top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Missiles in Motion

Updated: Jan 27, 2025

The U.S. expands its missile presence in the Indo-Pacific, drawing China’s ire and reshaping its military footprint in the Philippines.

Philippines

In a significant move that highlights both the growing strategic importance of the Philippines and the heightened tensions in the Indo-Pacific, the United States has shifted its Typhon missile launchers from Laoag airfield on the northern island of Luzon to an undisclosed location in the same region. The Typhon system, capable of launching both Tomahawk cruise missiles and SM-6 anti-air and anti-ship missiles, is part of a broader U.S. initiative to strengthen its military presence in Asia amid intensifying competition with China. While the relocation’s full implications remain uncertain, the move is a stark reminder of how the Philippines, a longtime U.S. ally, has become a crucial military base for American forces, strategically positioned in one of the world’s most volatile regions.


The Philippines, which has hosted U.S. military bases since the end of the Spanish-American War in 1898, has long served as a pivotal point for American military power in the region. During the Cold War, U.S. bases such as Subic Bay and Clark Air Base were integral to projecting American influence throughout Southeast Asia. After the bases were closed in 1991, following the Philippine Senate’s vote to oust U.S. forces, the relationship between the two nations evolved into a more informal yet still robust military alliance. This transformation has included the enhanced cooperation envisioned under the 1998 Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) and the 2014 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), which have allowed U.S. troops to rotate through Philippine territory for joint exercises and humanitarian missions.


Today, the renewed military cooperation has become more explicit, with the Philippines providing the U.S. access to strategic locations on its territory, such as the airfields in Luzon. These sites now play a key role in U.S. military deployments, particularly as the Pentagon focuses on countering China’s growing military and economic assertiveness. The Typhon system’s relocation is a testament to how this partnership is evolving. With its ability to strike targets across China and Russia, the Typhon launchers position the Philippines as a key player in the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy, especially as the region becomes the central theater of global geopolitical competition.


The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) has clarified that the Typhon system’s new position within the Philippines is part of a broader strategy to enhance mobility and survivability in a potential conflict. The Typhon batteries are designed to be easily redeployed, ensuring that they can move swiftly to evade enemy targeting. This flexibility, particularly in a region where the U.S. faces formidable opponents like China and Russia, is seen as a force multiplier. With satellite images revealing the movement of the missile batteries, it is clear that U.S. military officials are working to maximize the strategic value of the Philippines without necessarily making a permanent commitment of forces.


However, the relocation has sparked strong reactions from both China and Russia, who view the U.S. missile systems as an escalation that could destabilize the region further. The Typhon’s potential range, combined with the firepower of its Tomahawk and SM-6 missiles, puts significant pressure on Beijing and Moscow, both of which are keenly aware of the U.S. military’s ability to project power within the first and second island chains—an area that includes the Philippines. The Chinese government has consistently condemned the U.S. missile deployments, accusing Washington of stoking an arms race and inflaming tensions in the South China Sea, a waterway through which crucial international shipping routes pass.


This missile race is part of a broader shift in military dynamics in the Indo-Pacific. The region has seen an accelerated arms buildup, particularly by China, which has rapidly developed anti-ship ballistic missiles, hypersonic weapons and an expanding naval fleet. As China asserts its territorial claims over the South China Sea and extends its military presence across the region, the United States is looking to ensure that its military capabilities in the area remain competitive. The relocation of the Typhon systems is, in many ways, a direct response to these Chinese advancements, ensuring that the U.S. maintains its ability to challenge Beijing’s dominance in the region.

Comments


bottom of page