top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

Pager Blasts: A Global Threat?

Updated: Oct 21, 2024

Pager Blasts

Imagine ending your day, exhausted, but pausing before using your phone, laptop, or car radio. In Lebanon, such hesitation is now part of daily life. A new wave of terror – reportedly triggered by Israel in its relentless campaign to cripple Hezbollah - has shaken the country, with explosive devices embedded in pagers, walkie-talkies, and even solar cells. The devastation is staggering: over 30 dead and nearly 3,000 injured. This is a conflict not fought with drones or tanks, but with the very electronics that power modern life.

The scale and sophistication of these attacks suggest a well-calculated strategy aimed at spreading fear and chaos. While the immediate target is Hezbollah, the potential for this digital warfare to spread beyond Lebanon is a terrifying prospect. As nations like Iran, Syria, and other anti-Israel forces watch with alarm, the world is left asking: is anyone safe from this new form of electronic sabotage?

What began as an isolated conflict between Israel and Hezbollah could have far-reaching consequences. The attacks on electronic devices, now a critical part of daily life, have sparked fears that the entire supply chain - spanning from manufacturers in Taiwan and Japan to retail outlets worldwide - may become tainted. Consumers, already jittery from rising global tensions, could begin to shy away from the very products that keep the world connected.

The implications are clear - a decline in consumer trust, economic shockwaves, and a scramble to implement expensive screening technologies across global markets. Yet the fear of such attacks going mainstream is what truly haunts policymakers. Israel and Hezbollah are not the only adversaries with deep-seated rivalries. With tensions simmering between Russia and Ukraine, China and its neighbours in Southeast Asia, and even India and Pakistan, it is not hard to imagine this new form of electronic sabotage becoming a favoured tactic in global conflicts.

India, with its large population and dependency on imported electronics, is particularly vulnerable. Consider the fact that a vast portion of the world’s consumer electronics are made in China - a country with which India has an uneasy relationship. Moreover, Pakistan, which has long sought to destabilize India, could see this as an opportunity to stir chaos, possibly with support from other regional players like China or Turkey.

The potential for widespread harm is clear. India has been no stranger to terrorist attacks, from the 2006 Mumbai train bombings to the 26/11 attacks. And while the country has developed a robust defence against conventional terror, the emerging threat of electronic sabotage demands new, preventive measures. If India is to avoid disaster, advanced detection systems will need to be implemented across the country - at ports, airports, and even consumer electronics stores. This will undoubtedly add costs, but in a world where electronic warfare could become the new norm, the investment is a small price to pay.

As nations worldwide grapple with the implications of Israel’s latest campaign against Hezbollah, one thing is certain: the old rules of war no longer apply. With the ability to turn everyday electronics into weapons, this digital conflict is reshaping the global security landscape. Nations will need to rethink how they approach security, trade, and diplomacy in an era where any device could be a Trojan horse.

For Lebanon, the immediate aftermath is grim: a country on edge, citizens afraid of their own devices. But the rest of the world, too, must confront the unsettling reality that digital sabotage is no longer a far-off possibility. It is here to stay, and is a threat that no nation can afford to ignore.

Comments


bottom of page