top of page

By:

C.S. Krishnamurthy

21 June 2025 at 7:45:51 pm

Let Your SIP Fight Your EMI

When Ramesh bought his first home, he was delighted. The keys were finally in his hand, but another number immediately occupied his mind: the monthly EMI. “Now that I have some money left after paying my EMI, what should I do with it?” he asked his financial adviser. “Or should I start investing? And if I invest, won’t I be carrying a loan unnecessarily?” A home loan can run for 15, 20 or even 25 years, while the desire to become debt-free keeps growing. But does a borrower necessarily have...

Let Your SIP Fight Your EMI

When Ramesh bought his first home, he was delighted. The keys were finally in his hand, but another number immediately occupied his mind: the monthly EMI. “Now that I have some money left after paying my EMI, what should I do with it?” he asked his financial adviser. “Or should I start investing? And if I invest, won’t I be carrying a loan unnecessarily?” A home loan can run for 15, 20 or even 25 years, while the desire to become debt-free keeps growing. But does a borrower necessarily have to choose between repaying the loan faster and investing for the future? What if both could be pursued simultaneously? Could a Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) create a corpus that eventually helps reduce or even close the home loan? The idea merits consideration. A SIP is not a magic formula for becoming debt-free, but it can create a second financial track alongside the regular EMI. Two tracks, one objective Consider an illustration. Suppose a borrower takes a home loan of ₹50 lakh at an assumed interest rate of 8.5 pc for 20 years. The EMI would be around ₹43,400.
Instead of putting every available rupee into the loan, the borrower could consider investing ₹10,000 a month through a SIP, provided the household cash flow permits it. At an assumed annualised return of 12 pc, a ₹10,000 monthly SIP could grow to roughly ₹8.24 lakh in five years, ₹23.23 lakh in 10 years, ₹32.22 lakh in 12 years and ₹50.45 lakh in 15 years. While these are not guaranteed returns, the possibility of higher returns is also not ruled out. Meanwhile, the outstanding home loan would gradually decline through EMIs. Over eight to 10 years, the SIP corpus could become substantial enough to give the borrower an additional financial option. The important point is not to decide today exactly when the loan will be closed, but to review the position when the time comes. Why not simply prepay? Prepaying the home loan provides a relatively certain benefit because every rupee of principal repaid reduces future interest outgo, subject to the loan terms and applicable rules. The SIP serves a different purpose. It creates a financial asset and, over the long term, gives the investor an opportunity to participate in the growth potential of financial markets. The decision point comes later The strategy need not have a fixed finish line. After eight to 10 years, the borrower can review the situation rather than mechanically redeeming the SIP. What is the outstanding loan, the investment value and its performance? What are the prevailing market conditions? Is part-prepayment more appropriate than full repayment? These questions can guide the decision. If the corpus has grown sufficiently and circumstances are favourable, the borrower may consider using part of it to reduce the outstanding loan or, if appropriate, redeeming enough to close the loan completely. If the investment is better retained for the long term, there is no compulsion to exit merely because 10 years have passed. The strength of the strategy lies in this flexibility. Think beyond the loan A long-term SIP is not merely a future home-loan repayment fund. It can become a wealth-creation vehicle in its own right. Compounding rewards patience. A disciplined monthly investment held for the long term can help build a corpus for retirement, children’s education, other life goals or financial independence. Thus, while the home loan moves towards closure through the EMI, the investment has the opportunity to grow alongside it. Once the loan is eventually closed, the EMI disappears. Instead of allowing that money to quietly disappear into lifestyle expenses, the borrower can redirect some or all of the former EMI towards investments. A sensible balance This approach is not a universal prescription. Some borrowers may prefer aggressive loan prepayment, while others may find the combination of EMI and SIP more suitable. The SIP amount should also be comfortable. If ₹10,000 strains the monthly budget, start with less. The strategy should strengthen financial security, not create financial pressure. Adequate emergency savings and appropriate insurance should also form part of the overall financial plan. The larger lesson is simple: a home loan need not automatically put wealth creation on hold. With disciplined cash-flow management, a long-term investment approach and periodic reviews, the EMI can continue paying for today’s home while the SIP works towards tomorrow’s financial freedom. In the end, the question need not be, “Loan or investment?” It can be: “How can I use both wisely?” Disclaimer: “Mutual funds are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully.” (The writer is a retired banker and author. Views personal.)

