top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

New icon of party loyalty amid world of turncoats

Mumbai: In the competitive landscape of Mumbai’s municipal politics, Akshata Tendulkar has emerged as a symbol of ideological steadfastness and party loyalty. Known as a “staunch Hindutva voice” in the Mahim-Dadar belt, she has navigated a political terrain historically dominated by regional heavyweights like the Shiv Sena (UBT) and the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS). The Mahim-Dadar area has long been the ideological heart of Mumbai’s politics. For a BJP leader to carve out a niche as a...

New icon of party loyalty amid world of turncoats

Mumbai: In the competitive landscape of Mumbai’s municipal politics, Akshata Tendulkar has emerged as a symbol of ideological steadfastness and party loyalty. Known as a “staunch Hindutva voice” in the Mahim-Dadar belt, she has navigated a political terrain historically dominated by regional heavyweights like the Shiv Sena (UBT) and the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS). The Mahim-Dadar area has long been the ideological heart of Mumbai’s politics. For a BJP leader to carve out a niche as a prominent proponent of Hindutva in this specific geography is a significant feat. Tendulkar’s rise is attributed to her vocal and uncompromising stance on cultural and religious identity, which has resonated with a traditional voter base that feels a deep connection to the Hindutva narrative. In an era where political affiliations are often fluid, Tendulkar’s career reached a defining moment during the seat-sharing negotiations of the Mahayuti alliance. When her preferred ward was allocated to the Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde faction) as part of the coalition agreement, she faced a difficult choice: switch banners to stay in the race or stand down. Striking Aspect The most striking aspect of Tendulkar’s profile is her refusal to compromise on her political identity for the sake of an electoral ticket. Recognizing her local influence and the strength of her “Hindutva voice,” the Shiv Sena reportedly offered her a ticket to contest the election under their “bow and arrow” symbol. While many politicians today—often referred to as “turncoats”—regularly cross party-lines to secure power, Tendulkar chose a different path. She famously declined the offer, insisting that she remained committed to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP); that she would only contest as a candidate representing the party she had served and that her loyalty to the organisation outweighed her personal ambition for office. Rare Precedent “This is a very rare example of party loyalty in today’s times. I’m happy that such examples can be found only in the BJP,” said city BJP spokesperson Niranjan Shetty. He also highlighted that by choosing to withdraw from the race rather than abandon her party’s flag, Tendulkar set a rare precedent in contemporary Maharashtra politics. Her decision reinforced her image as a leader driven by conviction rather than opportunism. “She has earned the leadership by her fearless acts and uncompromising nature when it comes to issues related to Hindutva,” said senior RSS worker from Dadar area, Ramesh Deole. “Her decision today will be remembered for times to come,” he added. While it might be a ‘Political Harakiri’ in opinion of a few political analysts. But, with her act today she has actually given herself a larger identity. Today, she is viewed not just as a local leader from Ward 192, but as a “distinct example of loyalty.” Her background as a fierce advocate for Hindutva remains her calling card, making her a critical asset for the BJP in the heart of Mumbai. In a city where political winds shift rapidly, Akshata Tendulkar stands as a reminder of the power of ideological consistency.

Poison in the Pipes

Indore’s carefully polished image as ‘India’s cleanest city’ has been punctured by a lethal incident of contaminated water killing its residents.

Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh

For years, Indore has been paraded as an urban success story. It has topped the Swachh Survekshan rankings with numbing regularity while its cleanliness has been showcased primarily as a matter of sweeping streets and polishing reputations. Yet in Bhagirathpura this week, beneath the bunting of civic pride, at least seven people died and more than a hundred were hospitalised after drinking what was meant to be safe municipal water. A city that congratulates itself for spotless roads could not keep sewage out of its pipes.


The facts are grim enough without embellishment. Residents complained for days that their tap water smelled foul and tasted bitter. Vomiting and diarrhoea followed as the elderly collapsed and citizens began dying en route to hospital. Only after bodies began to pile up did the machinery of the state whir into action by surveying thousands of households and sending water samples sent for testing. Initial assessments suggest that drainage water may have mixed with the drinking supply, possibly through a leaking pipeline over which a toilet had been constructed. In a city that claims to lead the nation in sanitation, human waste appears to have flowed straight into kitchen taps.


The political response has followed a depressingly familiar script. Suspensions were announced as though contamination were the result of a few errant underlings rather than systemic rot.


This tragedy cuts deeper because Indore’s reputation is central to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s urban narrative in Madhya Pradesh. The city is held up as proof that the BJP’s ‘triple-engine government’ - municipal, state and centre aligned - delivers results. Cleanliness rankings have been weaponised as political capital, deployed in campaigns and speeches as evidence of administrative competence. But the rankings only reward visible order like segregated waste, tidy intersections, well-curated public toilets. They do not measure the integrity of underground pipes laid decades ago, nor the institutional indifference that allows sewage and drinking water to mingle.


The opposition Congress has predictably pounced, demanding cases of culpable homicide against the mayor and municipal commissioner. Some of its rhetoric veers into opportunism. Yet it is hard to dismiss the core charge that residents’ complaints were ignored. In a functioning city, foul-smelling water ought to trigger serious alarm. In Indore, it regrettably took several deaths to force attention.


This is not merely a local lapse but one that is emblematic of India’s urban malaise. Cities obsess over branding while neglecting plumbing. Flyovers and facades win votes while invisible infrastructure does not. Water systems remain fragile, poorly monitored and riddled with informal modifications. The mixing of sewage and drinking water is not a freak accident but a known risk, especially in dense settlements where pipes are old and oversight is lax. That it occurred in Indore - a model city - should unsettle every urban administrator in the country.


There is also a deeper moral hazard at play. Awards create incentives to game the visible metrics while ignoring the essentials. A city can be ‘clean’ and still be unsafe. A government can win plaudits and still preside over preventable deaths.


The deaths in Bhagirathpura should force a reckoning beyond suspensions and compensation. Who approved a toilet over a main water pipeline? Why were complaints not escalated? How many other neighbourhoods drink from similarly compromised systems? And why does responsibility always stop short of political heads, even when civic failure is structural?


Indore’s tragedy is not that it fell short of perfection. It is that it mistook appearances for outcomes. One must give credit to the city’s authorities for helping it achieve the moniker of the cleanest city. Yet, while clean streets are commendable, clean water is non-negotiable. Until Indian cities learn the difference and until political leaders are held accountable not for rankings but for results, the poison will always remain out of sight and in the pipes. 

 


Comments


bottom of page