top of page

By:

Sumant Vidwans

29 August 2024 at 10:09:28 am

The Rising Tide: China’s Tightening Grip on Solomon Islands

China’s quiet rise in Oceania is reshaping Pacific geopolitics, and the Solomon Islands now sit at the centre of this strategic contest. While the South China Sea dominates debate over China’s maritime expansion, China’s quieter but significant rise in Oceania is generating growing geopolitical and security concerns. The Solomon Islands exemplify this shift, emerging as a key arena of competition between China and traditional Western allies. Beijing’s push for deeper security and economic...

The Rising Tide: China’s Tightening Grip on Solomon Islands

China’s quiet rise in Oceania is reshaping Pacific geopolitics, and the Solomon Islands now sit at the centre of this strategic contest. While the South China Sea dominates debate over China’s maritime expansion, China’s quieter but significant rise in Oceania is generating growing geopolitical and security concerns. The Solomon Islands exemplify this shift, emerging as a key arena of competition between China and traditional Western allies. Beijing’s push for deeper security and economic ties signals a strategic move into a region long shaped by Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. The Solomon Islands is an archipelago nation in Oceania, northeast of Australia. It consists of six main islands and over a thousand smaller ones, covering about 29,000 sq km and home to roughly 700,000 people. Honiara, the capital and largest city, sits on the island of Guadalcanal. Modern Solomon Islands history began in 1893, when Captain Herbert Gibson declared a British protectorate. The islands later became a major World War II battleground, seeing fierce clashes between the US, Britain, and Japan. In 1975, the territory was renamed “The Solomon Islands”, gaining self-governance the following year. It became fully independent in 1978 as the Solomon Islands”. The country remains a constitutional monarchy within the Commonwealth, with the British monarch as head of state, represented by a governor-general. China’s growing influence After gaining independence in 1978, the Solomon Islands established ties with Taiwan in 1983 and maintained them for 36 years. Taiwan provided extensive aid in infrastructure, education, and healthcare. But as China’s influence expanded, the Solomons eventually shifted under pressure from Beijing’s One-China policy, which requires countries to recognise only the PRC and reject Taiwan’s claim to statehood. In 2019, the Solomon Islands cut diplomatic ties with Taiwan and recognised China, aligning with a broader regional shift in the Pacific. Soon after, the Solomons signed an MoU with China, joining the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Launched in 2013, the BRI is a vast global infrastructure and economic project aimed at boosting trade and connectivity across Asia, Africa, and Europe. The Solomon Islands’ economy depends largely on agriculture, fishing, and forestry, with little industrialisation. Its BRI partnership with China prioritises infrastructure, including upgrades to Honiara’s port, major road improvements, and new sports facilities such as the $119 million national stadium. Cooperation also extends to Chinese language training, scholarships, and government capacity-building programmes. Since switching diplomatic ties, Solomon Islands officials have been visiting China almost monthly on “study tours”. Chinese provincial governments are also building links with Solomon Islands’ provinces, while universities on both sides are signing agreements to set up joint R&D centres. The concerns While the BRI has spurred major infrastructure growth, it has also raised concerns about long-term financial sustainability. A key worry is “debt-trap diplomacy”, where repayment pressures could threaten the Solomons’ control over key assets, as seen in countries like Sri Lanka. The islands also export most of their timber and natural resources to China, deepening economic dependence on the Chinese market. Concerns over China’s influence extend beyond trade and infrastructure. In 2022, the Solomons and China signed a security cooperation pact—initially kept secret—which alarmed Western allies over the possibility of a future Chinese military presence. These concerns soon proved justified. In January 2022, a PLA Air Force aircraft carrying riot gear and security personnel in camouflage landed in Honiara. This deployment, known as the China Public Security Bureau–Solomon Islands Policing Advisory Group (CPAG), has since become a permanent presence. China’s police maintain a 12-member presence on six-month rotations, operating across all provinces. There have also been reports of Beijing influencing local media, and recent international coverage has highlighted China’s role in the Solomons’ domestic politics, including during a no-confidence motion. The alternatives For the Solomon Islands, ties with China offer both opportunities and challenges. While the former Sogavare government leaned strongly toward Beijing, the current administration under Jeremiah Manele is trying to balance relations with both the US and China as the two powers compete for influence. The country is also trying to broaden partnerships with Australia, New Zealand, and others. Manele has repeatedly signalled a preference for partners like New Zealand on major projects such as the Bina Harbour development. But New Zealand cannot fund the project alone, and its attempts to secure additional donors have so far failed — leaving China eager to step in. This is just one example of how smaller nations, unable to attract Western support, often end up turning to China and risking deeper dependence or debt. In the crucial Pacific Ocean region, the Solomon Islands exemplify smaller nations caught between the geopolitical rivalry of the US and China. (The writer is a foreign affairs expert. Views personal.)

