top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Moral Collapse


Few stories lay bare the moral rot in India’s local institutions as starkly as the death of a 29-year-old government doctor in Satara. She was found hanging last week in her hotel room in Phaltan in western Maharashtra. Days later, it emerged that she had accused a police officer of rape, another of harassment, and a local member of parliament of pressuring her to falsify medical reports. In her final weeks, she wrote letters, filed complaints, and even an RTI application seeking accountability. No one listened. When she warned that if anything happened to her, the police would be responsible, the state looked the other way.


Her story exposes a grim intersection of gender, power and impunity. The young medical officer had been locked in a protracted conflict with the Phaltan police. She had refused to sign off on ‘fit for custody’ certificates for accused individuals with visible health complications. This act of integrity, instead of earning her protection, invited vengeance. The police counter-accused her of dereliction, alleging that she deliberately delayed arrests by declaring suspects medically unfit. The standoff escalated into intimidation. When her June complaint was ignored, she filed an RTI in August, a desperate attempt to pierce the bureaucratic wall of silence.


By then, her life had begun to unravel. A four-page statement she submitted to a departmental inquiry in August catalogued the harassment she faced. It included chilling details: a police sub-inspector, she alleged, had raped her more than once; others had threatened her for resisting their demands. Worse still, she claimed that a parliamentarian’s aide had called, accusing her of ‘favouring’ the accused because she hailed from Beed district – a slur that reeked of misogyny, caste prejudice and provincial bigotry. The MP, she wrote, berated her over the phone for “not issuing certificates as desired by the police.”


Instead of shielded her, her superiors issued reminders about her ‘availability 24×7.’ The very institutions meant to enforce law and preserve life had turned on their own employee.


Her suicide note is an indictment not merely of individuals but of a system that failed to respond to warning after warning.


The Satara tragedy recalls a pattern too familiar in India’s governance culture: whistleblowers abandoned, victims of sexual violence disbelieved, and lower-rank officials crushed between political patronage and bureaucratic inertia. Each complaint she filed was a test of the system’s conscience. Each unanswered letter was a failure of that conscience. Her death is not a mystery to be solved but a mirror held up to the apathy that corrodes institutions from within.


Justice, when and if it comes, must extend beyond the perfunctory arrests or suspensions. It must ask why a doctor had to fight alone against a network of police, politicians, and administrators. Until those questions are answered, every promise of reform will ring hollow and every government doctor in India’s hinterland will know how little the state values courage or life.

Comments


bottom of page