top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city...

Seventy-six mayors ruled BMC since 1931

After four years, Mumbai to salute its first citizen Kishori Pednekar Vishwanath Mahadeshwar Snehal Ambekar Sunil Prabhu Mumbai: As the date for appointing Mumbai’s First Citizen looms closer, various political parties have adopted tough posturing to foist their own person for the coveted post of Mayor – the ‘face’ of the country’s commercial capital. Ruling Mahayuti allies Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Shiv Sena have vowed that the city will get a ‘Hindu Marathi’ person to head India’s richest civic body, while the Opposition Shiv Sena (UBT)-Maharashtra Navnirman Sena also harbour fond hopes of a miracle that could ensure their own person for the post. The Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) optimism stems from expectations of possible political permutations-combinations that could develop with a realignment of forces as the Supreme Court is hearing the cases involving the Shiv Sena-Nationalist Congress Party this week. Catapulted as the largest single party, the BJP hopes to install a first ever party-man as Mayor, but that may not create history. Way back in 1982-1983, a BJP leader Dr. Prabhakar Pai had served in the top post in Mumbai (then Bombay). Incidentally, Dr. Pai hailed from Udupi district of Karnataka, and his appointment came barely a couple of years after the BJP was formed (1980), capping a distinguished career as a city father, said experts. Originally a Congressman, Dr. Pai later shifted to the Bharatiya Janata Party, then back to Congress briefly, founded the Janata Seva Sangh before immersing himself in social activities. Second Administrator The 2026 Mayoral elections have evoked huge interest not only among Mumbaikars but across the country as it comes after nearly four years since the BMC was governed by an Administrator. This was only the second time in the BMC history that an Administrator was named after April 1984-May 1985. On both occasions, there were election-related issues, the first time the elections got delayed for certain reasons and the second time the polling was put off owing to Ward delimitations and OBC quotas as the matter was pending in the courts. From 1931 till 2022, Mumbai has been lorded over by 76 Mayors, men and women, hailing from various regions, backgrounds, castes and communities. They included Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Parsis, Sikhs, even a Jew, etc., truly reflecting the cosmopolitan personality of the coastal city and India’s financial powerhouse. In 1931-1932, the Mayor was a Parsi, J. B. Boman Behram, and others from his community followed like Khurshed Framji Nariman (after whom Nariman Point is named), E. A. Bandukwala, Minoo Masani, B. N. Karanjia and other bigwigs. There were Muslims like Hoosenally Rahimtoola, Sultan M. Chinoy, the legendary Yusuf Meherally, Dr. A. U. Memon and others. The Christian community got a fair share of Mayors with Joseph A. D’Souza – who was Member of Constituent Assembly representing Bombay Province for writing-approving the Constitution of India, M. U. Mascarenhas, P. A. Dias, Simon C. Fernandes, J. Leon D’Souza, et al. A Jew Elijah Moses (1937-1938) and a Sikh M. H. Bedi (1983-1984), served as Mayors, but post-1985, for the past 40 years, nobody from any minority community occupied the august post. During the silver jubilee year of the post, Sulochana M. Modi became the first woman Mayor of Mumbai (1956), and later with tweaks in the rules, many women ruled in this post – Nirmala Samant-Prabhavalkar (1994-1995), Vishakha Raut (997-1998), Dr. Shubha Raul (March 2007-Nov. 2009), Shraddha Jadhav (Dec. 2009-March 2012), Snehal Ambedkar (Sep. 2014-March 2017). The last incumbent (before the Administrator) was a government nurse, Kishori Pednekar (Nov. 2019-March 2022) - who earned the sobriquet of ‘Florence Nightingale’ of Mumbai - as she flitted around in her full white uniform at the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic, earning the admiration of the citizens. Mumbai Mayor – high-profile post The Mumbai Mayor’s post is considered a crucial step in the political ladder and many went on to become MLAs, MPs, state-central ministers, a Lok Sabha Speaker, Chief Ministers and union ministers. The formidable S. K. Patil was Mayor (1949-1952) and later served in the union cabinets of PMs Jawaharlal Nehru, Lah Bahadur Shastri and Indira Gandhi; Dahyabhai V. Patel (1954-1955) was the son of India’s first Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel; Manohar Joshi (1976-1977) became the CM of Maharashtra, later union minister and Speaker of Lok Sabha; Chhagan Bhujbal (1985-1986 – 1990-1991) became a Deputy CM.

