top of page

By:

Amol Deshmukh and Vaibhav Mathkari

5 March 2025 at 11:13:08 pm

Can Maharashtra’s Food Industry Take Civic Responsibility?

The food industry can turn everyday business practices into everyday civic action. AI generated image We all love eating out. Maharashtra’s food culture is inseparable from its identity. From a small vada pav stall to a five-star hotel, and from a family restaurant to a large wedding caterer, food businesses are part of everyday life. What responsibility does a food business have towards the citizen? Is serving tasty food enough? Or should restaurants also minimise food and plastic waste,...

Can Maharashtra’s Food Industry Take Civic Responsibility?

The food industry can turn everyday business practices into everyday civic action. AI generated image We all love eating out. Maharashtra’s food culture is inseparable from its identity. From a small vada pav stall to a five-star hotel, and from a family restaurant to a large wedding caterer, food businesses are part of everyday life. What responsibility does a food business have towards the citizen? Is serving tasty food enough? Or should restaurants also minimise food and plastic waste, maintain clean kitchens, use safe ingredients, manage waste responsibly and avoid traffic problems outside their premises? Several countries are already asking these questions. Japan has made reducing food loss a national priority, bringing businesses, government agencies and citizens together to prevent usable food from becoming waste. France has taken steps to reduce single-use plastics, including plastic drinking-water bottles in collective catering. Singapore requires large commercial premises to segregate and manage food waste. The European Union is also working to reduce unnecessary single-use plastics and promote circular packaging. Maharashtra need not copy them. But they offer one lesson: civic responsibility cannot rest with the government alone. The food industry has a major role to play. What if Maharashtra took up an 11-point challenge? Imagine major hotels, restaurants, caterers and food establishments voluntarily adopting a civic charter. First, reduce food waste. Large kitchens should track daily waste and aim to cut it by 25 per cent and then 50 per cent. Food safe for consumption should, wherever possible and legally appropriate, be redirected for human consumption. The rest should go for composting, biogas or other scientific treatment. Second, reduce unnecessary plastic water bottles. If safe drinking water is available, why automatically give every customer a plastic bottle? Maharashtra can develop a model using glass, steel and refill systems. Third, rethink packaging. Food delivery has created mountains of packaging. Do we really need all this plastic? Reusable, recyclable and genuinely sustainable alternatives should be preferred. Fourth, end open dumping of food waste. Restaurants should not send organic waste to roadside dumping points. Segregation and treatment should be part of commercial food-waste management. Fifth, make healthy choices available. Menus should include lower-salt, lower-sugar and nutritionally balanced options. This is about choice, not telling people what to eat. Sixth, use cooking oil responsibly. Restaurants should record its use and replacement and ensure used oil goes through authorised channels. Food safety and environmental responsibility should go together. Seventh, make kitchen hygiene a culture, not a certificate. The World Health Organization’s principles are simple: keep clean; separate raw and cooked food; cook properly; maintain safe temperatures; and use safe water and raw materials. The challenge is making them daily habits. Eighth, give consumers a voice. A QR code could allow customers to report serious food-safety concerns through a system that records and follows up complaints. Ninth, use technology intelligently. Artificial intelligence, sensors and digital systems can monitor temperature, hygiene schedules, waste segregation and other safety parameters. Tenth, think beyond the kitchen. If customers block footpaths, roads or emergency entrances, restaurants should help manage the situation. A successful restaurant should not become a problem for its neighbourhood. Finally, the Safe Food Oath. Can Maharashtra’s food industry voluntarily pledge that no known unsafe substance will knowingly be used in food? The proposed oath could state: “We pledge that we shall not knowingly use any carcinogenic, teratogenic, hepatotoxic, nephrotoxic or allergenic substance as a colouring agent, flavour or taste enhancer, adulterant, sweetener, or preservative or for any other food-processing purpose. We shall use only legally permitted and scientifically evaluated ingredients and additives and maintain transparency and accountability in the preparation and serving of food.” This is not a call to ban every chemical or synthetic food additive. Many are legally permitted after safety evaluation. The point is simple: unsafe substances should never be shortcuts for making food cheaper, brighter, sweeter or more attractive. Civic Food Industry Award Maharashtra could take the idea further by inviting the food and hospitality industry to adopt an 11-point Civic Food Industry Charter. Those meeting the standards could be independently assessed and recognised through a Maharashtra Civic Food Industry Award. The award would ask not only, “How good is your food?” But also, how much food did you save? How much plastic did you eliminate? How safely do you manage your kitchen? What happens to your food waste? Are your ingredients safe? Do you respect the neighbourhood? That would give “hospitality” a deeper meaning. Maharashtra has the institutions, entrepreneurs, technology and, most importantly, a food industry large enough to make a difference. The government can make regulations. Citizens can demand better standards. But the food industry can lead by choice. So the question before Maharashtra’s hotels, restaurants, caterers and food businesses is simple: Are you ready to accept the challenge — not just to serve citizens, but to take responsibility for them? (Deshmukh is a forensics scientist. Mathkari is co-founder, Civic Engineering Foundation.)

Quiet Triumph

In India’s hyperventilating political discourse, foreign policy has increasingly been reduced to a morality play. The latest performance of the Opposition Congress came after the United States and Israel launched strikes against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Congress leaders and a familiar chorus of self-appointed foreign-policy sages and a media ecosystem sympathetic to the party promptly accused the Modi government of ‘silence.’ According to them, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, by choosing to allegedly remain ‘silent’ on the US-Israel strikes on Iran, has damaged the country’s relations with Tehran.


Reality, however, has an inconvenient way of puncturing such narratives. Even as the critics fumed, India’s External Affairs Minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar spoke to his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi.


Soon afterwards, Iran allowed two India-flagged oil tankers - Pushpak and Parimal - to pass safely through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow maritime artery through which a substantial share of the world’s oil supply flows. At a moment when Tehran has tightened its grip on the strait and attacked several vessels amid its confrontation with the United States and Israel, this clearance is no small diplomatic accomplishment. Nor was it an isolated incident. A Liberian-flagged crude tanker, Shenlong Suezmax, captained by an Indian and carrying oil from Saudi Arabia’s Ras Tanura port, also safely completed its passage through the strait before docking in Mumbai.


Following the same diplomatic engagement, Tehran has also opened its land borders for Indian nationals wishing to exit the country by allowing them to cross through any checkpoint with nothing more than a passport. This concession is striking as it is a privilege extended to no other nationality during the ongoing crisis.


The Indian government’s pragmatic approach reflects a basic geopolitical reality. New Delhi maintains strong ties with both Israel and Iran, adversaries locked in a bitter strategic rivalry over West Asia. Israel supplies advanced defence technology and intelligence cooperation. Iran provides energy resources and sits astride a region crucial to India’s economic security. Choosing sides in such a conflict is not just reckless but goes against fundamental geopolitical logic. Critics from within the country who demand that India loudly denounce one side ought to behave more responsibly, at the very least. A rising power cannot afford ideological rigidity. It must engage multiple partners simultaneously while protecting its national interests. This balancing act, often described as ‘strategic autonomy,’ has been the hallmark of India’s external policy in recent years. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints. Roughly a fifth of global oil shipments pass through it. For India, the world’s third-largest consumer of crude, any disruption there would have immediate economic consequences. Rising tensions in the Gulf have already rattled energy markets and forced countries to rethink supply chains.


Under such circumstances, the task of Indian diplomacy is not to indulge ideological theatrics. It is to keep the oil flowing and our citizens safe. This is precisely what New Delhi has done.

Comments

bottom of page