top of page

By:

Akhilesh Sinha

25 June 2025 at 2:53:54 pm

Congress-Left Rift Exposes Power Games

New Delhi: Cracks widen in I.N.D.I.A. alliance as Congress and Left clash in Kerala/West Bengal polls, prioritizing state power over ideology. History of flip-flops fuels accusations of cynical opportunism, eroding public trust amid national unity facade.   Ahead of the Kerala and West Bengal assembly elections, cracks have emerged between the Congress and Left parties, with both gearing up to clash head-on in the electoral arena. The echoes of this rift reverberated in a recent meeting of...

Congress-Left Rift Exposes Power Games

New Delhi: Cracks widen in I.N.D.I.A. alliance as Congress and Left clash in Kerala/West Bengal polls, prioritizing state power over ideology. History of flip-flops fuels accusations of cynical opportunism, eroding public trust amid national unity facade.   Ahead of the Kerala and West Bengal assembly elections, cracks have emerged between the Congress and Left parties, with both gearing up to clash head-on in the electoral arena. The echoes of this rift reverberated in a recent meeting of the I.N.D.I.A. alliance's parliamentary parties. The Marxist Communist Party (CPI(M)) openly targeted Congress's biggest leader, Leader of opposition in Parliament Rahul Gandhi, exposing deep tensions. Whether it's the Congress-led I.N.D.I.A. alliance or the earlier United Progressive Alliance (UPA), history shows Congress has always fought elections against CPI(M) in Kerala and West Bengal assembly polls. What kind of political ideology is this, where parties unite for Lok Sabha elections but turn adversaries in state assembly contests?   This naturally begs the question that in this game of alliances, are Congress, the Left, and other I.N.D.I.A. bloc constituents indulging in opportunistic politics driven by a thirst for power? Are they playing tricks on the public just to grab the throne? If their alliances were rooted in ideology, they would stick together from Lok Sabha to assembly elections, united by principle.   Flash point The flashpoint came during an I.N.D.I.A. bloc parliamentary meeting in Kerala, originally called to strategize for the Parliament session and forge a united opposition front against the central government. But the discussion swiftly pivoted to escalating differences between Congress and the Left. CPI(M) MPs took strong exception to Rahul Gandhi's recent statement during a Kerala visit, where he accused central agencies like the Enforcement Directorate (ED) of targeting opposition leaders but sparing Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.   In West Bengal, a senior Congress leader revealed the central leadership's calculus that with little to lose, going solo is the smarter play. Post-alliance breakup with the Left, focus shifts to bolstering vote share, not seat-sharing math. TMC and BJP are expected to dominate anyway. After days of silence, CPI(M) general secretary MA Baby accused Congress of drifting from a broad anti-communal unity, insisting his party favors collaboration with like-minded forces but slamming Congress's stance as isolationist.   The analysis Political analysts warn this split could fragment opposition votes, benefiting TMC. Yet they don't rule out informal grassroots understandings between left and congress. In both states, ditching the alliance lets Congress and the Left campaign comfortably, dodging awkward questions from voters. In Kerala, the Left has held power for two straight terms since 2021, breaking a decades-old pattern of alternating every five years between Left and Congress. Riding an anti-incumbency wave, Congress and Rahul Gandhi now eye a comeback, launching direct attacks on CPI(M). This has irked the Left, whose survival hinges solely on Kerala.   If we look at the political background, the I.N.D.I.A. alliance was formed mainly to create a united strategy against the BJP-led NDA. In several states, opposition parties are trying to contest elections together. Electoral processes, unemployment, inflation, and concerns over constitutional institutions are part of the opposition's shared agenda.   Watching this alliance charade ahead of Lok Sabha and assembly polls, the public is baffled that What's the real basis of these tie-ups? Do parties form and break them for keeping in mind the interests of leaders and parties, or based on ideology? Do they consider the welfare of the people and the nation's interests in doing so? Is coalition politics just opportunism masquerading as strategy? Voters deserve answers-will I.N.D.I.A.'s flip-flops erode trust, or can they justify this as pragmatic realism? Until then, the stench of power hunger lingers.

