top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Poison in the Pipes

Indore’s carefully polished image as ‘India’s cleanest city’ has been punctured by a lethal incident of contaminated water killing its residents.

Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh

For years, Indore has been paraded as an urban success story. It has topped the Swachh Survekshan rankings with numbing regularity while its cleanliness has been showcased primarily as a matter of sweeping streets and polishing reputations. Yet in Bhagirathpura this week, beneath the bunting of civic pride, at least seven people died and more than a hundred were hospitalised after drinking what was meant to be safe municipal water. A city that congratulates itself for spotless roads could not keep sewage out of its pipes.


The facts are grim enough without embellishment. Residents complained for days that their tap water smelled foul and tasted bitter. Vomiting and diarrhoea followed as the elderly collapsed and citizens began dying en route to hospital. Only after bodies began to pile up did the machinery of the state whir into action by surveying thousands of households and sending water samples sent for testing. Initial assessments suggest that drainage water may have mixed with the drinking supply, possibly through a leaking pipeline over which a toilet had been constructed. In a city that claims to lead the nation in sanitation, human waste appears to have flowed straight into kitchen taps.


The political response has followed a depressingly familiar script. Suspensions were announced as though contamination were the result of a few errant underlings rather than systemic rot.


This tragedy cuts deeper because Indore’s reputation is central to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s urban narrative in Madhya Pradesh. The city is held up as proof that the BJP’s ‘triple-engine government’ - municipal, state and centre aligned - delivers results. Cleanliness rankings have been weaponised as political capital, deployed in campaigns and speeches as evidence of administrative competence. But the rankings only reward visible order like segregated waste, tidy intersections, well-curated public toilets. They do not measure the integrity of underground pipes laid decades ago, nor the institutional indifference that allows sewage and drinking water to mingle.


The opposition Congress has predictably pounced, demanding cases of culpable homicide against the mayor and municipal commissioner. Some of its rhetoric veers into opportunism. Yet it is hard to dismiss the core charge that residents’ complaints were ignored. In a functioning city, foul-smelling water ought to trigger serious alarm. In Indore, it regrettably took several deaths to force attention.


This is not merely a local lapse but one that is emblematic of India’s urban malaise. Cities obsess over branding while neglecting plumbing. Flyovers and facades win votes while invisible infrastructure does not. Water systems remain fragile, poorly monitored and riddled with informal modifications. The mixing of sewage and drinking water is not a freak accident but a known risk, especially in dense settlements where pipes are old and oversight is lax. That it occurred in Indore - a model city - should unsettle every urban administrator in the country.


There is also a deeper moral hazard at play. Awards create incentives to game the visible metrics while ignoring the essentials. A city can be ‘clean’ and still be unsafe. A government can win plaudits and still preside over preventable deaths.


The deaths in Bhagirathpura should force a reckoning beyond suspensions and compensation. Who approved a toilet over a main water pipeline? Why were complaints not escalated? How many other neighbourhoods drink from similarly compromised systems? And why does responsibility always stop short of political heads, even when civic failure is structural?


Indore’s tragedy is not that it fell short of perfection. It is that it mistook appearances for outcomes. One must give credit to the city’s authorities for helping it achieve the moniker of the cleanest city. Yet, while clean streets are commendable, clean water is non-negotiable. Until Indian cities learn the difference and until political leaders are held accountable not for rankings but for results, the poison will always remain out of sight and in the pipes. 

 


Comments


bottom of page