Lingua Pragmatica

Correspondent
Mar 19, 2025
3 min read

Updated: Mar 20, 2025

As Southern leaders like M.K. Stalin rage against Hindi, Andhra Pradesh’s Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu offers a model of pragmatism over parochialism.

Chandrababu Naidu
Andhra Pradesh

Amid the cacophony of opposition in southern states to Hindi, Andhra Pradesh CM N. Chandrababu Naidu has taken a markedly pragmatic stance by remarking recently in the state Assembly that there was no harm in learning other languages. Hindi, Naidu noted, was useful for communication across India, particularly in political and commercial hubs like Delhi. His remarks, though avoiding explicit mention of the NEP, were widely seen as an endorsement of multilingualism and a rebuke to the linguistic chauvinism that has gripped parts of the South.


Few issues in India stir political passions quite like language. It is not merely a means of communication but a marker of identity, a relic of colonial resistance, and a source of political mobilization. In the southern states, where anti-Hindi sentiment has long been entrenched, the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and its three-language formula have reignited old tensions. No state embodies this defiance more than Tamil Nadu, where the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) led by M.K. Stalin has framed the policy as an assault on its linguistic autonomy.


Naidu’s words, welcomed by his ally and Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan, mark a sharp contrast with the DMK’s position. Tamil Nadu’s hostility towards Hindi dates back to the 1930s, when C. Rajagopalachari’s attempt to introduce it in schools met with fierce resistance. The anti-Hindi agitations of the 1960s cemented the DMK’s ideological stance, with its first Chief Minister, C.N. Annadurai, famously warning that Hindi imposition could push Tamil Nadu towards secession.


The question, however, is whether this rigid opposition serves Tamil Nadu’s interests. While Stalin, with an eye to the upcoming Tamil Nadu Assembly polls, has been relentlessly portraying Hindi as a threat to his state’s regional identity, Naidu, a partner of the BJP-led Centre, is framing it as a tool for economic mobility. His argument is not that Hindi should replace Telugu or English but that it offers a competitive advantage.


The economic case for multilingualism is compelling. Indians who speak multiple languages tend to have better job prospects, higher earnings and greater geographic mobility. Andhra Pradesh’s Telugu-speaking diaspora is a case in point. Telugus make up a significant proportion of Indian-origin professionals in the United States, the Gulf, and Southeast Asia as Naidu pointed out, hinting that this success story was built not on linguistic rigidity but on adaptability.


In a country where inter-state migration is rising and where Hindi remains the most widely spoken language, refusing to learn it amounts to self-imposed isolation. Tamil Nadu’s approach, by contrast, risks limiting its youth. The DMK government has refused to implement the three-language policy, keeping schools strictly bilingual with Tamil and English. Its justification that Hindi is not necessary for global success could be true in a narrow sense but ignores the domestic context. If Tamil filmmakers can dub their movies into Hindi to expand their audience, why should Tamil students be denied access to the language that could open more doors for them within India?


The DMK has accused successive central governments, particularly under the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), of pushing Hindi at the expense of regional languages. Yet, rejecting Hindi outright is an overcorrection. The reality is that Hindi is an important language in India’s economic and political landscape. Naidu’s position, one of accommodation rather than confrontation, offers a middle ground that other Southern leaders would do well to consider.


Some states already recognize this. Karnataka, despite its own history of linguistic pride, has allowed Hindi to be taught as an optional language. Kerala, whose migrants work in Hindi-speaking regions and the Gulf, has been less hostile to Hindi education. Naidu’s model, balancing regional identity with practical necessity, offers a way forward. Languages should be embraced, not politicized. Southern leaders would do well to listen to him.

Comments

bottom of page