top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law...

‘Save Sharia’ campaign feeds Hindutva politics

Mumbai: Prominent Muslims and others have slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s ‘Save India, Save Sharia’ nationwide campaign, alleging that it could deepen polarization while willy-nilly supporting the very forces the AIMPLB claims to oppose. Launched on Sep. 17 – coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 76th birthday – the AIMPLB’s 3-month-long campaign is aimed at mobilizing public opinion around protecting the Constitutional rights, preserving the Muslim Personal Law within the framework of safeguarding India’s pluralistic and democratic character. The AIMPLB leaders said they are soliciting support of people, intellectuals, activists, social and religious organisations who value justice, democracy, peace and the Constitution, to strengthen constitutional supremacy, the rule of law, justice and equality, religious freedom, social harmony and national unity. Around 100 progressive Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals, activists, organisations and supporters have warned that what the AIMPLB presents as a defence of constitutional rights, religious freedom and Muslim identity "could deepen divisions, and may provide political ammunition to right-wing forces". The progressive have accused AIMPLB of selectively invoking Art. 25-30 of the Constitution related to Religious Freedom, while ignoring that these rights are explicitly subject to public order, morality, and health. Moreover, they conveniently bypass Articles 14 and 15, which guarantee equality before the law and prohibit sex or religion-based discrimination. “Following the 2024 Lok Sabha elections where civil society and opposition parties rallied under 'Save the Constitution', the AIMPLB's campaign inadvertently gave the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Sangh Parivar a platform to posture as defenders of constitutional norms. Ahead of crucial state assembly elections, this campaign reinforces false narratives and fuels propaganda that Indian Muslims reject the law of the land,” said the intellectuals. They pointed out how the so-called ‘God-given Shariat Law’ in India is nothing but man-made personal laws and ‘male interpreted patriarchal interpretations’, defended by the AIMPLB. In its September 2016 Supreme Court affidavit in the Triple Talaq case (Sayara Bano v/s. Union of India), the AIMPLB’s affidavit claimed divorce rights belong primarily to husbands because men allegedly possess ‘greater power of decision-making’ and ‘control emotions’. It even argued that without a quick separation option, a husband ‘may resort to illegal, criminal ways of murdering or burning her alive’ - a disturbing rationalization of domestic violence. Claiming these laws are divine, the AIMPLB admitted that “India is a patriarchal society, and therefore personal laws of all communities are aligned with the patriarchal notion...” The progressives countered that Muslim-majority nations globally including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Tunisia and Morocco have codified and reformed personal laws to protect women's rights. “Millions of Muslims live in secular democratic nations with uniform family codes without putting ‘Islam in danger’. The Muslim community’s current legal predicament in India is the direct result of the AIMPLB and conservative leaders failing to proactively reform and codify Muslim Personal Law,” said the progressives sharply. They said that genuine family law reform must guarantee Muslim women equal rights regarding minimum marriage age, abolition of polygamy, mutual divorce, equal inheritance, child custody, adoption, and a ban on female genital mutilation and halala. While secular political parties rarely support the rights of Muslim women, the BJP and the Hindu Right wing do so with an obvious motive: ‘communal polarization’, said the progressives. “The sangh parivar sheds crocodile tears for Muslim women while ignoring relentless hate speech (Love Jihad, Land Jihad…) and hate crimes like mob lynching, bulldozing homes, demolishing mosques or economic boycotts, with chants of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ to intimidate and strike fear. This accompanies state actions targeting Muslims: Waqf Amendment Act, draconian anti-conversion laws, and a weaponised SIR (Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls) to disenfranchise vast sections of the electorate,” they averred. The progressives have sought the active involvement of all enlightened forces, civil society organisations and secular political parties to ensure that the demand for a gender-just, religion-neutral Uniform Civil Code is rooted in equality and human rights, rather than weaponized for communal division. Among the signatories to the appeal are: Naseeruddin Shah, Amol Palekar, Zeenat Shaukat Ali, Anand Patwardhan, Sultan Shaheen, Teesta Setalvad, Ram Puniyani, Tushar Gandhi, Mallika Sarabhai, Ratna Pathak, Feroze Mithiborwala, Anita Cheria, Zakia Soman, Jyothi Yedulla, Noorjehan S. Niaz, Madhu Bhaduri, et al.

