top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

‘Bharat Ratna to Savarkar will increase its prestige’

Mumbai: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday threw his full weight behind the long-standing demand to confer the Bharat Ratna on Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, asserting that the Hindutva ideologue’s inclusion would enhance the dignity of the country’s highest civilian honour. Bhagwat, who explained the genesis and growth of the RSS over past 100 years in two lectures at the Nehru Centre here on Saturday and Sunday, replied to several...

‘Bharat Ratna to Savarkar will increase its prestige’

Mumbai: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday threw his full weight behind the long-standing demand to confer the Bharat Ratna on Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, asserting that the Hindutva ideologue’s inclusion would enhance the dignity of the country’s highest civilian honour. Bhagwat, who explained the genesis and growth of the RSS over past 100 years in two lectures at the Nehru Centre here on Saturday and Sunday, replied to several questions. While replying to one of the questions, he remarked, “If Swatantraveer Savarkar is given the Bharat Ratna, the prestige of the Bharat Ratna itself will increase.” He was asked, why there has been a delay in conferring the Bharat Ratna on Savarkar, in reply to which, Bhagwat said, “I am not part of that committee. But if I meet someone, I will ask. Even without that honour, he rules the hearts of millions of people.” he added. Social Divisions Bhagwat replied to questions that were clubbed in 14 different groups ranging from national security to environment, social harmony, youth, arts and sports. Whenever the questions suggested or expressed expectations that the RSS should do certain things, Bhagwat stressed on the involvement of the society and initiative from the society in resolving the problems. While addressing the critical issue of Uniform Civil Code, Bhagwat stated that the UCC should be framed by taking everyone into confidence and must not lead to social divisions. In the same way while replying to the question related to illegal migrants in the country, Bhagwat urged people to “detect and report” the “illegal infiltrators” to the police. He also urged people not to give them any employment and to be more “vigilant.” Backing SIR He highlighted that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise has already revealed the “foreigners” living in the country. “The government has a lot to do regarding infiltration. They have to detect and deport. This wasn’t happening until now, but it has started little by little, and it will gradually increase. When the census or the SIR is conducted, many people come to light who are not citizens of this country; they are automatically excluded from the process,” he said. “But we can do one thing: we can work on detection. Their language gives them away. We should detect them and report them to the appropriate authorities. We should inform the police that we suspect these people are foreigners, and they should investigate and keep an eye on them, and we will also keep an eye on them. We will not give employment to any foreigner. If someone is from our country, we will give them employment, but not to foreigners. You should be a little more vigilant and aware,” he added. SC Chief Emphasising the inclusivity of the Sangh, he said that anyone can become ‘Sarsanghchalak’ (RSS chief), including the SC and STs, as the decision is solely dependent on the work that any individual put for the organisation. “Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shudra or Brahmin does not qualify for the Sarsanghchalak position (RSS Chief), a Hindu will become the one who works and is best available. A Hindu will become, and that can also be an SC or ST. Anyone can become it depends on the work. Today, if you see, all classes have representation in the Sangh. The decision is taken on the basis of one who works and is best available,” he said. He pointed out that when the RSS was founded, its work began in a Brahmin-dominated community and hence, most of its founders were Brahmins, which led to the organisation being labelled as a Brahmin outfit at the time. People always look for an organisation that has representatives from their community, he said. “If I were to choose a chief, I would go by the ‘best available candidate’ criterion. When I was appointed RSS chief, there were many best candidates, but they were not available. I was the one who could be relieved from duties and appointed,” he said. He said that to belong to the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe communities is not a disqualification, and neither is being a Brahmin a qualification to become the RSS chief. Ready to step down if Sangh asks for Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday said the Sangh had asked him to continue working despite his age, while stressing that he would step down from the post whenever the organisation directs him to do so. “There is no election to the post of RSS chief. Regional and divisional heads appoint the chief. Generally, it is said that after turning 75, one should work without holding any post,” Bhagwat said. “I have completed 75 years and informed the RSS, but the organisation asked me to continue working. Whenever the RSS asks me to step down, I will do so, but retirement from work will never happen,” he said.

