top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Of Snakes, Storms and Stateless Souls

In a literary era crowded with climate fiction, Amitav Ghosh’s ‘Gun Island’ stands apart not for its science, but for its faith in myth, in migration and in the enduring power of the tale itself.


In Gun Island, Amitav Ghosh performs a literary sleight of hand that merges the mythic and the modern, the ecological and the existential into an ambrosial cocktail of narrative craft. First published in 2019, the novel is at once a fable and a forecast, a story that straddles continents and consciousness. It stakes fair claim to being Ghosh’s most urgent novel and perhaps his most restless, for it refuses to stay within the neat boundaries of genre or geography.


The book begins with Dinanath Datta (known simply as Deen), a dealer in rare books and Asian antiquities, whose tranquil Brooklyn existence is upended by a request from his elderly aunt. She persuades him to travel to the Sundarbans, the world’s largest mangrove forest, spread across Bengal and Bangladesh to investigate the legend of a sixteenth-century gun merchant, BondukiSadagar, who built a shrine to the snake goddess Manasa Devi on what locals call “Gun Island.” The merchant, lore says, sought to flee the goddess’s wrath; Ghosh, however, turns this myth into an allegory for humanity’s flight from nature itself.


From this premise, Ghosh constructs a web that spans oceans. In Kolkata, Deen encounters Piya, a marine biologist and a recurring figure from The Hungry Tide, whose scientific rationalism contrasts sharply with Deen’s bookish scepticism. Together with Moyna, a nurse, and her rebellious son Tipu, they navigate the treacherous waters of the Sundarbans, where myth and mangrove intertwine. Tipu, guilt-shadowed and restless, soon reveals his complicity in a migrant-smuggling network in Bangladesh.


The story’s geographic drift, from the tidal creeks of Bengal to the labyrinthine canals of Venice, echoes the journeys of Ghosh’s own characters across his earlier works, from The Glass Palace to Sea of Poppies. Yet Gun Island feels more contemporary, even prophetic. Its concerns are not imperial nostalgia or colonial commerce, but displacement, climate migration, and the uncanny persistence of myth in the modern world.


In Venice, the novel’s second act, Deen reunites with Rafi, a temple boy turned construction worker, whose story mirrors the real-world refugee crisis that Ghosh weaves into his narrative. Rafi’s struggle to bring Tipu to Italy through illegal migrant routes becomes a haunting reflection of a planet on the move. The lagoon city, with its sinking foundations, becomes both stage and symbol: a European Sundarbans, fragile before the rising tide.


Ghosh has long wrestled with how literature can address the climate crisis. In his nonfiction work The Great Derangement, he argued that modern fiction, with its bourgeois focus on individual destiny, has failed to capture the scale of planetary catastrophe. Gun Island reads as his answer to that lament. Where earlier writers such as Margaret Atwood (Oryx and Crake) and Richard Powers (The Overstory) used dystopia and the arboreal to dramatize ecological collapse, Ghosh returns to the oldest of narrative devices: myth.


The snake goddess Manasa, who slithers through the story’s metaphors, stands as an emblem of ecological retribution and divine indifference. The gun merchant’s flight across centuries becomes humanity’s collective denial—our refusal to reckon with the deities we have angered: the seas, the soil, the air. Ghosh’s blend of magic realism and ethnography recalls Gabriel García Márquez’s One Hundred Years of Solitude and Ben Okri’s The Famished Road, yet his idiom remains distinctively Indian, rooted in the brackish delta where superstition and survival share space.


Deen’s evolution from sceptic to believer, from detached scholar to participant—forms the novel’s emotional spine. His friendship with Cinta, an elderly Venetian historian who deciphers the ancient inscriptions in the shrine, introduces an intellectual tenderness that softens the novel’s apocalyptic undertone.


At times, the plot teeters on excess as coincidences abound, and the magical elements verge on didactic. Yet this, too, seems deliberate. Ghosh is less interested in realism than in resonance. His musical prose evokes a sense of inevitability, as if myth itself were dictating the plot. He is writing not merely a novel, but a lamentation for a world in retreat.


By its end, Gun Island offers not despair but a sliver of grace. In its final moments, as the characters glimpse the possibility of redemption amidst ruin, the novel reminds readers that migration - of people, of species, of stories - is both consequence and continuity.


(The writer is a Mumbai based educator. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page