top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 9:59:04 pm

Hidden Questions

For six years, the Disha Salian case has remained trapped in a fog of unanswered questions, disputed narratives and institutional inaction. It appears that the fog is now finally beginning to lift. The CBI’s recent FIR has brought into the investigation a startling array of names including Shiv Sena (UBT) leader and MLA Aaditya Thackeray, his father, Sena (UBT) chief and former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, Dino Morea, Sooraj Pancholi, Rhea Chakraborty, Sachin Vaze, Param Bir Singh, and...

Hidden Questions

For six years, the Disha Salian case has remained trapped in a fog of unanswered questions, disputed narratives and institutional inaction. It appears that the fog is now finally beginning to lift. The CBI’s recent FIR has brought into the investigation a startling array of names including Shiv Sena (UBT) leader and MLA Aaditya Thackeray, his father, Sena (UBT) chief and former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, Dino Morea, Sooraj Pancholi, Rhea Chakraborty, Sachin Vaze, Param Bir Singh, and former home minister Anil Deshmukh. The allegations being investigated include conspiracy, destruction or suppression of evidence and an alleged attempt to establish a false narrative around Salian’s death. For Aaditya and the MVA, the instinctive political response will be to dub the CBI’s fresh probe as ‘vendetta’ and portray the investigation as an assault on the Thackeray family. But such a response would evade the much larger question of why this case was allowed to remain where it was for so long? At the very least, the filing of the FIR against the Thackerays’ and others lays bare the failure on part of the erstwhile MVA government headed by Uddhav Thackeray to properly investigate the case. This aspect cannot be wished away now by invoking political persecution as the Bombay High Court’s intervention has itself exposed the extraordinary manner in which the matter was handled. For years, Salian’s death remained an accidental-death case rather than being subjected to the kind of criminal investigation demanded by the allegations surrounding it. Her family has repeatedly sought a CBI probe only to be rebuffed by the previous Maharashtra government headed by Uddhav Thackeray. If the Thackeray-led MVA government had nothing to fear, why was a transparent investigation not pursued with greater urgency? If there was no attempt to protect anyone, why were questions about the circumstances of Salian’s death allowed to accumulate rather than being conclusively answered? And if there was no political sensitivity involved, why did the machinery of government appear so reluctant to let an independent agency examine the matter? The more aggressively the Opposition cries “vendetta,” the more obvious another question becomes: what exactly is it afraid the investigation might uncover? Aaditya Thackeray’s political inheritance cannot become an institutional exemption. Being Balasaheb Thackeray’s grandson may provide a formidable political surname; it cannot provide immunity from scrutiny. The CBI must be allowed to pursue every lead, examine every witness, reconstruct every missing link and establish the truth as to what happened to Disha Salian. If the allegations against anyone are false, the investigation should establish that too. But if wrongdoing has occurred, then those responsible must face the consequences. After six years, neither political power nor a famous surname can be allowed to stand between the investigation and the truth.

Restoring Ethics in Higher Education

May 27
3 min read
AI generated image
AI generated image

In the cultural fabric of India, the educator has historically occupied a space higher than the temporal world, encapsulated in the sacred maxim ‘Acharya Devo Bhava’, the teacher is akin to the divine. This guru-shishya parampara was not merely an instructional methodology but a spiritual covenant where knowledge was transmitted alongside a rigorous code of moral rectitude. Today, that revered pedestal is fracturing.


The deeply unsettling revelations surrounding the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) leaks, involving the alleged complicity of university chemistry and botany professors, have laid bare a deeper systemic malaise. This is not an isolated incident of administrative lapse; it represents a profound crisis of academic ethics, signalling that the very custodians of the nation's intellectual and moral future are compromising the integrity of the system they were sworn to protect.


Fragile Credibility

As more cases of unethical behaviour within the teaching community emerge, ranging from plagiarized research and predatory journal publications to cash-for-marks scams, the credibility of the entire academic ecosystem hangs in the balance. The transformation of education from a noble mission into a transactional marketplace has eroded public trust. When professors, who are supposed to mentor the next generation of doctors, scientists and thinkers, engage in paper leaks and institutional fraud, they do not just cheat a system; they actively jeopardize public safety and institutional merit. The psychological toll on millions of honest, hardworking students who find their futures hijacked by the greed of a few privileged insiders is immeasurable.


Historically, the government has recognized that the progress of the nation relies heavily on the quality and dignity of its teaching community. Significant fiscal measures, periodic pay commission hikes and enhanced service conditions have been implemented over the decades to attract and retain premier talent in academia. The underlying philosophy has been simple: by securing the financial and social well-being of educators, society ensures their autonomy and insulates them from corrupting influences. Furthermore, the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 was envisioned as a watershed moment to explicitly address these foundational cracks. The policy outlines a comprehensive framework for restructuring teacher education, establishing merit-based tenure tracks and fostering a culture of continuous professional development steeped in ethical practice. NEP 2020 explicitly aims to restore the status of teachers as the most respected members of society, linking accountability directly with institutional autonomy.


Massive Disconnect

In tandem with legislative policy, the University Grants Commission (UGC) has consistently formulated regulations to preserve academic hygiene. From setting up stringent Consortium for Academic and Research Ethics (CARE) reference lists to filter out fraudulent journals, to mandating anti-plagiarism software and institutional ethical committees, the regulatory framework exists. The UGC has repeatedly warned universities against malpractices and instituted strict punitive measures for academic dishonesty. Yet, despite these top-heavy policy interventions and regulatory mechanisms, a massive disconnect persists when these ideals translate to the ground level.


The practical reality in Indian higher education institutions reveals a battlefield of perverse incentives. At the ground level, professors are often trapped in a hyper-competitive ‘publish or perish’ culture where quantitative metrics override qualitative excellence. Academic promotions and institutional funding are tied to bureaucratic checklists, forcing many to take ethical shortcuts. Furthermore, the massive commercialization of coaching industries and the hyper-inflation of grades have created immense external pressure, turning examinations into high-stakes battlefields where the temptation for financial kickbacks becomes overwhelming. Academic administrators are frequently selected based on political patronage rather than scholarly integrity.


Restoring the tarnished image of the academic community requires a fundamental systemic recalibration. Ethical training must be integrated as a core, non-negotiable component of teacher training and doctoral coursework, rather than treated as a peripheral bureaucratic formality. Institutional audits must become transparent, shifting the focus from mere box-ticking to holistic evaluations of an educator's contribution to learning and mentorship.


The teaching community itself must foster a culture of collective internal accountability, where peer pressure actively discourages ethical compromises instead of protecting errant colleagues.


The crisis triggered by the NEET leaks is a final wake-up call for a nation that prides itself on its civilizational intellectual heritage. Reclaiming the sanctity of the ‘Acharya’ is not merely an exercise in nostalgic romanticism; it is an urgent structural necessity for the survival of India's democratic and developmental aspirations. Only when ethics are restored to the heart of pedagogy can the country rebuild the sacred trust between the teacher and the taught.


(The writer is a former college Principal and Founder of Supporting Shoulders. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page