by Minister Pankaja Munde, scrapped 14 lake conservation projects, 11 of which had been cleared during Shinde’s tenure, and ordered recovery of more than Rs 73 crore. The Fadnavis government has also modified several initiatives introduced by the previous regime. In January 2025, it altered Shinde’s three-course school meal plan, placing the responsibility on local school management committees to raise funds for sweet dishes. In April 2025, the government scrapped the ‘One State, One Uniform’ policy for schools. A Rs 3,200-crore tender for mechanised housekeeping services at government hospitals, issued under the Shinde government, was also stayed. Yet, Fadnavis remains conscious of the need to preserve the fragile alliance. To manage growing resentment within the Sena, he has adopted what can be described as a ‘blow hot, blow cold’ approach — overriding decisions when they clash with the BJP’s broader political interests while offering political concessions on other fronts. One such move was the recent appointment of Shiv Sena leader Bharat Gogawale as Guardian Minister of the politically important Raigad district, ending a 19-month-long tussle over the post. At the same time, the Mahayuti government recently reduced the powers exercised by Guardian Ministers over District Planning Committee (DPC) funds, directing that 70 per cent of the funds be allocated directly to local MLAs. The move is aimed at reducing the concentration of financial powers with individual ministers. As the Mahayuti navigates these competing interests, Fadnavis has also instructed alliance partners to resolve disputes internally and avoid public sparring. However, the latest confrontation over the Marathi language requirement underscores the limits of that arrangement. While Fadnavis continues to use his authority to protect the BJP’s broader electoral interests, the Shiv Sena remains under pressure to assert its regional identity and distinguish itself from the Thackeray faction. With elections approaching, balancing these competing political priorities is likely to remain one of the biggest challenges for the Mahayuti government.

Lasers and Leviathans

A flashpoint in the Red Sea reveals China’s expanding ambitions and Europe’s maritime vulnerability.

A Chinese warship has sparked diplomatic fury in Berlin after allegedly targeting a German surveillance aircraft with a military-grade laser during a European Union maritime mission in the Red Sea. The incident near the coast of Yemen forced the aircraft—part of the EU’s ASPIDES mission to protect civilian shipping from Houthi rebel attacks—to abort its flight and retreat to base in Djibouti. Following which Germany summoned China’s ambassador and condemned the episode as “entirely unacceptable.”


Though no injuries were reported, the geopolitical ramifications are far-reaching. For the first time, a European NATO member—not the United States or Australia—has accused China of hostile targeting in international waters. With tensions already simmering in the Red Sea due to Iranian-backed Houthi strikes on commercial vessels, Beijing’s silent but deliberate escalation adds a new layer of danger to one of the world’s most volatile maritime corridors.


The targeted aircraft, a Multi-Sensor Platform (MSP) operated by a civilian contractor with German military personnel on board, was conducting a routine reconnaissance sortie under Operation ASPIDES—an EU-led initiative launched in February to safeguard trade routes through the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, and the Indian Ocean. Germany’s defence ministry said the laser was fired without prior warning even though the Chinese warship had been seen repeatedly in the area.


The United States has long complained of similar laser incidents in the Indo-Pacific, including one in 2020 near Guam. What’s new is the European angle. China has rarely, if ever, confronted a European surveillance aircraft with such tactics.


The Red Sea is no longer merely a thoroughfare for global shipping. It is now a crowded chessboard where naval vessels from the US, EU, China, Iran and others jostle in close quarters amid proxy wars, piracy and regional rivalries. Since 2023, Houthi rebels aligned with Iran have repeatedly attacked cargo vessels, prompting the launch of ASPIDES as a defensive shield. The EU mission, notably non-combative, aims to protect civilian ships, not to hunt rebels or enforce blockades. The Chinese laser strike thus marks a peculiar escalation when viewed in this light.


China’s presence in the western Indian Ocean has expanded steadily since it opened its first overseas naval base in Djibouti in 2017. Beijing justifies its deployments as part of international anti-piracy or humanitarian operations. But the strategic integration of naval activity, commercial shipping, and coercive signalling is increasingly hard to ignore. Its behaviour in the South China Sea is now being exported to waters once considered far from its primary sphere of influence.


Europe is clearly not ready. ASPIDES is a mission built on diplomacy, not deterrence. Its mandate is defensive. Its participants (from Belgium and Finland to Greece) are hardly in a position to engage in hard-power confrontation with a global military heavyweight like China. But the laser incident forces a reckoning: are European forces simply observers in contested waters, or stakeholders willing to stand firm?


Germany, traditionally cautious about military deployments, has been taking baby steps toward becoming what Chancellor Olaf Scholz has called a “security provider.” Its contribution to ASPIDES is part of that ambition. But ambition is not enough. Clearer rules of engagement, robust deconfliction protocols, and better coordination with allies like the US are now urgently needed, not least because China has made it clear that Europe is not exempt from the theatre of pressure it once reserved for Asia.


The European Union, too, must wake up to the reality that its economic rival is becoming a strategic challenger. For years, Brussels has attempted to balance trade ties with security concerns. Now Chinese lasers have cut through that illusion. The silence from Beijing since the incident is telling. China no longer feels the need to explain. It acts.


As the Red Sea grows more militarised, the space for peaceful, rules-based cooperation is shrinking. Europe’s missions, however well-intentioned, are now in the crosshairs. A laser may not cause a fire, but it casts a long shadow.

Comments


bottom of page