top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Pope Francis: A Shepherd of Compassion

In life, he bridged tradition and change with humanity and grace; in death, he leaves a Church forever touched by his heart.

Pope Francis has passed away. After several weeks, struggling with respiratory issues and serious pneumonia, the pope has died. Even as we witnessed his illness and acknowledged its seriousness, we continued to hope that he would pull through, but God has called him to himself.


Francis was elected by the college of Cardinals to succeed Benedict the 16th who had resigned from the papacy. Benedict’s resignation was almost unprecedented. The decision was somewhat shocking for the Catholic community and totally unexpected.


Prior to his election as pope, Francis had served as the archbishop of Buenos Aires in Argentina. For many Catholics Francis was an unknown as the primate of Argentina. He was well known throughout South America, but unfamiliar to North Americans and many Europeans. As he began his ministry, he quickly revealed his understanding of the church and its mission. In some ways, he appeared indecisive as he tried to preserve the traditions, the beliefs and the guidelines of the church historically. At the same time, he recognized that the world had changed and that the church itself would need to change. We soon learned that this new pope was different from his predecessor and many before him.


I am a Catholic priest and have been for 50 years. In my lifetime, there have been seven popes, five since my ordination, each with a distinct perspective on his role as Pontiff, each devoted to the Church. Of these seven popes Francis was undoubtedly the most unique.


Evolution is a fact of life in the world, in society and even in the church. Evolution, however, is not always linear. The constant is neither progress nor regression but change itself. As Pope Francis illustrated progress, worked for justice and saw the betterment of human life and human conditions as his primary mission.


Throughout his ministry, he faced opposition. His words and his actions were frequently described as controversial. To the more conservative members of the hierarchy and many Catholics, he was seen as too radical. More liberal elements within the church saw him as a breath of fresh air. In his own view, he was simply projecting the mind and heart of Jesus himself.


As a member of the clergy on the more liberal side of the conversation, I saw in Francis a model of compassion and humanity. In every age, those in power and authority must choose between legality and rules and the good of the people over whom they hold authority. Francis chose the people.


Among the ‘controversial’ words and actions criticized by the conservatives in the church and welcomed by the more liberal leaning, were statements regarding divorced and remarried Catholics, a kinder approach to those in less conventional situations. Francis was not, as some have claimed, a radical out to undermine Church order or tradition. Rather, he prioritized the principles of love, caring, and understanding. He saw the mission of the church as service to the children of God, all men, all women.


In addressing the reality of LGBT people, he rejected the judgmental approach of so many in religious leadership and recognized the shared humanity of all human beings.


As a priest, I have worked with many individuals who agonized over the gap between their own lives and circumstances and their faith, as that faith was expressed by the church, hierarchy and many of their parish priests.


For many people, regardless of cultural backgrounds, customs and traditions, religious beliefs and practices, have a profound influence, not just on their lives, but on the societies in which they live. Pope Francis rejected much of the judgment that religion imposed on people as individuals or families and on society in general.


For a very long time, divorce was seen as an unmitigated evil. In our lifetime, we have seen the change in which we recognize that divorce is often the only option or the best option. What set Francis apart from previous popes and religious leaders in the Catholic Church is an openness to the real world in which people live, a step back from judgment to compassion.


As a priest and a gay man, the approach which Francis took towards the LGBT community was a hopeful sign. When people are seen as sharing a common humanity and not condemned for who they are. Francis clearly stated that it was unjust to condemn or criminalize anyone for who they are.


(The author has been a priest in Washington, DC for 50 years. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page