top of page

By:

Bhaskar Nath Biswal

13 May 2026 at 8:30:30 pm

E-Commerce’s Hidden Threat

The modern Indian marketplace no longer echoes exclusively with the chaotic bustle of traditional bazaars. Instead, it thrives within the silent, instantaneous clicks of smartphone screens. From monthly groceries to high-end electronics, digital retail has fundamentally altered how households across the country consume goods. This transition has undoubtedly unleashed unprecedented convenience, democratizing access to products for millions living outside metro cities. However, this...

E-Commerce’s Hidden Threat

The modern Indian marketplace no longer echoes exclusively with the chaotic bustle of traditional bazaars. Instead, it thrives within the silent, instantaneous clicks of smartphone screens. From monthly groceries to high-end electronics, digital retail has fundamentally altered how households across the country consume goods. This transition has undoubtedly unleashed unprecedented convenience, democratizing access to products for millions living outside metro cities. However, this hyper-connected landscape has also exposed a deeply troubling reality. As digital storefronts expand, so does the shadowy ecosystem of cybercriminals eager to exploit the trust and vulnerabilities of unsuspecting shoppers. The digital transaction, once celebrated as a triumph of modern engineering, is increasingly fraught with unseen hazards. Protecting consumers from e-shopping fraud has now become an urgent national imperative. Fraud Surge The sheer scale of India’s e-commerce revolution provides vital context for why online shopping has become such a high-stakes arena. Recent market estimates indicate that India’s e-commerce economy has surged well beyond $140 billion, driven by over 300 million active digital shoppers. Projections show this user base rapidly swelling toward 400 million, largely fuelled by deep internet penetration, affordable smart phones and seamless payment infrastructure like the Unified Payments Interface across Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. Yet, this remarkable surge in commercial volume has been mirrored by an equally dramatic escalation in cybercrime statistics. Official records from the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal reveal that citizens have filed over 3.8 million cyber fraud complaints, representing staggering financial losses exceeding Rs. 36,000 crore, with a significant portion stemming from fraudulent online retail schemes. Perhaps most alarming is the historical recovery rate, where less than one percent of stolen funds is successfully returned to victims once transactions cross cyber borders. Despite the pervasive presence of online threats, digital consumers frequently fall into predictable traps that expose them to severe risk. A primary misstep is the failure to maintain basic password hygiene, with millions of shoppers reusing weak or identical passwords across multiple e-commerce platforms and email accounts, enabling attackers to execute swift cascading breaches. Furthermore, shoppers frequently bypass critical verification steps in pursuit of speed, such as failing to verify whether a website domain uses secure, encrypted connections before typing in card credentials. Another widespread oversight is performing financial transactions over unsecured public Wi-Fi networks in cafes or transport hubs, which allows bad actors to intercept sensitive data packets in transit. Many consumers also neglect regular software updates on their smartphones, leaving unpatched security vulnerabilities wide open to malware. Above all, emotional urgency remains the greatest weakness. Impulsive buyers frequently ignore glaring red flags, such as suspicious payment requests or unverified seller profiles. Decoding Scams Recognizing that awareness is the frontline of defence, key industry players and digital safety advocates have begun taking structured action. A prominent example is the consumer handbook, ‘Your Guide to Safe Online Shopping’, developed by Safer Internet India and commissioned by Amazon. The initiative aims to demystify complex cyber security concepts and provide consumers with actionable, real-world tools to navigate the digital marketplace safely. The handbook shines a bright light on the most prevalent fraudulent tactics currently plaguing buyers. To combat these threats, the safety guide emphasizes a multi-layered approach to consumer protection. It urges shoppers to verify web addresses meticulously, refrain from sharing one-time passwords and avoid conducting transactions off authorized brand platforms. Equally important, the guide bridges the gap between technical vigilance and legal empowerment by outlining explicit consumer rights under Indian laws and detailing formal grievance redressal mechanisms. A sustainable defence against online shopping fraud requires an integrated, multi-stakeholder strategy that aligns consumer awareness, corporate accountability and robust law enforcement. E-commerce platforms must continue investing aggressively in advanced artificial intelligence tools to detect cloned websites, eliminate fake merchant accounts and intercept suspicious payment flows before they reach consumers. Concurrently, regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies must strengthen real-time intervention frameworks, expanding initiatives like the 1930 cyber crime helpline and emergency account-freezing protocols to minimize financial damage when breaches happen. On the demand side, continuous public awareness campaigns, modelled after comprehensive handbooks, must reach deep into semi-urban and rural regions where first-time internet users are most susceptible to manipulation. Ultimately, building a safe digital shopping environment is about preserving trust. Only when digital literacy keeps pace with technological innovation can India truly reap the economic rewards of its e-commerce revolution without sacrificing the security of its citizens. (The writer is a former college Principal and Founder of Supporting Shoulders, an Odisha-based non-profit Trust. Views personal.)