LDF battles voter discontent driven by anti-incumbency

Mar 31
3 min read
Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi with party leaders during a public meeting ahead of the Kerala assembly elections in Kallachi, Kerala on Tuesday. | Pic: PTI
Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi with party leaders during a public meeting ahead of the Kerala assembly elections in Kallachi, Kerala on Tuesday. | Pic: PTI

Kerala: Kerala's assembly elections face surging anti-incumbency against LDF after a decade in power, fueled by corruption, nepotism, unemployment, and youth migration. Rahul and Modi intensify a tight triangular race with UDF slightly ahead.

 

Kerala's political landscape stands at a decisive crossroads. As the state heads toward elections for its 140-member Legislative Assembly, the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) faces its most formidable challenge yet: a growing wave of anti-incumbency. After nearly a decade in power, public discontent against the government appears to be steadily consolidating into a broader electoral sentiment. Pre-poll surveys and the outcomes of local body elections both indicate that a significant section of the electorate is dissatisfied with the government's performance.

 

Adding further intrigue to this electoral contest is the high-voltage campaigning by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Both leaders have turned Kerala into a central arena for advancing their respective political narratives, intensifying the tussle, and sharpening the stakes.

 

At the heart of this election lies the issue of anti-incumbency, which has emerged as the defining theme of the campaign. Survey data suggests that nearly 31 percent of respondents rate the government's performance as "very poor," while over 20 percent describe it as "poor." Such figures serve as a stark warning for any incumbent administration. A perceived lack of progress on the development front, limited employment opportunities, and the continued outmigration of youth have further deepened this undercurrent of dissatisfaction.

 

Corruption Allegations

Allegations of corruption have further fueled public discontent. The Karuvannur cooperative bank scam has dealt a significant blow to the government's credibility. In addition, controversies surrounding the gold associated with the Sabarimala temple, alleged irregularities in bar license renewals, and accusations of financial mismanagement in various projects have provided the opposition with ample ammunition to target the ruling dispensation. Seizing on these issues, PM Modi, in multiple rallies, accused both the LDF and the UDF of "corruption and opportunism," describing their approach as a "double game" in politics.

 

On the other hand, Rahul Gandhi has sought to corner the government by placing public concerns at the center of his campaign. He has launched sharp attacks on the LDF government over unemployment, rising prices, and alleged corruption. Notably, his rallies have witnessed strong participation from youth and minority communities, an encouraging sign for the Congress.

 

Meanwhile, the issue of nepotism has also emerged as a prominent theme in this election. The government has faced serious allegations over the appointment of relatives and close associates to ministers' personal staff. The opposition has branded this as the "Pinarayi model of nepotism." Both the Congress and the BJP have raised this issue aggressively, with PM Modi describing it as "dynastic politics" and directly placing both the LDF and the UDF in the dock.

 

Unpredictable Contest

From an electoral standpoint, the contest is equally compelling. Kerala has traditionally witnessed a relatively muted anti-incumbency effect, with a significant number of legislators managing to secure re-election. This time as well, the LDF has re-nominated around 56 of its sitting MLAs, while the Congress has placed its trust in several of its established faces. At the same time, both parties have shown signs of internal discontent and rebellion over ticket distribution, adding another layer of uncertainty to an already closely fought battle.

 

Tight Race

Pre-poll surveys suggest a slight edge for the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF), though both the LDF and the NDA remain firmly in contention. Approximately 8 percent of voters are reportedly still undecided, which could decisively influence the result of the election.

 

PM Modi's frequent visits and high-intensity campaigning have also pushed the BJP to position this contest as a triangular one. While the party's footprint in Kerala remains limited, its efforts to expand its vote share could significantly influence the electoral arithmetic.

 

Taken together, this election in Kerala is not merely about a change of government, but about defining the state's political trajectory. On one hand, the wave of anti-incumbency poses a serious challenge to the LDF. Another side, the Congress is striving to convert this sentiment into a tangible electoral advantage. The aggressive campaigning by high-profile leaders like Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi has elevated the contest to national prominence. All eyes are now on the polling and counting dates. It remains to be seen whether Kerala's voters will follow their traditional pattern of alternating power, or whether the LDF can defy the odds and script history once again.

Comments


bottom of page