top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Rio’s Deadly Reckoning

Brazil’s deadliest police raid exposes the futility of a decades-long war on drugs and the inequality that sustains the racket.

The police operation in Rio de Janeiro that killed more than 130 people this week was the deadliest in Brazil’s history. What authorities hailed as a ‘success’ against the Red Command – Rio’s most powerful gang - has instead exposed the brutality, impunity and political convenience that sustain Brazil’s cycle of urban violence.


Over 113 alleged members were arrested, and caches of weapons and drugs seized. Yet for all the rhetoric of victory, it was a grim reminder of Brazil’s failed security doctrine. The images of residents forced to recover bodies themselves evoked less triumph than tragedy. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s promise of a forensic inquiry and federal oversight is a familiar gesture in a country where accountability has long been the first casualty of the drug war.


The scene could have been drawn from any decade since Brazil’s military dictatorship. The state’s heavy-handed approach to ‘public security’ dates back to the 1960s, when the generals institutionalised the notion that poverty equalled subversion. In the 1980s, as democracy returned, the vacuum left by an absent welfare state was filled not by reform but by repression. The favelas (Rio’s sprawling informal settlements) became both scapegoat and battleground. Police units, nominally fighting organised crime, acted with near-total impunity; the drug gangs, born in prisons such as Rio’s Ilha Grande and São Paulo’s Carandiru, turned into parallel governments, dispensing crude justice and employment where the state would not.


Carandiru itself remains an infamous symbol. In 1992, 111 inmates were killed when police stormed the São Paulo penitentiary to quell a riot. The massacre sparked international outrage but little structural change. Nearly three decades later, in 2021, Rio’s Jacarezinho neighbourhood witnessed another bloodbath: 28 people killed in a police raid. Each time, officials vowed to restore order. And each time, the gangs multiplied.


Today’s Red Command (Comando Vermelho) grew out of that carceral past. Its roots lie in the alliance between common criminals and leftist militants jailed together during the dictatorship. What began as an ideological fraternity morphed, by the 1980s, into Brazil’s most lethal criminal network, sustained by cocaine trafficking and control of territory. Its rival, the São Paulo-based First Capital Command (PCC), now dominates much of Brazil’s vast hinterland. The result is a fractured criminal landscape: gangs that are at once transnational businesses and local feudal powers, entrenching cycles of violence that police raids rarely break.


For politicians, such operations serve a purpose. They project authority in a country weary of chaos. Castro, a conservative allied to former president Jair Bolsonaro, has built his image around law-and-order theatrics. Likewise, Lula, though more conciliatory, cannot appear soft on crime as he tries to steady a fragile coalition government. Both know that televised raids play well with Brazil’s anxious middle class.


What makes the Penha operation so shocking is not its novelty but its scale. To plan for two months and still record over a hundred deaths suggests less an accident than a doctrine. Brazil’s police are among the world’s deadliest: in 2023 alone, they killed more than 6,000 people, overwhelmingly young, Black and poor. Few of these cases lead to prosecution. Each new massacre further erodes trust in institutions, pushing residents to rely on the very gangs the state claims to fight.


The deeper malaise is political. Brazil’s drug war, like America’s before it, has substituted spectacle for strategy. Successive governments have failed to pair policing with social investment, education, or drug-law reform. Instead, they have militarised the favelas and normalised extrajudicial violence. When the army was deployed to Rio’s streets ahead of the 2016 Olympics, officials spoke of ‘pacification.’ Yet the pacified zones soon reverted to contested slums, while corruption scandals hollowed out the very police units meant to uphold order.


Real security in Brazil will depend less on helicopters and rifles than on restoring legitimacy to the state through fair policing, judicial reform and opportunities that undercut the gangs’ social base.

Comments


bottom of page