Missiles in Motion

Updated: Jan 27, 2025

The U.S. expands its missile presence in the Indo-Pacific, drawing China’s ire and reshaping its military footprint in the Philippines.

Philippines

In a significant move that highlights both the growing strategic importance of the Philippines and the heightened tensions in the Indo-Pacific, the United States has shifted its Typhon missile launchers from Laoag airfield on the northern island of Luzon to an undisclosed location in the same region. The Typhon system, capable of launching both Tomahawk cruise missiles and SM-6 anti-air and anti-ship missiles, is part of a broader U.S. initiative to strengthen its military presence in Asia amid intensifying competition with China. While the relocation’s full implications remain uncertain, the move is a stark reminder of how the Philippines, a longtime U.S. ally, has become a crucial military base for American forces, strategically positioned in one of the world’s most volatile regions.


The Philippines, which has hosted U.S. military bases since the end of the Spanish-American War in 1898, has long served as a pivotal point for American military power in the region. During the Cold War, U.S. bases such as Subic Bay and Clark Air Base were integral to projecting American influence throughout Southeast Asia. After the bases were closed in 1991, following the Philippine Senate’s vote to oust U.S. forces, the relationship between the two nations evolved into a more informal yet still robust military alliance. This transformation has included the enhanced cooperation envisioned under the 1998 Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) and the 2014 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), which have allowed U.S. troops to rotate through Philippine territory for joint exercises and humanitarian missions.


Today, the renewed military cooperation has become more explicit, with the Philippines providing the U.S. access to strategic locations on its territory, such as the airfields in Luzon. These sites now play a key role in U.S. military deployments, particularly as the Pentagon focuses on countering China’s growing military and economic assertiveness. The Typhon system’s relocation is a testament to how this partnership is evolving. With its ability to strike targets across China and Russia, the Typhon launchers position the Philippines as a key player in the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy, especially as the region becomes the central theater of global geopolitical competition.


The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) has clarified that the Typhon system’s new position within the Philippines is part of a broader strategy to enhance mobility and survivability in a potential conflict. The Typhon batteries are designed to be easily redeployed, ensuring that they can move swiftly to evade enemy targeting. This flexibility, particularly in a region where the U.S. faces formidable opponents like China and Russia, is seen as a force multiplier. With satellite images revealing the movement of the missile batteries, it is clear that U.S. military officials are working to maximize the strategic value of the Philippines without necessarily making a permanent commitment of forces.


However, the relocation has sparked strong reactions from both China and Russia, who view the U.S. missile systems as an escalation that could destabilize the region further. The Typhon’s potential range, combined with the firepower of its Tomahawk and SM-6 missiles, puts significant pressure on Beijing and Moscow, both of which are keenly aware of the U.S. military’s ability to project power within the first and second island chains—an area that includes the Philippines. The Chinese government has consistently condemned the U.S. missile deployments, accusing Washington of stoking an arms race and inflaming tensions in the South China Sea, a waterway through which crucial international shipping routes pass.


This missile race is part of a broader shift in military dynamics in the Indo-Pacific. The region has seen an accelerated arms buildup, particularly by China, which has rapidly developed anti-ship ballistic missiles, hypersonic weapons and an expanding naval fleet. As China asserts its territorial claims over the South China Sea and extends its military presence across the region, the United States is looking to ensure that its military capabilities in the area remain competitive. The relocation of the Typhon systems is, in many ways, a direct response to these Chinese advancements, ensuring that the U.S. maintains its ability to challenge Beijing’s dominance in the region.

Comments


bottom of page