top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

‘Bharat Ratna to Savarkar will increase its prestige’

Mumbai: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday threw his full weight behind the long-standing demand to confer the Bharat Ratna on Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, asserting that the Hindutva ideologue’s inclusion would enhance the dignity of the country’s highest civilian honour. Bhagwat, who explained the genesis and growth of the RSS over past 100 years in two lectures at the Nehru Centre here on Saturday and Sunday, replied to several...

‘Bharat Ratna to Savarkar will increase its prestige’

Mumbai: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday threw his full weight behind the long-standing demand to confer the Bharat Ratna on Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, asserting that the Hindutva ideologue’s inclusion would enhance the dignity of the country’s highest civilian honour. Bhagwat, who explained the genesis and growth of the RSS over past 100 years in two lectures at the Nehru Centre here on Saturday and Sunday, replied to several questions. While replying to one of the questions, he remarked, “If Swatantraveer Savarkar is given the Bharat Ratna, the prestige of the Bharat Ratna itself will increase.” He was asked, why there has been a delay in conferring the Bharat Ratna on Savarkar, in reply to which, Bhagwat said, “I am not part of that committee. But if I meet someone, I will ask. Even without that honour, he rules the hearts of millions of people.” he added. Social Divisions Bhagwat replied to questions that were clubbed in 14 different groups ranging from national security to environment, social harmony, youth, arts and sports. Whenever the questions suggested or expressed expectations that the RSS should do certain things, Bhagwat stressed on the involvement of the society and initiative from the society in resolving the problems. While addressing the critical issue of Uniform Civil Code, Bhagwat stated that the UCC should be framed by taking everyone into confidence and must not lead to social divisions. In the same way while replying to the question related to illegal migrants in the country, Bhagwat urged people to “detect and report” the “illegal infiltrators” to the police. He also urged people not to give them any employment and to be more “vigilant.” Backing SIR He highlighted that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise has already revealed the “foreigners” living in the country. “The government has a lot to do regarding infiltration. They have to detect and deport. This wasn’t happening until now, but it has started little by little, and it will gradually increase. When the census or the SIR is conducted, many people come to light who are not citizens of this country; they are automatically excluded from the process,” he said. “But we can do one thing: we can work on detection. Their language gives them away. We should detect them and report them to the appropriate authorities. We should inform the police that we suspect these people are foreigners, and they should investigate and keep an eye on them, and we will also keep an eye on them. We will not give employment to any foreigner. If someone is from our country, we will give them employment, but not to foreigners. You should be a little more vigilant and aware,” he added. SC Chief Emphasising the inclusivity of the Sangh, he said that anyone can become ‘Sarsanghchalak’ (RSS chief), including the SC and STs, as the decision is solely dependent on the work that any individual put for the organisation. “Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shudra or Brahmin does not qualify for the Sarsanghchalak position (RSS Chief), a Hindu will become the one who works and is best available. A Hindu will become, and that can also be an SC or ST. Anyone can become it depends on the work. Today, if you see, all classes have representation in the Sangh. The decision is taken on the basis of one who works and is best available,” he said. He pointed out that when the RSS was founded, its work began in a Brahmin-dominated community and hence, most of its founders were Brahmins, which led to the organisation being labelled as a Brahmin outfit at the time. People always look for an organisation that has representatives from their community, he said. “If I were to choose a chief, I would go by the ‘best available candidate’ criterion. When I was appointed RSS chief, there were many best candidates, but they were not available. I was the one who could be relieved from duties and appointed,” he said. He said that to belong to the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe communities is not a disqualification, and neither is being a Brahmin a qualification to become the RSS chief. Ready to step down if Sangh asks for Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday said the Sangh had asked him to continue working despite his age, while stressing that he would step down from the post whenever the organisation directs him to do so. “There is no election to the post of RSS chief. Regional and divisional heads appoint the chief. Generally, it is said that after turning 75, one should work without holding any post,” Bhagwat said. “I have completed 75 years and informed the RSS, but the organisation asked me to continue working. Whenever the RSS asks me to step down, I will do so, but retirement from work will never happen,” he said.

Murderous Matrimony

Marriage, that venerable institution of love and duty, is increasingly being transformed into a theatre of crime. The recent spate of cold-blooded murders in India, where wives have conspired to kill their husbands, exposes a sinister breakdown of moral compunction. The chilling tales from Uttar Pradesh, Jaipur and Mumbai are grim indicators of a society where marriage is no longer a sacred bond but a contractual inconvenience, to be annulled not by courts but by murder.


Consider the case of Pragati Yadav from Uttar Pradesh’s Mainpuri district. Forced into marriage by her family, she sought to undo the arrangement not through divorce but through killing. Within weeks of her wedding, she plotted with her lover and paid a contract killer to eliminate her husband, lured to his death under false pretenses. What is most disturbing is not just the premeditated nature of the murder but the apparent lack of remorse. The notion that marriage can be undone with a gunshot speaks volumes about the erosion of both personal responsibility and the sanctity of the institution itself.


Elsewhere in Uttar Pradesh, in the city of Meerut, another wife, Muskan Rastogi, concocted an even more macabre scheme to get rid of her husband. Preying on her lover’s superstitions, she impersonated his deceased mother on social media to manipulate him into believing that her husband’s death was a divine decree. This bizarre and convoluted ploy culminated in the husband’s brutal murder and dismemberment. Not only did the couple murder him in cold blood, but they also cemented his remains into a drum before setting off on a vacation to Himachal Pradesh, as if the crime had been no more than a bureaucratic errand.


Similar horrors have played out in Jaipur and Mumbai. In Rajasthan’s capital, a wife, caught in the glare of CCTV cameras, was seen riding pillion on a motorbike, carrying the lifeless body of her husband wrapped in white fabric. She and her lover had bludgeoned him to death, loaded his corpse onto the bike, and set it on fire by the roadside. In Mumbai’s Goregaon, another woman facilitated the strangulation of her husband in his sleep, plotting with her lover and his accomplices.


The question is why marry at all if one has no intention of honoring the commitment? Arranged marriages in India are deeply ingrained, often prioritizing familial expectations over individual preferences. Yet, if a marriage is so unbearable, the options of separation or divorce exist. In many cases, these murders are not just crimes of passion but calculated acts of financial and personal gain. The hope of inheriting wealth or eliminating an obstacle to a clandestine affair appears to be an overriding motivation. The commodification of human life has reached a point where a spouse can be erased from existence for a modest sum.


While the legal system must ensure swift and exemplary punishment, there is a need for a cultural reckoning. If this bleak trend continues, the country risks normalizing a dystopian vision of marriage, where vows are taken in public but rescinded in private with a hired assassin’s bullet or a lover’s noose.

Comments


bottom of page