top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 8:56:24 pm

Sack, jail Kumar: Uddhav

Mumbai: Shiv Sena (UBT) President Uddhav Thackeray today demanded the immediate removal and arrest of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar and fresh elections in Maharashtra, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu in the wake of differences emerging in the Election Commission of India’s top brass. Referring to reports in a media report that two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had reportedly raised objections on multiple occasions over certain decisions concerning...

Sack, jail Kumar: Uddhav

Mumbai: Shiv Sena (UBT) President Uddhav Thackeray today demanded the immediate removal and arrest of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar and fresh elections in Maharashtra, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu in the wake of differences emerging in the Election Commission of India’s top brass. Referring to reports in a media report that two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had reportedly raised objections on multiple occasions over certain decisions concerning electoral rolls and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR), Thackeray accused the ECI of becoming ‘a part of a wider political operation’ intended to weaken democratic institutions. “There’s a ‘gang’ of people within the election system that is conniving to split political parties, grab their names and poll symbols, and are ‘murdering democracy’. The horrific, ugly and grotesque face of Gyanesh Kumar has been exposed. The Supreme Court must take suo motu cognizance of the entire controversy,” demanded Thackeray. Pointing to the ECI claims that it follows the directives of the Ministry of Home Affairs, he said “this raises questions whether the Home Minister is the ‘mastermind’, which needs to be clarified”. “If so, then he too must face the appropriate punishment,” said Thackeray, hinting at Amit Shah. Dwelling on the expose on ECI, he slammed the poll panel for “operating in an arbitrary fashion with Gyanesh Kumar, who is driven by a lust for power”, and reiterated that the CEC must be removed and jailed forthwith. To a query on following the rules, Thackeray shot back: “Did he follow the rules? Then why talk of rules for him sack and jail him. We salute the two ECs (Sandhu and Joshi) for bringing this out and opening the eyes of the country.” Attempting to douse the flames engulfing its credibility, the ECI said that there may be differences but these were thoroughly discussed and all the final decisions were taken unanimously by all the three top functionaries with their signatures. Thackery said around 45 lakh voters were added to the electoral rolls between the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections (both 2024), and objections were subsequently raised on more than 40 lakh of those voter names. NCP (SP) seeks all-party meet The Sharad Pawar-led NCP (SP) on Wednesday called for an immediate all-party meeting to discuss reports of differences emerging within the Election Commission, saying the issue concerns the constitutional rights of every citizen and should not be treated as a political matter. She said the allegations should be discussed openly to establish whether there was any substance in them. Asked if Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar should “step aside”, Sule said there should be an open discussion on whether the allegations are true. “If the system is going to collapse, then who we should trust in this country,” the Lok Sabha member from Baramati constituency in western Maharashtra said.

Reputation Is the Real Asset

Mar 22
3 min read

Your reputation is the only KPI everyone tracks without data

In a legacy MSME, people don’t follow strategy. They follow evidence of who you are, especially when things get messy. And the evidence doesn’t come from your PowerPoint. It comes from your pattern.

  • Inherited seat: People will give you initial respect. They’ll still test whether you’re consistent or emotional.

  • Hired seat: People will judge you faster. Your reputation starts at zero, and every week adds or subtracts.

  • Promoted seat: People already know you. Your challenge is different: will you become fair, or will you become “selective”?


Different seats. Same truth: your reputation becomes your currency.


Credit Test

Let me explain this using something everyone understands. In every industrial area, there’s that one supplier who gives credit. Not because he is a charity. Because he knows who pays, who delays, and who creates drama.


Two businesses can buy the same material at the same rate. But their terms will be different. One gets 30 days credit with a smile. The other gets “cash only”. Why? Reputation.

And reputation is not a speech. It is a track record of small actions:

  • paid on time, even when inconvenient

  • didn’t play games

  • didn’t shout when there was an issue

  • escalated only when needed

  • respected the supplier’s reality


That’s how your team sees you too.


Why this matters?

Here is the war most incoming leaders lose:

They think they need one big intervention, one big restructuring, one big system rollout, one big “strictness moment”. But legacy MSMEs don’t change because of one big moment.


They change because people decide, over time, that you are predictable enough to follow.


In game theory language, your leadership is not a one-time deal. It’s a “repeated game”. Meaning: you meet the same people again and again, and they adjust based on your last move.


You don’t need to use the term. Just notice the reality:

  • The same sales head will meet you 30 times.

  • The same factory supervisor will face you in 20 small crises.

  • The same old-guard person will test your tone repeatedly.

  • The same vendor will watch if you stand by your word.


In a repeated setting, people aren’t asking, “Is this decision logical?” They’re asking, “What kind of person is this leader? What happens if I trust them?” Robert Axelrod studied this through famous experiments on cooperation. His simple finding – again, in plain language – was: in repeated interactions, cooperation wins when it is backed by consistent, proportionate enforcement.


Not softness. Not aggression. Consistency.


Leadership Mistake

Most incoming leaders swing between two bad extremes:

Extreme 1: The nice leader

  • avoids confrontation

  • adjusts every rule for every person

  • “lets it go” to maintain harmony

Result: people like you, but don’t follow you.


Extreme 2: The strict leader

  • overreacts to first failure

  • makes examples publicly

  • escalates fast

Result: compliance for a week, and then smarter avoidance, politics, and silence.

Both extremes destroy reputation. Because reputation is built on one thing: people can predict your response.


Think of it like a supplier again:

  • If a customer delays once, he doesn’t ban them for life.

  • But he also doesn’t keep giving full credit like nothing happened.

  • He adjusts terms. Calmly.

That calm adjustment is the whole point.


In an MSME, the leader who wins is not the one who “wins arguments”.


It’s the one who builds a reputation for:

  • fairness

  • consistency

  • low drama

  • clear consequences

  • quick forgiveness when behavior improves

This is what makes people cooperate without fear.


Field Test

For the next 30 days, try this rule: Cooperate first + proportional response.

Meaning:

  1. Start with trust. Give people a clean first chance.

  2. When someone breaks the deal, respond but don’t explode.

  3. Make the response proportional and visible. Not humiliating. Just clear.

  4. If they correct behavior, reset. Don’t keep punishing forever.


(The author is a co-founder at PPS Consulting. He is a business transformation consultant. He could be reached at rahul@ppsconsulting.biz.)

1 Comment


Nice read, the topic is explained clearly and is very helpful for daily price tracking. I recently explored NiftyTrader while looking into Silver Rate Today in Bangalore.

Like
bottom of page