top of page

By:

Pearl Noronha

31 March 2025 at 3:13:45 pm

Selling Goa, Piece by Piece

What nature takes centuries to build can be destroyed in years and once lost, it is rarely recovered. If you think the battle for land belongs to history, think again. In ancient times, kingdoms and nations fought wars over territory because land meant power, survival, wealth and control. That struggle has not disappeared; it has simply changed form. In Goa, the fight for land continues without armies or swords. Today, paperwork, zoning changes, permissions, speculative deals and luxury...

Selling Goa, Piece by Piece

What nature takes centuries to build can be destroyed in years and once lost, it is rarely recovered. If you think the battle for land belongs to history, think again. In ancient times, kingdoms and nations fought wars over territory because land meant power, survival, wealth and control. That struggle has not disappeared; it has simply changed form. In Goa, the fight for land continues without armies or swords. Today, paperwork, zoning changes, permissions, speculative deals and luxury developments have become the new weapons. What was once seized by force is now often taken through approvals, conversions and concrete. Goa has long been both a magnet for conquerors and a refuge for those seeking peace. Across centuries, different cultures have called this land home, drawn not just by its strategic value but also by its seashores, green hills, rivers, flora and fauna. These are not empty stretches of land waiting to be turned into plots. They are part of what makes Goa what it is. At a time when climate stress is no longer a distant concern, such landscapes matter more than ever. Forests, fields, rivers and hills are not disposable spaces, but vital ecological assets that help protect against heat, flooding, erosion and environmental decline. Goa is not the holiday capital of India by accident. Its appeal lies in its small historic homes, low-rise residences, open spaces, green rolling hills and, above all, in the fact that it does not resemble the concrete-heavy urban landscapes many seek to escape. Goa’s charm lies in its difference. Yet that very difference is now under threat. In the name of development, the state is being pushed towards the same model of overbuilding that has diminished so many other places. This may be marketed as progress, but too often it looks more like destruction in slow motion. The real question is whether we are building for the needs of Goa’s people, or for a second-home market driven by wealth, prestige and speculation. Development in Goa should first serve the people who live there. But much of what is being built today seems aimed less at local housing needs and more at a second-home market driven by investment, prestige and short-term rental returns. Many of these homes stay shut for much of the year, existing more as assets than as part of a real community. The ecological cost, however, is constant: land is consumed, trees are cut, concrete spreads, and precious water is drawn into projects that add little to Goa’s daily life. A luxury home that remains locked for most of the year may flatter its owner, but it does not justify the burden it places on the land and resources around it. In recent years, Goa’s much-debated ‘16B conversions’ have come to represent a wider problem: land once valued for its ecological or agricultural role can be rapidly reclassified as real estate. For many residents of Goa, these are not abstract concerns but everyday realities: power cuts, water shortages and the steady inconvenience of weak civic planning. These are not rare disruptions but a routine part of life in far too many areas. Public transport remains sparse and unreliable, while pedestrian infrastructure is so neglected that pavements often feel like an afterthought. In many places, even a short walk can be unsafe, pushing households towards two-wheelers for the most basic errands. If the government is already struggling to provide essential services and safe mobility to existing residents, on what basis does it justify approving developments that place even greater strain on already stretched resources? The government should not treat Goa’s land as something to be sold off in the name of development. Its job is to protect what makes this state worth living in. We are only custodians of this land, not its permanent owners. What we erase in one generation may be impossible for the next to recover. Goa does need to grow and improve, but that growth must respect the limits of its water, its roads, its green spaces and the character that makes it unlike anywhere else. No one is asking for Goa to remain frozen in time. But it should not be turned into another overbuilt city that loses its soul in the process. Goa must become a better Goa, not a poorer version of the places people came here to escape.

Marathwada’s Soybean Squeeze

Updated: Oct 21, 2024

For the Shinde-led Mahayuti government, the soybean crisis in Marathwada should serve as a wake-up call as campaigning intensifies ahead of the crucial Assembly election.

In the drought-prone Marathwada region, soybean, a crucial kharif (monsoon) staple, has faced a serious blow this year as a deadly combination of erratic (and unusually heavy) rainfall and soil degradation has led to dwindling yields for farmers already steeped in debt. The crisis has not only deepened rural distress but also dented the political credibility of the Eknath Shinde-led Mahayuti government in the recently concluded 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

Farmers’ frustration, particularly over the low prices and inadequate support, was reflected in the electoral results. Discontent was not limited to soybean farmers but extended to those growing onions and other crops similarly affected by the erratic weather. The opposition parties capitalized on this anger, contributing to the ruling coalition’s losses in crucial constituencies.

Soybean cultivation is central to Marathwada’s agricultural economy with approximately 60% of the region’s cultivable land dedicated to it. However, this year, the area under cultivation fell sharply by 15%, while the yield per hectare has plummeted by nearly 20% compared to previous years.

Discontent among the rural electorate translated into a significant loss of votes for the Mahayuti coalition in the Lok Sabha election, which had counted on Marathwada as a stronghold. Many farmers switched their allegiance to opposition parties, particularly the Congress and the NCP, viewing the ruling government as ineffective in mitigating the crisis.

While promises of crop insurance and subsidies are being made, the delayed rollout of relief measures is aggravating the situation. Farmers are reporting delayed compensation under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY), India’s crop insurance scheme, which failed to provide timely payouts. To compound the issue, local cooperatives responsible for distributing government aid are being accused of corruption and inefficiency, thereby eroding trust among farmers.

To stem the erosion of its rural voter base, the Shinde government must take decisive action. Strengthening the PMFBY is a critical first step. Insurance payouts need to be streamlined and simplified, ensuring that claims are processed within a few weeks rather than months. The scheme also needs to account for pest attacks and erratic rainfall more accurately, as these are increasingly frequent due to climate change. Enhancing the precision of satellite-based yield assessments would ensure that more farmers receive timely compensation.

Additionally, the government should consider targeted subsidies for soybean growers, particularly for pest-resistant seeds and organic pesticides. A concerted push towards water conservation, particularly through promoting drip irrigation, could help mitigate the impact of future droughts. The state’s ‘Jalyukt Shivar’ campaign, launched in 2015 to boost irrigation in drought-hit regions, could be revitalized, but with greater accountability to ensure funds are utilized effectively.

The state’s past experiments with price stabilization funds, such as the Maharashtra State Agricultural Marketing Board’s attempt to guarantee minimum prices for soybeans, also offer a lesson. While well-intentioned, these initiatives were hampered by poor implementation and market manipulation by intermediaries.

For the Mahayuti government, immediate corrective measures like providing pest-resistant seeds, and reinvigorating irrigation schemes are essential not only to revive the fortunes of the state’s farmers but also to secure the government’s rural support base. Without these, the agrarian distress that continues to plague Maharashtra risks becoming a persistent political liability, as history has repeatedly shown.

(The writer is a farmer and resident of Latur district; views personal)

Comments

bottom of page