top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

‘Bharat Ratna to Savarkar will increase its prestige’

Mumbai: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday threw his full weight behind the long-standing demand to confer the Bharat Ratna on Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, asserting that the Hindutva ideologue’s inclusion would enhance the dignity of the country’s highest civilian honour. Bhagwat, who explained the genesis and growth of the RSS over past 100 years in two lectures at the Nehru Centre here on Saturday and Sunday, replied to several...

‘Bharat Ratna to Savarkar will increase its prestige’

Mumbai: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday threw his full weight behind the long-standing demand to confer the Bharat Ratna on Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, asserting that the Hindutva ideologue’s inclusion would enhance the dignity of the country’s highest civilian honour. Bhagwat, who explained the genesis and growth of the RSS over past 100 years in two lectures at the Nehru Centre here on Saturday and Sunday, replied to several questions. While replying to one of the questions, he remarked, “If Swatantraveer Savarkar is given the Bharat Ratna, the prestige of the Bharat Ratna itself will increase.” He was asked, why there has been a delay in conferring the Bharat Ratna on Savarkar, in reply to which, Bhagwat said, “I am not part of that committee. But if I meet someone, I will ask. Even without that honour, he rules the hearts of millions of people.” he added. Social Divisions Bhagwat replied to questions that were clubbed in 14 different groups ranging from national security to environment, social harmony, youth, arts and sports. Whenever the questions suggested or expressed expectations that the RSS should do certain things, Bhagwat stressed on the involvement of the society and initiative from the society in resolving the problems. While addressing the critical issue of Uniform Civil Code, Bhagwat stated that the UCC should be framed by taking everyone into confidence and must not lead to social divisions. In the same way while replying to the question related to illegal migrants in the country, Bhagwat urged people to “detect and report” the “illegal infiltrators” to the police. He also urged people not to give them any employment and to be more “vigilant.” Backing SIR He highlighted that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise has already revealed the “foreigners” living in the country. “The government has a lot to do regarding infiltration. They have to detect and deport. This wasn’t happening until now, but it has started little by little, and it will gradually increase. When the census or the SIR is conducted, many people come to light who are not citizens of this country; they are automatically excluded from the process,” he said. “But we can do one thing: we can work on detection. Their language gives them away. We should detect them and report them to the appropriate authorities. We should inform the police that we suspect these people are foreigners, and they should investigate and keep an eye on them, and we will also keep an eye on them. We will not give employment to any foreigner. If someone is from our country, we will give them employment, but not to foreigners. You should be a little more vigilant and aware,” he added. SC Chief Emphasising the inclusivity of the Sangh, he said that anyone can become ‘Sarsanghchalak’ (RSS chief), including the SC and STs, as the decision is solely dependent on the work that any individual put for the organisation. “Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shudra or Brahmin does not qualify for the Sarsanghchalak position (RSS Chief), a Hindu will become the one who works and is best available. A Hindu will become, and that can also be an SC or ST. Anyone can become it depends on the work. Today, if you see, all classes have representation in the Sangh. The decision is taken on the basis of one who works and is best available,” he said. He pointed out that when the RSS was founded, its work began in a Brahmin-dominated community and hence, most of its founders were Brahmins, which led to the organisation being labelled as a Brahmin outfit at the time. People always look for an organisation that has representatives from their community, he said. “If I were to choose a chief, I would go by the ‘best available candidate’ criterion. When I was appointed RSS chief, there were many best candidates, but they were not available. I was the one who could be relieved from duties and appointed,” he said. He said that to belong to the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe communities is not a disqualification, and neither is being a Brahmin a qualification to become the RSS chief. Ready to step down if Sangh asks for Dr. Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday said the Sangh had asked him to continue working despite his age, while stressing that he would step down from the post whenever the organisation directs him to do so. “There is no election to the post of RSS chief. Regional and divisional heads appoint the chief. Generally, it is said that after turning 75, one should work without holding any post,” Bhagwat said. “I have completed 75 years and informed the RSS, but the organisation asked me to continue working. Whenever the RSS asks me to step down, I will do so, but retirement from work will never happen,” he said.

Retirement from politics…

Updated: Oct 21, 2024

Politicians are considered to be a class apart. Their rise could be self-sustained efforts, familial or party based. However, their stay at the politics and in particular at the helm of affairs is shrouded in a usual question of mandatory retirement posed more often as prominent leaders around the world are getting older. Although many of the world political leaders are currently well beyond the normal retirement age of working class, the discussion rests with the results of an election they contest at their level.

In the United States of America, for example, Americans prefer to work more either as weekly or annual working hours as well as the number of years of life they spend working in spite of the benefits accrued to them by the Government. It can be said that their maturity and expertise is needed and used by establishments and enterprises with mutual benefits. A medical anthropologist and historian from USA has commented that Americans prefer higher wages to reduced working hours when the question of Four Days Week arrives.

Retirement conventions for various occupations around the world have revolved around the advances in manufacturing and computing. It has been observed that many Europeans prefer shorter working hours and longer vacations by and large. As for the formulation of retirement age, it has been pointed out that the convention for a set retirement age came up in the 20th century and was based on the data about life expectancy and societal factors.

Research suggests that remaining active and staying healthy throughout your life will provide you with an age to stay better equipped to work even in a typically volatile environment of politics. However, there are certain natural drawbacks for work due to aging. Whereas incidences of cognitive decline cannot be tolerated in most of the workspaces, certain people are adamant enough to stick through somehow instead of relinquishing.

Coming back to the political arena, it has been held that the toughest question is who decides when to retire? Certain norms may have been prescribed by those who have formatted the policy. However, once you are in position, it is difficult for even any of the insiders to suggest you about the same as the same may boomrang on the insider himself. Any of the discussions on cognitive abilities are shooed and remain grounded.

Maintaining once own stance, dignity and demure seems to be one of the surest ways to quiet any issues of political retirement. The rest is said to be governed by the stars as they say.

Going back once again, Aristotle considers politics as study of communities and gives it a higher priority than morals and beliefs. Politics in India is rooted in human to human framework and gets amalgamated in groups of communities for purpose of placing forward agendas considered non-congenial to other groups.

Just as there could be hardly any family without disturbances aka disputes that need settlements amicably, the groups, states and nations too have and breed inherent disputes and hence are unlikely to remain together. The beauty of such relationships could be observed when certain components sitting on the fence conjure meetings with opposite factions under a disguise of being long time friends.


(The writer is a resident of Surat, Gujarat. Views personal)

Comments


bottom of page