As Maharashtra votes on Wednesday, the results on November 23 are poised to shape not just the state’s future, but potentially that of the entire country. This year’s contest is unusual in that it is free from the typical anti-incumbency wave. Over the past five years, all the major political factions in the state have had a turn at governing, meaning no party can credibly claim that the administration has been a failure.
The ruling Mahayuti alliance, led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), is capitalising on its social welfare schemes, which have gained considerable traction among voters. Especially after the alliance’s dismal showing in the Lok Sabha election earlier this year, where the BJP’s seat count plummeted from 23 to just 9, while its partner, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena, managed only seven seats.
The introduction of the Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana, inspired by a similar scheme in Madhya Pradesh, has been a cornerstone of the Mahayuti’s strategy. Under this program, low-income women receive Rs. 1,500 monthly, with a promise to increase the amount to Rs. 2,100 should they retain power. With over 2.5 crore women benefiting, the scheme has found strong support in rural areas, where it has been particularly effective.
The urban electorate has also been a focus for the Mahayuti, with infrastructure projects such as Mumbai’s Coastal Road and the Atal Setu bridge helping to alleviate traffic woes. Moreover, the exemption of small vehicles from tolls in the city has further bolstered their appeal.
Internally, the Mahayuti appears to have resolved its leadership squabbles. While the BJP raised concerns over the candidacy of Nawab Malik, who is embroiled in allegations of financial links with the underworld, the coalition managed to avoid a major fallout. The BJP’s insistence that Malik be excluded from the ticket was rebuffed by Ajit Pawar of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), who feared alienating Muslim voters. Despite some friction, the Mahayuti has generally managed to maintain a united front.
And yet, Ajit Pawar’s refusal to publicly rebuke BJP leaders even in the face of provocations such as Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s controversial remarks about Maharashtra, indicates the pragmatism that defines his political approach. While the rhetoric may be sharp, Pawar’s focus is firmly on consolidating his base and ensuring his party’s success.
Meanwhile, the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA), under the leadership of Sharad Pawar, is hoping to turn the tables. Sharad Pawar, a seasoned strategist, has deftly navigated alliances and candidate selections to maximise his party’s chances of winning a record number of seats. His political acumen was evident in the Lok Sabha election when public sympathy for him surged following BJP leader Narendra Modi’s dismissive comments. The result was a decisive victory for Pawar, with the NCP securing eight of ten seats it contested on.
This time, the BJP has avoided personal attacks on Pawar, and has instead focused its efforts on presenting a united front. With Prime Minister Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, and Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis refraining from inflammatory rhetoric, the BJP seems to have recognised the value of engaging Pawar on more neutral ground.
For Uddhav Thackeray’s Shiv Sena faction, the election is as much about survival as it is about winning. Thackeray, who is still grappling with the fallout from the party’s split and the BJP’s encroachment on his traditional base, has largely focused his campaign on accusing Chief Minister Eknath Shinde of betrayal. Thackeray’s personal focus on portraying himself as a victim, alongside his family members - son Aditya and nephew Varun Sardesai - running for office, has done little to elevate the party’s fortunes.
The Congress, for its part, has found a measure of success in the Vidarbha region, where its campaigns around issues like the defence of India’s constitution have resonated. However, the party struggles to maintain relevance in the rest of the state. Beyond their calls to thwart the construction of the Dharavi redevelopment project by billionaire Gautam Adani, Congress has failed to present a compelling statewide platform, leaving many voters unimpressed.
The Maratha reservation issue, which had stirred significant unrest earlier in the year following Manoj Jarange-Patil’s calls for OBC status, has largely fizzled out. Though Jarange-Patil initially expressed intent to contest the election, he reversed course within a week, further muddying the issue and ensuring it would not emerge as a defining electoral debate.
In the event that Mahayuti emerges victorious, it would provide a stabilising influence for Prime Minister Modi’s government in New Delhi, solidifying the BJP’s hold on Maharashtra. Conversely, should the MVA alliance prevail, it could signal a resurgence of regional parties like the TDP and JDU, potentially shifting the balance of power in Indian politics.
Ultimately, this election will be a bellwether for India’s broader political trajectory, with implications far beyond Maharashtra’s borders. The outcome will reveal whether national politics remains firmly in the grip of the BJP or whether regional forces can once again carve out a dominant role.
Comments