top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Law student challenges double standards in FIRs

Updated: Apr 1, 2025

Law student

Mumbai: In a recent stand-up comedy show, comedian Kunal Kamra found himself embroiled in controversy after performing a satirical song targeting Maharashtra's Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde. Following this performance, four First Information Reports (FIRs) have been filed against Kamra in various locations across Maharashtra.

 

In response to the legal actions taken against him, law student Harshvardhan Khandekar, through Advocate Amit Kataranaware, has issued a legal notice to several high-ranking officials, including the Chief Secretary of Maharashtra, the Additional Chief Secretary of the Home Department, the Director General of Police, the Mumbai Police Commissioner, and the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. The notice argues that there is a double standard in the application of the law, pointing out that while opposition leader Ajit Pawar and leaders from the Uddhav Thackeray faction, including Sanjay Raut, have also referred to Shinde as a "traitor," only Kamra has faced legal repercussions.

 

The notice highlights that if the police claim Kamra's use of the term "traitor" constitutes a crime, then similar statements made by Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis in the Maharashtra Assembly should also warrant legal action against him. 

 

According to the Indian Citizen Security Code under Section 173(3) and the Indian Penal Code Section 353, prior approval from a police officer of the rank of Deputy Superintendent is required for offenses punishable by up to two years. The notice alleges that the police failed to adhere to these regulations. Furthermore, it cites Article 20(2) of the Indian Constitution, which prohibits multiple prosecutions for the same offense, arguing that the filing of four FIRs against Kamra is unconstitutional.

 

While the Madras High Court has granted Kamra interim relief from arrest, the notice warns that he may still face danger upon appearing before the Khar police. It also states that if a satisfactory response is not received within 24 hours, legal action will be pursued against the relevant officials and police.

Comments


bottom of page