Missiles from the Mountains

Updated: Jan 6, 2025

Yemen’s Houthis, the last bastion of Iran’s Axis of Resistance, proves a tough nut to crack for Israel.

Yemen’s Houthis

For weeks, Israel’s skies have been pierced by the wail of sirens and the thud of intercepted missiles. The source of this new torment lies not in Gaza or Lebanon but 2,000 kilometers away in Yemen. The Iran-aligned Houthi militant group has escalated its campaign against Israel with ballistic missiles and drones, continuing to strike after the Jewish state’s onslaught has cowed Hezbollah, Tehran’s chief ‘Axis of Resistance’ member.


Where Hamas and Hezbollah have retreated under the weight of Israeli retaliation, the Houthis have stepped into the breach.


The Houthis have long drawn inspiration from Hezbollah, Iran’s foremost proxy in Lebanon. But unlike their Lebanese counterparts, who tempered their militancy with political integration and the trappings of normal life, the Houthis remain ideologically unyielding. For them, martyrdom is not a last resort but a calling. The group’s apocalyptic mantra – ‘Death to America, death to Israel, curse upon the Jews, victory to Islam’ - underscores their extremist ethos.


Unlike Hezbollah, the Houthis operate from the remote and rugged terrain of Yemen’s northwest, far removed from the reach of Israeli airstrikes. This geographic distance, combined with Israel’s limited intelligence on Yemeni targets, has made the group a uniquely elusive and persistent threat. Their arsenal, which now includes long-range ‘Palestine’ ballistic missiles, capable of reaching Israel, showcases their technological evolution under Iranian tutelage.


The Houthis’ rise as a major player in the Axis of Resistance is a testament to Iran’s strategy of fostering non-state actors as instruments of regional influence. From the 1990s, Tehran began providing the Houthis with military and ideological support, shaping them into a force capable of challenging Sunni dominance in Yemen and beyond. The late Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force, was instrumental in integrating the Houthis into Iran’s broader network of proxies.


The Houthis’ reliance on Iranian weapons is well-documented. Despite Tehran’s denials, intercepted shipments of missile components and drone parts tell a different story. This support has transformed the Houthis from a ragtag insurgency reliant on crude rockets into a sophisticated force capable of launching hypersonic missiles and deploying advanced drones.


The Houthis’ ascendancy is also a product of Yemen’s grim realities. Years of civil war have devastated the country, leaving over 18 million people in need of urgent aid and creating fertile ground for recruitment. For many Yemeni families, enlisting children in Houthi ranks is seen as a means of survival.


The group’s ability to exploit Yemen’s humanitarian disaster has made them resilient. International attempts to weaken them — whether through sanctions, military intervention or economic isolation —have largely failed. The Houthis have weaponized their suffering, framing their resistance as a moral and religious obligation against what they portray as Western and Israeli oppression.


The Houthis are not just Israel’s problem. Their control over Yemen’s Red Sea coastline and proximity to vital maritime routes have allowed them to disrupt global commerce. Their escalation against Israel marks a new phase in their ambitions. By targeting the Jewish state, the Houthis are aligning themselves more closely with the Palestinian cause.


Israel faces a difficult choice in addressing the Houthi threat. Direct military intervention in Yemen is fraught with challenges, from logistical hurdles to the risk of entanglement in another protracted conflict. The Houthis’ ideological fervour and willingness to endure hardship make them an especially intractable foe.


The group’s extremism, coupled with their geographic remoteness, presents a unique strategic dilemma. Unlike Hamas or Hezbollah, the Houthis are insulated from immediate Israeli pressure due to their operational base in Yemen. While Hezbollah and Hamas may currently be subdued, their Yemeni counterparts are proving that Iran’s proxy network remains robust and adaptable. The Houthis have filled a void, not just in the Axis of Resistance but also in the broader landscape of Middle Eastern militancy.

Comments


bottom of page