Mr. Bond, Your Slip is Showing

Britain may cheer its first female MI6 chief, but Indian women have long been shattering glass ceilings without the fanfare.

Arundhati Bhattacharya
Arundhati Bhattacharya

For the first time in its 116-year history, MI6 will be headed by a woman. Britain is celebrating. It has taken them over a century to prove that women are capable of more than just being Bond girls. For me, the news brought a sense of vindication. As a teenager in the 1970s, I never warmed to Bond movies. Women were portrayed as pretty distractions, meant either to entrap or entertain Mr. James Bond. The other token female in the films was hardly better: she handed him gadgets and arms, playing the support act all along. The core detective work, the glamour, the glory—those were always Bond’s domain. Well, Agent 007, today the job belongs to a woman.


And not just any job. Running MI6 requires strategic depth, discretion, and the ability to operate in the murkiest geopolitical swamps. It is arguably Britain’s most secretive and high-stakes role—hardly a backdrop for a Bond girl in a backless gown. Blaise Metreweli, the first female chief of MI6, got to the top because she stuck to her work. That is the real secret.


When women persevere in their chosen paths, they rise. Too many, however, opt out unlike men. I explored the reasons in my first book, Have the Women Left Venus? Decoding Gender @Workplace. The biggest disservice women do to themselves is dropping out—not necessarily because of patriarchy, but because of belief. And the consequences are visible.


From a nationalist standpoint, Indian women have quietly been scaling barriers for years. The world’s first woman to head a public sector bank was Arundhati Bhattacharya, an Indian. No mean feat given banking is generally a standard marker of intelligence. Kalpana Chawla, who journeyed to space in 1997, did so as the first woman of Indian origin, and paid the ultimate price in the Columbia disaster.


While Chawla fortunately lingers on in popular memory, the names of top scientists and engineers like Ritu Karidhal and Muthayya Vanitha, who played pivotal roles in India’s Mars and lunar missions, barely register beyond a fleeting news mention. Recently, India’s President, Droupadi Murmu, appointed a female aide-de-camp. Long before their Western counterparts, Indian women were flying planes and leading entire cockpit crews. They have been launching space missions and piloting them too. In 2017, an all-women Navy crew circumnavigated the globe in the INSV Tarini by battling storms, isolation and doubt. These are not token gestures but unique triumphs.


But these feats vanish from the news cycle as fast as they appear. And women rarely raise a fuss. The silence is both learned and internalised. Too often, women are conditioned to underplay success, lest they seem boastful.


I find the financial press particularly culpable. Women achievers barely make the cut. At a recent conference, when I challenged an editorial head on this count, his response was telling. “Women only want to read about shopping.” Really? Is that what we believe women care about?


I have lived in the economic world. I chose a corporate career at a time when the stereotype said pretty girls belonged either on runways or in airline cabins. I religiously began reading The Economic Times at 14, and I still do. But little has changed. Back then, stories about women were filed under ‘empowerment.’ Today they appear under ‘diversity.’ When, exactly, will women be part of the mainstream? I am the mainstream. Why is news about women still not treated as such?


I don’t care about Metreweli’s marital status. Whatever it is, she got here by overcoming the odds. But in India’s private corporate sector, such facts change everything. As a hiring professional, I see how married women are treated. They are dodged like a liability, on the assumption that they aren’t fully available for the job. That myth, however, collapsed when I was researching and doing interviews for my second book, The Shattered Ceiling. The women who reached the top did so not because of the assumptions about them, but despite them.


So, women, voice your demands. Say what YOU want. Speak out about what you expect to see, feel, and be. Our reality will not change unless our expectations are made visible. I am done being a diversity number. I am mainstream.


Treat me like one!


(The writer is an award-winning author, hiring expert and an emotional intelligence and diversity trainer.)

Comments


bottom of page