Mumbai’s Infrastructure Push: Progress or Pain?

While grand projects promise relief, poor planning leaves commuters stuck in chaos.

ree

Bollywood has long serenaded Mumbai as the city of dreams. From Aye Dil Hai Mushkil Jeena Yahan to Bombay Meri Jaan, songs have celebrated its resilience, its spirit and its energy. Migrants still pour in, lured by jobs and opportunities, and the city continues to embrace them. Yet its generosity has come at a cost: infrastructure has failed to keep pace with demand. For the millions who commute daily, the frustration mounts not just at the sheer numbers but how poorly the authorities manage the very projects meant to ease the strain.


A freshly laid road outside a colony is dug up weeks later to lay a water pipe or cable. A metro staircase is designed to land on a highway median, only for the median itself to be demolished during road widening. Such duplication has become the trademark of Mumbai’s development story. Agencies rarely talk to one another; timelines are elastic and the infamous “chalta hai” attitude prevails.


That is not to say there is no progress. Metro pillars loom across the skyline, new flyovers take shape, and major roads are being rebuilt with promises of better drainage and stronger materials. The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) has launched one of the country’s most ambitious infrastructure drives, spanning metro lines, highways and urban renewal. But execution has been shoddy.


Ghodbunder Road illustrates the malaise. For residents of Thane and beyond, it is a lifeline into Mumbai. Yet it is notorious for potholes, jams and waterlogging. Trips that should take minutes stretch into hours each monsoon. Resurfacing is announced every year, but deadlines are missed with predictable regularity. Metro Line 4, running along the same corridor, has created further headaches as plans shift repeatedly and pedestrian access points clash with ongoing highway expansion. Instead of coordination, there is conflict between arms of the same authority, ensuring higher costs and longer delays.


The monorail offers an even starker warning. Once heralded as a modern solution, it has become a cautionary tale of poor planning and worse management. After years of patchy service, it has now been suspended indefinitely for an overhaul. In August, passengers were left stranded inside for hours without a proper rescue plan. That there were no casualties was mere luck. For those who relied on it, the suspension is nothing less than a betrayal.


Nor is the chaos limited to marquee projects. Road diversions during repair work are often announced at the last minute. Signage is inadequate, leaving drivers confused and jams multiplying. At Dahisar, one of the city’s key entry points, commuters confront potholes, waterlogging and crumbling infrastructure, even as political debates over relocating the check naka add to the uncertainty. Instead of presenting a gateway to India’s financial capital, these chokepoints showcase neglect.


Underlying all this is the absence of coordination. Metro projects, flyovers, drainage upgrades and road repairs are executed in silos. The left hand rarely knows what the right is doing. The fiasco in Nagpur, where a flyover ramp was built into a house balcony, is not an outlier but a symptom of systemic dysfunction. The monsoon exposes these flaws brutally. Roads crumble within months of being laid. Asphalt peels, potholes mushroom, and waterlogging cripples movement. Temporary patches last barely a season. Durable solutions require better materials, proper drainage and stricter supervision but short-termism prevails. Citizens have resigned themselves to this cycle of collapse and repair, year after year.


Delays are another constant. Contractors miss deadlines because of shortages, technical glitches or red tape. Penalties are announced but rarely enforced with vigour. Each postponement chips away at public trust. Worse still is the lack of communication. Closure of roads, diversions or bans on heavy vehicles are often declared abruptly, leaving commuters trapped in snarls without explanation. During festivals or peak travel, chaos is guaranteed. For a city that powers India’s economy, such lapses feel indefensible.


A deeper imbalance compounds matters. Authorities trumpet new projects but neglect the maintenance of old ones. Gleaming metro corridors dominate headlines, but basic upkeep of roads, check nakas and drainage systems is overlooked. The result is predictable: shiny infrastructure alongside collapsing essentials.


Yet no one doubts Mumbai’s need for expansion. Without metro lines, flyovers and better roads, the city would grind to a halt. The question is not whether to build, but how. Execution matters as much as vision. Development that exacts years of pain before offering relief risks exhausting public patience. Every hour lost in traffic is an hour stolen from family or work, an hour of stress or an hour inhaling polluted air. The uncertainty of how long a commute will take is itself corrosive.


Residents do not oppose progress; they oppose being treated as collateral damage. What they seek is humane development: realistic timelines, genuine coordination, honest communication and steady upkeep of what already exists. Authorities would do well to listen to locals, who know better than consultants which spots flood first, which junctions clog daily and which diversions confound drivers. Their input could save money, time and credibility.


Mumbai stands at a crossroads. Its growth cannot be halted and its infrastructure needs are undeniable. But ambition without accountability risks turning dreams into burdens. Unless officials learn to match vision with empathy, the songs that once celebrated Mumbai’s spirit may soon give way to laments about its daily grind. For now, the road to a better city remains under construction - literally and figuratively.


(The writer is a political observer. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page