top of page

By:

Akhilesh Sinha

25 June 2025 at 2:53:54 pm

Ideology, Illusion, and the Politics of Power

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi greets supporters during a roadshow ahead of the Kerala assembly polls, in Kozhikode district on Tuesday. | Pic: PTI New Delhi:  At a critical electoral juncture in Kerala, the political contest being waged in the name of ideology appears less about public welfare and more like a renewed struggle for the division of power. Kerala's electoral battle exposes contradictions between ideology and alliances, as BJP, Congress, and Left trade...

Ideology, Illusion, and the Politics of Power

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi greets supporters during a roadshow ahead of the Kerala assembly polls, in Kozhikode district on Tuesday. | Pic: PTI New Delhi:  At a critical electoral juncture in Kerala, the political contest being waged in the name of ideology appears less about public welfare and more like a renewed struggle for the division of power. Kerala's electoral battle exposes contradictions between ideology and alliances, as BJP, Congress, and Left trade accusations while prioritizing power, leaving voters questioning credibility, governance plans, and commitment to justice.   At the national level, the Congress and the Left position themselves as opponents of the Bharatiya Janata Party and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Yet before the public, they often appear equally eager to undercut one another. In Parliament, they join hands to bring no-confidence motions and accuse the government of misusing investigative agencies. However, at the state level, this coordination is conspicuously absent. In Kerala, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has alleged a nexus between the CPI(M) and the SDPI, even hinting at tacit understandings between the BJP and the Left. Meanwhile, LDF Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has dismissed these claims as "entirely baseless."   This persistent friction reinforces the impression that ideology has become largely symbolic, while the real contest revolves around consolidating vote banks and securing seats. The Left, invoking the language of "pragmatic alliances," signals readiness to align with the Congress at the national level. Yet in Kerala, it faces accusations of straying from its foundational principles, even as it projects itself as the principal alternative to the BJP.   Conspiracy factor Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has repeatedly asserted in his campaign rallies that this election is a contest between two ideologies-the Left and the UDF. Yet, he claims, for the first time there is an "unprecedented partnership" emerging between the Left and the BJP. He alleges that the CPI(M) can be easily controlled by the BJP, whereas the Congress-led UDF would not play into its hands. Such assertions risk creating the impression that ideological confrontation has now given way to a politics of expedient compromises.   On the other hand, CM Pinarayi Vijayan firmly maintains that his party neither seeks support from the SDPI nor engages in any covert understanding with communal forces. He portrays the Left Democratic Front as a formation grounded in "clear ideological principles" and resolutely opposed to communal politics. The contradiction here is striking that just as the BJP accuses the Congress and the Left of collusion, the Congress and the Left, in turn, level similar charges of "compromise" against each other.   Confused Electorate In Kerala's electoral theatre, PM Modi has branded both the UDF and the LDF as "each other's B team," while projecting the BJP as the only genuine "A team." His argument rests on the claim that the state has, for decades, been trapped between two traditional power blocs, one corrupt and the other allegedly even more so. He contends that both alliances have deceived the public through vote-bank politics, whereas the BJP now promises to "expose" their corruption and deliver "justice."   The larger question remains, when the Left and the Congress join hands in Parliament to oppose the BJP, is their unity rooted in a principled stand against the ruling party BJP/NDA, or is it merely political theatre calibrated for electoral convenience? If both claim to be ideologically committed formations, what justifies their readiness to confront each other in the states and often aggressively over vote banks?   Real Issues At the national level, the Left often raises its voice on substantive constitutional and economic questions; corruption, public debt, privatization, and decentralization. Yet, in the heat of elections, these very debates are reduced to the arithmetic of vote banks and seat shares. The BJP, as the ruling party, seeks to anchor its campaign in development metrics, flagship projects like the Vizhinjam Port, and symbolic initiatives such as the Nari Shakti Vandan Act, presenting them as tangible achievements before the electorate. The opposition, in turn, attempts to recast these same initiatives as narratives of "debt" and "plunder."

Three ways to avoid Traffic issues in Pune

The road widening program taken up by Pune Municipal Corporation is very helpful to ease the traffic problem as a short-term measure. For long term, the following measures are suggested: Educaion, Engineering and Enforcement


Children are the drivers of tomorrow, they learn many of their behaviors and attitudes from the adults of today. We regard citizen education as being central to the delivery of our core values, in the changing of habits and behaviors and supporting new initiatives and schemes to make our roads safer. We should launch resources to assist in this program of safety education offering resources that can be used by the Agency or its stakeholders to promote a safer network for all.


With Citizenship becoming an ever higher priority for the curriculum in both Primary and Secondary schools, we believe that improving and increasing our citizen education will contribute to improvements in safety on our roads. The NBF hasn’t stopped its engineering role; however more people are asking for better information: “Why is this happening?” “What are its benefits”, “How will this make our roads less congested and safer?”


Engineering steps

There should not be any stop at all in rush hours on few roads. We see lot of shop owner and society, apartment members park their vehicles on road causes traffic jam. We should avoid it. We should implement limited parking on few roads.


We should use separate bus lane for PMT stop. It is observed that the bus parking cause traffic snarls in peak hour. Close down unwanted cut of crossing the lanes. Build railing on road divider to prevent crossing road from anywhere. 


Remove encroachment

We observed rush hours between 9-11 am and 5-7 pm. If we can change the office timings of some government and private establishments we could solve the traffic problem. It is observed traffic is less on holidays.


We suggest that metro stations should have adequate parking facilities and each route should reach out of PMC limit. Flyovers need to be built at several places. Earmark separate space for auto rockshaws. Free footpaths from encroachments. Operate buses on time. No parking or halting should be allowed in a chowk.


(The writer is the President of an NGO Nirman Bharati. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page