Loss Aversion Is Why Your Good Idea Fails

Your upgrade is their loss until you prove otherwise.


Last week, Rahul wrote about a simple truth: you’re not inheriting a business, you’re inheriting an equilibrium. This week, I want to talk about the most common reason that equilibrium fights back even when your idea is genuinely sensible.


Here it is, in plain language:

People don’t oppose improvement. They oppose loss disguised as improvement.

When you step into a legacy MSME, most things are still manual, informal, relationship-driven. People have built their own ways of keeping work moving. It’s not perfect, but it’s familiar. When you introduce a new system, a new rule, a new “professional way,” you may be adding order but you’re also removing something they were using to survive.


And humans react more strongly to removals than additions.


Behavioral economists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky called this loss aversion where we feel losses more sharply than we feel gains. That’s why your promised “future benefit” struggles to compete with someone’s immediate fear.


Which seat are you stepping into?

  • Inherited seat: People assume you’ll change things quickly to “prove yourself”. They brace for loss even before you speak.

  • Hired seat: People watch for hidden agendas: “New boss means new rules, new blame.” They protect themselves.

  • Promoted seat: Your peers worry the old friendship is now replaced by authority. They fear loss of comfort and access.


Different seats, same emotion underneath: don’t take away what keeps me safe.


Weighing Scale

Think of an old kirana shop. The weighing scale may not be fancy, but it’s trusted. The shopkeeper has used it for years. Customers have seen it. Everyone has settled into that comfort.


Now imagine someone walks in and says, “We’re upgrading your weighing scale. This is digital. More accurate. More modern.”

Sounds good, right?

But what does the shopkeeper hear?

  • “My customers might think the old scale was wrong.” (loss of trust)

  • “I won’t be able to adjust for small realities.” (loss of flexibility)

  • “If the digital scale shows something different, I’ll be accused.” (loss of safety)

  • “This was my shop. Now someone else is deciding.” (loss of control)

So even if the new scale is better, the shopkeeper will resist or accept it politely and quietly return to the old one when nobody is watching.

That is exactly what happens in companies.


Modernisation Pitch

Most leaders pitch change like this:

  • “We’ll become world-class.”

  • “We’ll digitize.”

  • “We’ll improve visibility.”

  • “We’ll build a process-driven culture.”


But for the listener, these are not benefits. These are threats, because they translate into losses:

  • Visibility can mean exposure.

  • Process can mean loss of discretion.

  • Digitization can mean loss of speed (at least initially).

  • “Professional” can mean loss of status for the old guard.

So the person across the table is not debating your logic. They’re calculating their losses.


Practical Way

Watch what happens when you propose something simple like daily reporting.

You say: “It’s just 10 minutes. Basic discipline.”

They hear:

  • “Daily reporting means daily scrutiny.”

  • “If numbers dip, I will be questioned.”

  • “If I show the truth, it will create conflict.”

  • “If I don’t show the truth, I’ll be accused later.”

In their mind, the safest response is: nod, agree, delay.

Then you label them “resistant.”

But they’re not resisting change. They’re resisting loss.


Leader’s Job

If you want adoption in an MSME, don’t sell modernization as “upgrade”. Sell it as

protection.

Instead of: “We need an ERP.”

Try: “We need to stop money leakage and order confusion.”

Instead of: “We need systems.”

Try: “We need fewer customer escalations and less rework.”

Instead of: “We need transparency.”

Try: “We need fewer surprises at month-end.”

This is not manipulation. This is translation. You’re speaking the language the system understands: risk, leakage, blame, customer loss, cash loss, fatigue.

Field Test: Rewrite your pitch in loss-prevention language

Pick one change you’re pushing this month. Now write two versions:

Version A (your current pitch):

What you normally say: upgrade, modern, efficiency, best practices.

Version B (loss prevention pitch):

Use this template:

  1. What are we losing today? (money, time, customers, reputation, peace)

  2. Where is the leakage happening? (handoffs, approvals, rework, vendor delays)

  3. What small protection will this change create? (fewer disputes, faster closure, less follow-up)

  4. What will not change? (no layoffs, no humiliation, no sudden policing)

  5. What proof will we show in 2 weeks? (one metric, one visible win)

Now do one more important step:

For your top 3 stakeholders, write the one loss they think they will face if your change happens. Don’t argue with it. Just name it.

Because once you name the fear, you can design around it.


The close

If you remember only one thing from this week, remember this:

A “good idea” is not enough in a legacy MSME. People need to feel safe adopting it.

You don’t have to dilute your standards. You just have to stop selling change like a TED talk and start selling it like a protection plan.

Next week, we’ll deal with another invisible force that keeps companies stuck even when they agree with you:

the status quo isn’t a baseline. It’s a competitor.

(The writer is CEO of PPS Consulting, can be reached at rashmi@ppsconsulting.biz)

 

Comments

bottom of page