top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

Literary Haven

A town better known for its ancient temples, Ambajogai in Beed is now to be transformed into a ‘village of books.’ The project is being pitched by the Maharashtra government as an effort to cultivate a love for reading and breathe fresh life into the town’s literary heritage.


Modelled on a similar experiment in Bhilar (near Mahabaleshwar), Ambajogai’s transformation will involve artistic reading nooks scattered across local landmarks such as Kholeshwar and Yogeshwari colleges, and the samadhi (final resting place) of Mukundraj, the Marathi poet considered a pioneer of vernacular literature. Central to the project will be the republication of Viveksindhu, Mukundraj’s philosophical treatise, long unavailable in print.


In an age when screen time often eclipses book time, creating havens that celebrate the written word is a noble ambition. Yet enthusiasm alone does not guarantee longevity. When it was inaugurated in 2017, Bhilar charmed visitors with its murals, its temples repurposed into reading rooms and a treasure trove of over 15,000 books housed in homes, schools and community spaces as bibliophiles wandered from one location to another in search of poetry, fiction, and history.


But over the years, the momentum has flagged. Lack of sustained investment, wavering administrative focus and a failure to integrate literary tourism with the broader economy have meant that Bhilar, while still a pleasant detour for some tourists, no longer pulses with the same vibrant energy. The lesson is clear: it takes more than a one-off burst of enthusiasm to sustain a book village.


Globally, a few villages have managed to script happier stories. Hay-on-Wye, a tiny town on the border between England and Wales, is the obvious prototype (and the inspiration for Bhilar and many other projects). Once a sleepy farming community, Hay reinvented itself as a ‘town of books’ in the 1960s thanks to the vision of Richard Booth, a maverick bookseller who declared the town an independent literary kingdom. Today, Hay boasts over twenty bookstores and hosts the world-renowned Hay Festival, drawing tens of thousands of visitors annually. Its success lies not just in populating shelves but in creating a living literary ecosystem.


In Belgium, Redu followed a similar path and transformed itself into a ‘book village’ in 1984. Redu’s annual book festival is now a fixture on the European literary calendar. Both Hay and Redu demonstrate that strategic planning, sustained investment and integration with tourism and local commerce are vital for success.


For Ambajogai, the lessons are obvious. Publishing Viveksindhu and setting up artistically adorned reading spots will ignite initial curiosity. But without a steady stream of new titles, engaging literary events, partnerships with schools and universities and the active participation of the local community, the project risks becoming another well-intentioned initiative that fizzles out after the inaugural ribbon is cut.


Literature can indeed transform places. For that to happen, a book village must be treated not as a monument but as a living organism, needing constant care and renewal.

Comments


bottom of page