top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 9:59:04 pm

Fatal Negligence

Newborns dying in a fire inside a government hospital is a devastating indictment of a system that is supposed to protect its most vulnerable patients. The Amravati District Women’s Hospital tragedy, where a blaze killed three infants, joins a long list of preventable institutional failures. Thirty-nine babies were inside the three-compartment facility when the fire erupted after a ventilator in the neonatal unit caught fire. Thirty-six were eventually rescued. Parents and eyewitnesses have...

Fatal Negligence

Newborns dying in a fire inside a government hospital is a devastating indictment of a system that is supposed to protect its most vulnerable patients. The Amravati District Women’s Hospital tragedy, where a blaze killed three infants, joins a long list of preventable institutional failures. Thirty-nine babies were inside the three-compartment facility when the fire erupted after a ventilator in the neonatal unit caught fire. Thirty-six were eventually rescued. Parents and eyewitnesses have alleged that the fire alarms did not sound and the automatic sprinklers failed to activate even as the district administration has said the hospital underwent regular fire audits and had applied for this year’s audit. An audit is meaningful only if it establishes that equipment works when lives depend on it. Maharashtra has already witnessed the deadly consequences of fire-safety failures in public hospitals. In 2021, eleven Covid-19 patients died in a fire at the Ahmednagar district hospital even though a fire audit conducted months earlier had recommended a firefighting system. The Amravati tragedy demands more than the familiar ritual of a high-level inquiry, compensation and promises of “strictest action”. The announcement of ex gratia payments cannot compensate parents who have lost a child they had barely begun to know. The investigation must establish not merely what ignited the fire, but why it was allowed to become fatal. Was the ventilator properly maintained? Were electrical and medical devices routinely inspected? Did alarms function? Were sprinklers operational? Was the NICU appropriately located and equipped for evacuation? Were staff trained and drills conducted? And most importantly, who was responsible for ensuring that every safeguard worked? There is another troubling detail: the neonatal unit was reportedly housed on the third floor, rather than at ground level, and questions have arisen over whether the unit was part of the building’s original plan. The state has built an elaborate architecture of laws and child-protection standards which seldom matches the situation on ground. Whether in government hospitals, schools or anganwadis, safety has become a box to be ticked rather than a responsibility to be lived. The most vulnerable children are consequently left dependent not on systems, but on the vigilance and heroism of individual staff members. That is an appalling way to run the childcare infrastructure of one India’s most developed states. A NICU is perhaps the worst possible place for institutional complacency: its patients are immobile, medically dependent and extraordinarily vulnerable to smoke, heat and even brief disruption of life-support equipment. The government must ensure that the Amravati deaths do not become another entry in the grim ledger of hospital tragedies followed by inquiries, outrage and forgetting. The real test will be whether the state can prevent the next newborn from dying in a hospital that was supposed to save him.

Operation Sindoor: All you need to know – weapons used, key targets struck across Pakistan and POK




New Delhi: In the early hours of Wednesday, India carried out a large-scale military operation—Operation Sindoor—targeting terrorist bases across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (POK). The operation included coordinated strikes by the Indian Army, Air Force, and Navy. It’s the biggest precision strike since the 2019 Balakot airstrikes.


This mission was launched in response to the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, where 26 civilians, including an Indian Navy officer and a Nepali national, were killed. The attackers were linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a Pakistan-based terror group accused of receiving support from the Pakistani government.


Weapons Used in Operation Sindoor

India used advanced, long-range precision weapons during the operation:

  • SCALP (Storm Shadow) Cruise Missile: A long-range air-launched missile with over 250 km range, used for deep strikes.

  • HAMMER Bombs: These smart bombs can hit targets 50–70 km away, depending on launch height. They were used against heavily built terrorist bases, like bunkers and multi-storey buildings.

  • Loitering Munitions (Kamikaze Drones): These drones hovered over targets to gather intel and destroy them. They were used to hit targets precisely, either remotely or autonomously.


Targets Hit in the Strikes

India struck nine terror-linked locations—four in Pakistan and five in POK. According to the Ministry of Defence, no Pakistani military bases were targeted. All sites were verified as operational hubs for banned terror groups.

Main Targets:

  • Markaz Subhan Allah, Bahawalpur (JeM): Jaish-e-Mohammed’s headquarters, used for senior-level training.

  • Markaz Taiba, Muridke (LeT): A 200-acre base for planning and indoctrination. One of the most fortified targets.

  • Markaz Abbas, Kotli (JeM): A suicide bomber training and weapons hub in POK.

  • Syedna Bilal and Shawai Nalla Camps, Muzaffarabad (JeM & LeT): Infiltration and training sites for sleeper cells.

  • Markaz Ahle Hadith, Barnala (LeT): A logistics and support centre.

  • Sarjal, Tehra Kalan (JeM): A pre-infiltration training camp.

  • Mehmoona Joya, Sialkot (HM): A lesser-known Hizbul Mujahideen training centre still in use.

Comments

bottom of page